The scalability of Mule ESB is very good. 

Mule ESB has been in use since 2008. It has been a long-running tool and application and has supported multiple phases.

With the current trend and new tools emerging, like the JNA stuff, MuleSoft has plugins for all IDEs. If these plugins continue to be available and supported in the future, it'll be easier to develop. This would definitely enhance the product's scalability.

In my specific department, around 60 people are using it.

Around 100 to 200 people in my company use the product.

Mule ESB is scalable.

The solution is scalable although we don't need to scale for now. 

The tool is scalable if we use the CloudHub and RTF components. Otherwise, ESB isn't scalable. I work with small, medium, and large businesses.

Mule ESB is a scalable solution. Our clients for Mule ESB are small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

The scalability is good. It varies with the request I receive or the application size. It can be done with much ease. 

The scalability is amazing. You can increase the horizontal perspective or the increase the vertical perspective. It depends on your business needs.

The solution has great scalability.

It can scale based on your needs. It is scalable vertically and horizontally.

We have used it in many projects. Its usage might increase. It depends on the high-level management. If new products are coming, they're going to use it for sure.

The scalability is good, and I rate it a nine out of ten. We have about 20 users using this solution. We do not have plans to increase the number of users, as it depends on the number of use cases we deploy. We have developers, managers and business users using this solution.

We have not had any issues regarding up-scaling and other things. We are in the process of increasing the usage of Mule so that it can take up to two thousand requests per unit minute.

Like any application, Mule is constrained by the limits of memory size and CPU performance.

Threading profiles define the overall capacity of your Mule instance in terms of scaling and capacity. The performance of each moving part involved in processing each request will also impact the global throughput of your application.

The scalability is easy. It can be done horizontally or vertically. We are scaling horizontally because we don't have any space left in the server. If we need to expand the number of nodes then it depends upon the licensing.

Our development team has three people, and I am the lead.

It is very scalable. It is also easily scalable.

I had about two developers internally, and they were taking care of its deployment and maintenance. In terms of the end users, it probably impacted hundreds or thousands of employees.

I moved from Mule 4.1 to 4.2 and it was really easy if you are migrating only one or two applications. It's very fast. I'm doing some experiments on my workspace for around 20-25 applications. 

I'm opening all of my applications in one shot, and it is scaling for me. I didn't update them as a bulk application. I worked by importing them one by one and it was fine.

Mule ESB is a highly scalable solution.

I am the only one using Mule ESB in my organization and I use it daily.

We have not had scalability issues.

The solution is scalable.

This solution is very scalable, and we can use it however we like. It can connect to every kind of system.

There are approximately two hundred people using the system, directly and indirectly.

The scalability is good. We have a banking application running worldwide through the solution which attracts many users.

Scalability depends on how an application using Mule ESB is designed and so far, we haven't had any issues with the scalability.

In terms of scalability, it is very good.

Like a typical Java application, one should know how to tune a Java based server.

However, we have experienced issues when handling massive volumes of 20 million records to Salesforce (from on premises systems). We also experienced issues when we executed batch jobs of up to 120 jobs in a cluster of Mule ESB instances and when handling large volume of data (in the millions).

Nevertheless, many connectors like Enterprise JDBC and DataWeave support the streaming of data.

I would rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten. We have a few hundred users for the product. 

We did have scalability issues. It demanded more RAM at times, when there were a larger number of requests while listening over FTP. This is the case with any web container.

This solution is scalable.

No issues with scalability. Especially the Cloud deployments can scale on demand and are seamless and reliable.

The solution is scalable and stable. 

There were no scalability issues.

Mule ESB's scalability is pretty good. It performs well.

In terms of numbers of people using the solution, actually Mule ESB plays an integrated role, so none of the users directly use it. But otherwise if you ask the production team and the development team, I would say close to 20 members are using this platform.

We definitely plan on increasing usage for Mule ESB because our customer is starting to do more AP's on the platform.

This product is hosted on the AWS cloud, so it has inherent scalability.

We have implemented this solution for between three and five customers in the past year. It is suitable for medium to large companies, where we have clients in each category including some that are quite big.

I have had a couple of issues with scalability. Our use case has traffic that depends a lot on the SDK, so there are a lot of users.

The product scales very well.