I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten. My company has 250 users for the solution. We use the solution 24/7 for daily meetings. 

Ours is a big organization with more than 20,000 users using Microsoft Teams. Our company's plan to increase the solution's usage depends on the number of new employees joining the organization.

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for scalability. About 20,000 users use Microsoft Teams in our organization.

Sometimes when we're using it from home, videos can break up a little bit. However, I'm not sure if it's an issue with the solution or if it's people's network connections. Our organization practically had all its staff using the solution throughout the pandemic, and it scaled well then.

The scalability depends on use cases. If we are just using chats, it is very scalable. If we use it like SharePoint or any file-sharing solution to take over old technologies, we get limited, and storage becomes pricey. We have had calls with more than 100 people. It does pretty well. 

If there is an issue, if someone is dropping calls or unable to hear anything, we can see their recent calls and track their network connectivity through the admin center. It usually ends up being the user’s internet issues, not a Microsoft issue. Around 550 users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization.

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. More than 1,500 users are using the solution in our organization.

My company has more than 10,000 employees, and all are using Microsoft Teams. Most of the users are engineers.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven to eight out of ten.

My company plans to increase the usage of Microsoft Teams in the future.

I rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten.

I rate the tool's scalability a nine out of ten. My company has 1100 users. 

I rate Microsoft Teams' scalability an eight out of ten. It has more than 10,000 users in my company who use it daily. 

Microsoft Teams is a pretty scalable solution. I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten for scalability.

I would rate the product's scalability a nine-point five out of ten. The whole world uses Office and it's an extension of it. My company has around 200 users for the product. Since we are a law firm, users are mostly non-technical persons. We use the solution daily. 

We have 5000 Microsoft Teams users in our organization. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten.

Around 1,000 people use the solution.

Microsoft Teams is a scalable tool because it integrates with many other tools and different kinds of apps. It is a really good tool because you can plan your meetings, you can take notes, and run your scrum meets. In all the aforementioned aspects, it's really good.

Maybe more than 500 users are using the tool in our company.

For our scenarios, scalability is quite high. We mainly set up infrastructure for small and medium corporate clients, so we use the public cloud. We have not faced any scalability issues for up to 20 users, which is the maximum size of clients we typically serve. So, for our specialization, there haven't been any scalability concerns.

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. We have more than 600 users using this solution, from all levels in my organization. We have no problem with all our users using this solution.

Thousands of people are using Microsoft Teams in our organization. I have had approximately 10 to 20 people in one Microsoft Teams call.

It is quite a scalable solution because we have over 1,500 employees using it. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten.

We have 500 Microsoft Teams users in our organization. It is a scalable product. I rate the scalability an eight.

From my point of view,  the scalability seems very good. We didn't have any problems. It's not the highest level we have from Microsoft services, but even with courses with more than a hundred participants, there are no problems.

There are around a thousand end users in my university. Students come in and they graduate, so that number doesn't change much.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Around 2,000 employees in my company are using it.

The solution is used regularly.

In my current organization, approximately 4,000 people are using Microsoft Teams. In my previous organization, 1,80,000 people were using the solution.

I have found Microsoft Teams to be scalable for what I have used it for. I have not tested the solution for more than 10 users at one time.

We have approximately four people using this solution in my organization. We use the solutions approximately every two weeks.

The solution is highly scalable. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten. It still has a scope for improvement.

I rate the product’s scalability a ten out of ten. In our organization, 150 people are using the solution. I have plans to increase the number of users by 10% till next year.

Microsoft Teams is very easy to scale. In my company, we have around 40,000 to 50,000 users of the solution.

I would rate Microsoft Teams' scalability a nine out of ten. My company has 40,000-50,000 employees globally and everyone has a Microsoft Teams account. About 60-70 percent of my company's workforce is working from home and we use the product to communicate with our team on a daily basis. We increase the tool's usage as new employees join us. 

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. Our company is big, and I've never felt any glitches or hanging issues with the solution. Around 2,00,000 users are using the solution in our organization.

The solution is scalable and I would rate it a seven out of ten. My company has 500 users for the product. 

Microsoft Teams is a completely scalable solution. Every employee in my organization uses the solution, and I use the solution every day.

I rate Microsoft Teams a ten out of ten for scalability.

We didn't face any problems with the product's scalability. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

In our workplace, we have 250 employees and 3,000 students who use Microsoft Teams.

There are around 500 to 600 users in my organization using this solution. 

I have never had issues with Mircosoft Teams. However, the IT guys handle the scalability. A lot of users in our organization use Microsoft Teams. More than 6,000 users use the solution in our organization.

It is a scalable solution. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

Everybody in our organization uses the solution. It’s on every PC in the company. It’s, give or take, a bit less than 100 people.

It's scalable.

The solution is highly scalable. I rate it a nine out of ten. We have 1000 users in our organization, and we use it to its maximum potential.

I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten. My company is a start-up and has 12 users for the product. 

Microsoft Teams is a scalable app.

It lives in the cloud, so it's scalable. We're a relatively small company and have approximately 300 users but some of our client companies are huge and can have somewhere between 10,000-30,000 users. We don't have dedicated deployment staff but we have an internal IT department that takes care of things. 

The tool is scalable.

I rate the tool’s scalability an eight out of ten.

The solution's scalability is good because there is no limitation on the number of people who can join the call simultaneously. I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for scalability. Around 1,000 users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization.

More than 7,000 users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization on a daily basis.

I would rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten. My company has 40-60 users for the product. We use the product at least on a weekly basis. 

My company has 150 users for Microsoft Teams. 

I would rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has 800 users for the solution. 

The solution scales well. It's easy to implement new users.

We all use Teams in my company. We have about 80 people using it. 

I would rate Microsoft Teams' scalability a ten out of ten. My company has 10 users for it. 

It is a scalable solution.

If you want to include other people, it's so complex. Sometimes, if you want to add guests, they appear as external. You can add individuals as external or guests; they are quite different. 

Additionally, the licensing process for adding people can be really complicated; it can take hours to show up. Sometimes, we create a user, and it may take 24 hours before they gain access to what they need. So, it's definitely not easy to scale.

I rate the solution’s scalability a six out of ten.

We have at least 300 people, including all of our external or guest, using the solution.

My company has 2700 users for the product. I use the product every day. 

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution, and more than 300 to 400 users use the solution in our organization.

Over 1,000 people use the solution in my organization.

We are an enterprise business, and our entire organization uses Microsoft Teams.

The solution's scalability is a six or seven out of ten. We have 20-25 users in our organization.

Microsoft Teams has good scalability, and around 30 users use the solution in our organization.

I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for scalability.

The product pulls some computing power. More than 40 consultants, developers, and customers use the solution in our organization.

I rate Microsoft Teams a seven or eight out of ten for scalability. Around 200 users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten for scalability.

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

I haven't run into a problem with the scalability of the solution. I've used it at my last job with teams that are as small as 15 people and the thing that's nice about it is that I can be part of a dozen teams and it easily maintains the communication to all the teams separately so conversations stay organized.

We're business consultants, and, right now, there are about a dozen of us using it. The consultants are located in different geographic areas of the US, and there are even people working in India that are using Teams. Geographically, the solution expands to make communication possible anywhere.

The organization I work with now, as I understand it, has plans for increasing usage. Right now, it's rather limited in terms of who is using it. Maybe 20% of the people on staff are and there's about a hundred people on staff in total. 20% of those people using Teams in a relatively limited way. Frankly, I'm trying to encourage people to use Teams and drop other video conferencing tools.

We use the solution daily in our organization, and we have plans to increase the usage.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten for scalability.

We have 100 Microsoft Teams users in our organization.

My company has six users for Teams. 

The solution's scalability is good enough for us. We have never faced any issues with the solution's scalability. We use Microsoft Teams about three to four times a week. We use it every alternate day for about half an hour, two hours, or one and a half hours. We have never faced any issues, and even if it's a continuous three hours meeting, there's no stoppage in the service. Currently, 15 users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization, and we may scale up to about 30 to 35 users after some time.

There are 160 users in our organization using Teams. We have hosted live events, and we have gotten more than 1,000 participants to join.

The solution can scale. However, it could be better.

We have about 200 people using the solution right now at our organization.

Scalability is contingent upon the projects at hand. As projects expand, so does the team size. This scalability is influenced by the number of global projects and remote sites. Additionally, it correlates with the client base; as clients increase, more personnel are required to support them. We have a team of two to three individuals, but as our business grows and client numbers increase, we will accordingly augment our team size to accommodate the expansion. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Our marketing team frequently utilizes this tool, often engaging with clients on a daily basis through multiple meetings. In contrast, our technical team typically uses it for work approximately three times a week.

Our company has about 14,000 employees, but we are not all using the intranet. We are an industrial company and we have people working in manufacturing and they don't have access to computers all the time. 

As far as scalability, we would like to have the ability to use the product off-site. That is, we want to be able to have remote people use Teams with us internally. This is the only thing I've heard that's posing a problem with scaling. 

It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability an eight. We have 50 users in our organization.

The product is scalable and it can scale to tens of thousands of users as long as your system and infrastructure are able to handle it. My company has 5000 users for the product. 

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. Around 50 users are using the solution in our organization. I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for scalability.

This solution is used by almost everyone in our organization. I would say there are more than 2,500 users.

I have about 100 students and there are no issues with the tool's scalability. 

The solution is scalable and we have five users for the product. 

The solution's scalability is great and I would rate it a ten out of ten. 

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for scalability.

Microsoft is always scalable, it depends on the level of licensing an organization has purchased.

I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability. It depends on the licenses and the number of users based on the licenses.

In our organization, we have around 250 users using this solution.

My company has 200 users for the product. 

The solution is very scalable. We can use it on any desktop or operating system like Android or iOS. At present, we have 15-20 executives using it.

I would rate Microsoft Teams' scalability around seven to eight out of ten. We have more than 10k users for the solution. 

This is a scalable solution. It integrates with a lot of Microsoft software.

In terms of scalability, I don't have that information. We are a company with more than  130,000 employees. Even for large events, Teams  works flawlessly. I don't believe there are any scalability issues.

I don't see scalability as an issue. Initially, we had fewer licenses than we do now. As we expanded, we acquired more licenses and added more team members to the platform.

From what I recall, we started with about 500 licenses and we now have closer to 2,000. Two weeks ago, we had about 700 regular users. Adding users was seamless from our perspective, although you have to make sure that your network is configured properly, otherwise, there may be issues with performance.

So far, it scales well.

My company has 200 users for the product. 

It's quite easy to scale the solution if you need to. It's possible to add new people into meetings, for example. We haven't had any issues in that sense.

The solution is scalable. My company has 1008 users for the product. 

I would rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has 40-50 users for the product. 

I would rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten. 

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for scalability. Around 1,000 users are using Microsoft Teams in our company.

We have had some fairly large meetings on here and I think that it scales fine.

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. Sometimes, when you share the screen with a client it goes blank. It becomes clear once you rejoin the meeting. I think this is a bug or a drawback.  

The solution is very scalable and my company has 400 users for the product. 

We have more than 2000 solution users in our organization. I rate its scalability a seven out of ten.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten for scalability.

I would rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has 6000 employees. 

It is a scalable solution.

The scalability of Microsoft Teams is good and is easy to do.

We have approximately 450 - 500 users using the solution.

There were only two of us in the company who were using this solution. As such, we never need to scale it.

The solution is very easy to scale.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

In our company, almost 500 people use the solution.

It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability a ten out of ten.

You can scale the solution if you need to. It does quite well in that regard and covers our needs very well. A company that needs to expand it out can do so quite easily.

Currently, we don't have more than 15 users on the solution.

We haven't had any scalability issues so far. With the COVID-19 situation, our usage really shot up on Teams. We didn't run into any problems scaling up. So many people who were not using Teams are on the platform now. Previously, the solution was used by 30-40% of the company, and now it's closer to 70-80%. 

It is a scalable solution. Three hundred users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten. 

We have 220 solution users in our organization.

Scalability and adding licenses is a straightforward process. We have had no issues at all.

We have a hundred or more people using this solution. They are all end-users.

The solution is easy to scale, however, you need to take into account best practices so that you don't lose oversight on the number of teams that you have. 

There are other things that can be improved of in terms of scaling. For the moment, you can have approximately 5,000+ different teams within your Office 365 license. In each team, you can have multiple channels. The number of channels with limited access rights is limited to 256 or 250. If you create a channel where you want to find all your different projects and you have more than 250 customers within one team, you run into issues. Then you have to create separate teams for each customer. In those teams, you have various possibilities on channels. We started using a team, for instance, for customer projects. However, in customer projects, you are limited. It's only on about 25 channels that you can give access rights to certain people. If you are working on the project with company X together for a customer, you don't want them to see another project for another customer with a competing solution. That's the tricky part.

That was a limitation that we encountered with scaling. We changed the approach from having a team customer project to creating teams for each customer where we have projects.

Currently, in our organization, we have 250 employees using Teams. We use it quite extensively every day.

The solution scales automatically for our needs. We add users and it scales accordingly. 

We are only 30 people using this program, but what I have not noticed any issues when more colleagues participate in Microsoft Teams. When usage increases, the program still offers a seamless, consistent experience. We may even add more users, so I believe the program is very scalable.

I think the system is quite scalable. 

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. Around 5 users are using the solution in our organization. The solution is used a few times a week in our company.

I rate the solution ten out of ten for scalability.

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for scalability.

The scalability is good. It's not a problem to put more users onto the solution. We do plan to increase usage, but we'll take some time before doing so.

I've never tried to scale it personally, however, I do believe it would be possible to do so.

The scalability is pretty good, our entire company uses it and we're about 60 people which includes engineers, sales, administrative, accounting, shipping and receiving.

The solution is quite scalable; you can easily add other programs to it.

The scalability of this solution is good. We have almost 140,000 users in this company and Teams is used extensively. 

To be honest, we have never explored the possibilities for further expanding the capabilities of the program. I'm quite sure we can explore the addition of features and functionality that do a lot of interesting things. But because it is a bit clumsy to use the file attachments, which is really a basic task I try to avoid using it and I favor the use of Trello instead of Teams. Because we do not currently use it more, we don't do much exploration into scaling it. I don't think there is any real problem with scaling the number of users. But again, we have not been pushing the limitations or the product to scale its use.

We have 300 users, on a daily basis. It's one of our major tools within the company.

We are using it to its maximum capacity on every aspect, functional and non-functional.

The product is scalable, but the organizations that I helped are around 1,000 users. Some organizations that are supported by our company have 1,000 or more people.

One administrator helped us with our experience of Office 365 and administered this solution. I think three would be enough to manage the solution.

We have approximately 260 people in my organization using this solution.

I have not had a problem with scalability. We are using it corporate-wide across all company roles. At this point, I don't see our usage increasing.

The solution is very scalable - we have more than 500 users at this stage.

The solution is scalable, we have approximately 500 users.