Mule Anypoint Platform Pricing

Corydon Hinton - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Systems Engineer at Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc.

I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. The solution is pretty pricey. There might be something out there that's more expensive. We pay $250,000 per year. It includes the production and non-production environment.

View full review »
AA
Works at Nagarro

The pricing of the Mule Anypoint Platform is totally different than Dell Boomi. The Mule Anypoint Platform works on the basis of the volume, whereas Dell Boomi charges on the basis of the connectors that you buy.

The price of the Mule Anypoint Platform works on the basis of volume. For example, there is an API, and based on how much data the API will process the price is calculated on the processing units required. 

For our laptops or personal computers, we have RAM. Similarly, the Mule Anypoint Platform has vCores. The vCore size is calculated on the basis of the number of transactions that API has to process, such as 50,000, 500,000, or 1 million. Based on the transition size, they will tell you how many vCores are required. This could be any amount, such as 0.2, 10, or 50. We are then given a price, and along with that, there are many other factors, other than how many vCores are you purchasing. For example, there could be other additional solutions that need to be purchased and connectors that are not free. 

You could need other licenses, such as ones for Salesforce, there are multiple factors that they don't share.

Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi.

I rate the price of Mule Anypoint Platform a three out of five.

They do not share enough information regarding the full costs.

View full review »
SandeepSrirangam - PeerSpot reviewer
Staff Engineer at Project44

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform really needs to work on its pricing model because it's very complicated. CloudHub's pricing is pretty straightforward because they charge based on the number of codes you use. However, it's very tricky to calculate the cost of RTF. Moving from CloudHub to RTF creates a lot of challenges, including overshooting the license purchase. It was a nightmare for us to take down everything and change our infrastructure.

So while using RTF, we need to plan how to integrate things well in advance. If we do not use the reusability features within MuleSoft, we will add APIs which will cost more. So we have to find a way to reuse the APIs and be smart in making the integrations.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Mule Anypoint Platform
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Mule Anypoint Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AwaisOmer - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer at Torei Consulting

The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients. It is intended for use with enterprise or mid-level companies who have available resources. 

View full review »
SR
Head-IT Common Tools & Integration Services at Arcelik Group

Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution.

View full review »
AB
MuleSoft Developer at SynergySoft

Currently, MuleSoft is moving from the license type to the pay-as-you-go type. The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive. That is the main reason why we don't have a lot of small-sized customers. With MuleSoft's new approach, we will have new opportunities to integrate small businesses.

View full review »
Chandra Manohar - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO and Head of Strategy, Technology & Innovation at Cashapona

Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced.

View full review »
Nilesh Tarlekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Consultant at Tata Consultancy

While I'm not sure of the exact cost, it is reasonable, and less than TIBCO.

View full review »
JL
Owner at Skyward Tech

It's an expensive solution and then you have to try and find a MuleSoft engineer, which is even harder.

View full review »
AT
Architect at Vtr

In terms of pricing, Anypoint Platform is on the expensive side. I would rate the costliness an eight out of ten.

View full review »
Sambit Kumar Sahu - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Development Engineer at Yovant Labs Pvt. Ltd.

On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten.

As it is free of cost and we have to take an enterprise license, there is probably no fee.

View full review »
RV
Integration Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

I am not aware of the cost. It is completely managed by the vendor management team.

View full review »
RM
Chief Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The product is very expensive. I would rate the pricing six out of ten.

View full review »
SM
Techpreneur at Riverbird Technology Partners

The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM.

I rate the price of the Mule Anypoint Platform a seven out of ten.

View full review »
MS
Sr. Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

The product is one cost. Support comes complete with no additional cost even though they pay some special attention to us. We are not a huge client. I would say we are smaller than a lot of their clients. But they do have, as I understand, some interest to grow in Canada and build their local assets. It works out well for us because we have some benefits with the company.

View full review »
Victor Crudu - PeerSpot reviewer
Salesforce CPQ Consultant at Milo

Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable. 

View full review »
JavedMomin - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at Unify Technologies

The pricing and licensing can be a little bit expensive. 

View full review »
JD
Chief Digital Transformation Officer at a consumer goods company with 501-1,000 employees

We can't discuss pricing at this time as we are under an NDA.

View full review »
SK
Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites.

View full review »
RT
Senior Technical Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

It's an expensive product. They need to work on their pricing so that potential customers aren't scared off.

While enterprise-level organizations may not mind the pricing, smaller organizations wouldn't find the price suitable. Therefore, they should work to maybe develop a cheaper license for small companies so that they too can get the benefits of the solution - but at a much smaller cost.

View full review »
AS
Content strategist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The license fees are a little bit expensive but you get a lot out of it. Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying.

View full review »
it_user1040118 - PeerSpot reviewer
Regional Vice President for Operations at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

There are no other fees beyond the standard licensing costs.

View full review »
AG
Director of Innovation at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

The pricing is pretty high.

View full review »
it_user628053 - PeerSpot reviewer
Self Employed/Independent at a consultancy

Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings.

I would advise on making an overview of the type of connections needed, technology, and applications used and to match this to the licensing model and take the time for the explanation on the licensing model. What is the minimal licensing model, which parts are mandatory, when can you scale up or down, etc. One needs a full picture to understand it.

MuleSoft is also known for Mule ESB, their initial Open Source offering, and this one is still available. It should not, however, be considered for enterprise class use cases as it does not include the required out-of-the-box connectors and requires heavy coding in Java. The Anypoint Runtime Manager is also part of the Enterprise Licenses and no management console is thus available for Open Source making it a black box on production as is the case with custom point-to-point middleware.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Mule Anypoint Platform
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Mule Anypoint Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.