I think that it is pretty expensive. It is very innovative in terms of multiple licensing options out there. So, depending upon the need of the organization, they can offer different kinds of licensing. 

Our customers have a lot of concerns about the increased pricing. The customer feels MuleSoft is very costly, and they are also exploring other integration tools for a lower price. Maybe we should retain the existing customers by offering some discounts. At least the existing customers can be retained this way. This is regarding the licensing part only because customers based out of North America and Europe have shown many concerns recently. They are a bit concerned about pricing.

I would rate the pricing model of this solution a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most expensive and 10 being the best pricing.

I'm not sure of the exact cost of the solution. 

While I haven't had detailed discussions, my understanding is that the solution is expensive. I found it pricey when I was doing some research.

While I find MuleSoft's product to be expensive, I believe in paying for value. If the product delivers as expected and provides excellent performance without issues, then the price can be justified. Currently, I'm not fully satisfied with the value of the price, but I'm hopeful that it will improve.

When it comes to determining price, the pre-sales team interacts with the customer's primary integration team and the price is negotiated based on the specific usage of the system. 

Pricing cannot be shared because it varies depending on the client's engagement with MuleSoft and subscription.

I don't have any visibility on the licensing and therefore cannot speak to the exact cost of the product.

We are working with a platinum tier and have an unlimited core. It's my understanding is that there are no additional costs beyond the licensing fee itself. 

It is extremely high, and I would rate it one out of ten.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten since it is expensive from a Zimbabwean perspective. There are no additional costs apart from the licensing costs.

I'm not sure about the solution's pricing. 

We originally signed a three-year licensing agreement.

There's room for improvement on the licensing. They could do better.

The price of Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is very high.

The solution makes users pay integration fees.

You need to pay extra to get proper analytics. It's a separate fee.

The product is expensive.

I would rate the product's pricing a seven-point five out of ten. 

I'm unsure about licensing costs because I'm not the person who handles this. But, ballpark, it's probably somewhere around $300,000-$400,000 or something like that.

The licensing fees are approximately $80,000 USD per year and there are costs for additional functionality, as well as premiums for connectors to systems such as Oracle and SAP.  You're not obligated but it is better to buy premium and official connectors, although they cost approximately $25,000 per year.

The product is highly priced compared to other advanced software. It is affordable only for tier-one customers.

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

I would rate the pricing of this solution a seven, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. My opinion is that it's a bit expensive but they do offer a lot.

I would rate the pricing a six out of ten. It's not very expensive, reasonably priced. There are no additional costs. 

I want MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager to be cheaper because when you scale up, it becomes very costly. Price-wise, I'd give it a seven out of ten.

Anypoint is the most expensive solution on the market, as far as I know, though it's also the most capable.

The product is cheap and similar to Apigee or Azure.

The pricing for this solution is cheaper than GCP and Bluemix.

The licensing model is based on how many cores are used. It is a very simple licensing scheme.

Consider cloud vs. on-premise. Have a good vision of your medium term needs so you can plan for growth. Develop an API/integration roadmap

The solution is quite expensive. 

The pricing could be better.

We pay a licensing fee on a monthly basis. 

Licensing costs are reasonable. 

The licensing costs for the solution are quite high.

It's a per core pricing, maybe if your number of cores raise up quickly prices can escalate.

The pricing is very expensive, although you get a lot of power from the product. We're just scratching the surface of it.

The price is a bit expensive. It's hard to budget.