Mule ESB Previous Solutions
I have experience with TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus. I have fifteen years of experience with webMethods.io.
Compared to Mule ESB, you will find that there are fewer coding challenges in webMethods.io.
I have little experience with Oracle Fusion. It's quite good, but the interface is pretty old-fashioned. I worked with IBM WebSphere as well. That was a big part of another project I worked on, but these are the two technologies I've used.
Currently, I'm working with Oracle Fusion. These solutions require elaborate coding, so you need to be extremely experienced in programming, with the ability to write tons of complex code. It's good to have a solid background in coding, but you shouldn't need to be an expert to work.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
ESB (Enterprise Service Bus)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, IBM, Software AG and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
I previously used an eCommerce platform called Intershop, but it's not really an ESB. Intershop allows for the development of the whole eCommerce system, from the back end to the front end. I switched to Mule due to the needs of a new project that I was starting because it acts as a bridge between legacy systems and front-end systems.
RG
reviewer933312
Senior Software Engineer at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have used webMethods, which is an on-prem solution.
View full review »We used Oracle ten years ago.
View full review »MU
Misabh Ulhaq
Software Engineer at ADM
We did not use another solution prior to this one. We started with the open source solution, version 3.1.0, and we implemented all of the services. We then paid for a licensed version.
View full review »JJ
JustinJames
IT Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
WebMethod is very expensive, but their support is awesome. I closely work with the operating technical support team. For retrieving the code from our bank, they are working with us very closely. Sometimes they are flying over here for conducting demos.
Especially in the Middle East, MuleSoft is not doing like that. They are not doing much marketing in the industry. Maybe they are more focusing on South America or Asia. I'm not seeing much in the Middle East.
View full review »VB
Badrakh V
Information System Architect at Astvision
I was previously using Talend ESB but it's more complex than Mule ESB to use. The commercial versions have more features than Talend ESB.
View full review »We didn't previously use a different solution. We've only been working with MuleSoft.
View full review »NT
Naveen Tak
Senior Integration Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Firstly, the project architecture team decided to go with Mule.
Secondly, the project was from scratch and we want only microservices exposed over API hence, Mule was a promising deal.
However, in my next project we weren't able to go with as it much pricier than its competitors. Actually, from all the other vendors.
View full review »SC
Safouen Chibani
Developer JAVA/JEE, Mule ESB at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
We started with Mule ESB.
View full review »NK
sudhir Kilani
Developer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We were using a variety of technologies, but we use this solution because it is a very lightweight message processing system.
View full review »We used Oracle OSB before and some of our clients used TIBCO middleware or Java CAPS.
But we suggested that clients switch to Mule ESB due to:
- The lower licensing cost
- The availability of cloud connectors
- CloudHub platform (supporting iPaaS)
- A suite of 110+ connectors to use.
I did not use any ESB earlier, but this is the best Community Edition ESB available in the market. However, we abused it as a workflow engine.
View full review »We switched because this solution was found to be cost effective, freely available for community edition, and an easy transition from any programming background.
View full review »SH
develope2160648
Mulesoft Developer at a tech consulting company with 201-500 employees
Mule ESB is better than Oracle.
View full review »TP
TejasPurohit
Co-Founder & Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
I am working on a number of open-source integration platforms and MuleSoft ESB is an ideal choice for us. This tool makes it easier for the developers to deliver complex projects with the best quality.
View full review »PD
reviewer1413528
Director - Projects at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Some of my team members have worked on other ESB solutions in the past, but in this organization, we have not dealt with one other than MuleSoft.
One of the products that we are familiar with is a solution by IBM. This competing product is strong in terms of method-based integration.
View full review »RC
reviewer1429773
Manager- Integration Services & BPM at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Prior to Mule ESB, we were using an IBM solution that was pretty good. Mule ESB is cheaper but I would choose the IBM product instead.
View full review »Previously, we used Apache Camel and Spring Integration. However, they require more technical involvement than MuleSoft ESB.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
ESB (Enterprise Service Bus)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, IBM, Software AG and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.