Mule ESB Other Advice

JustinJames
IT Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
My opinion is that Mule ESB depends on the business and the continuity of their enrollment. If you are a system that has not much left to repair, then your products and your APIs are assets within your organization. Here in the bank, we are facing different kinds of issues when we are integrating different systems: * We are communicating with different card carriers like Mastercard and Visa. * Their standards are different according to the client requirements, i.e. exactly what kind of card they're looking for. * They can get the products according to their requirements as well as their budget. I would rate Mule ESB with 7.5 or 8 out of 10. * It's really easy to implement. * It's supporting our platforms: Windows, Linux, and Mac. * The performance. * It's free. I'm looking for an API platform that supports the whole technology as well as the next-gen. Mule ESB is lacking for self-support, self-training, and documentation. The documentation of the product is less because they're selling the training. You have to enroll for the training, then you'll get the full documentation. If you're an advanced user, you will not get much information from the public documentation. View full review »
Misabh Ulhaq
Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
My advice to others who are implementing this solution is to first become acquainted with the forums. There are always reports coming out about the software, and new technologies. The next thing is that I would suggest always starting with the latest version. Older versions are available, but you should install the most recent one. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. View full review »
Safouen Chibani
Developer JAVA/JEE, Mule ESB at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
I will soon be migrating to version 4 of Mule ESB, although we are also interested in the WSO2 solution because it seems to be very complete. Using Mule ESB does not require somebody to be a Java developer, although there are some Java concepts that you need to know. For example, some people use JSON, and I find that they are scared of Mule ESB because it is based on Java. But really, it isn't a problem if they don't know it. This solution has good performance and support, but not everybody can use it because many of the features are expensive. Especially for application management, it is expensive compared to solutions such as WSO2. It is limiting for small and medium-sized companies. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Mule ESB. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
425,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ravi Gunda
Senior Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We're partners of MuleSoft. We provide the solution's service to our clients. The solution would be useful for large organizations. If there are more than three or four systems, and if there is an expansion, it would work best. Small or medium enterprises with two or three systems, may find the solution a little bit unorganized. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. If the stability were more reliable, I'd rate it higher. View full review »
sudhir Kilani
Developer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Mule ESB. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
425,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.