It is a scalable solution. We have more than 1,00,000 customers of the solution.

At present, we do not have any scalability use cases as we do not have any customers using the solution. The other times when we implemented an Office 365 account for a customer and we keep working with that. There are 1,500 users for my main customer and from my company, there are forty people.

Unfortunately, I don't have experience with the tool's scalability. So I can't say whether it's good, or should be better. We only have one partly on-premise and partly cloud solution, and we do not use the scalability features. Approximately 30,000 users use Skyhigh Security in our company, and we do not have plans to increase the number of users.

The stability of MVISION Cloud is fine. You can use whatever service with whatever number of users you want. There is a very good map to see all the services that you are receiving. You can always see what is happening, but the users never know if there is anything happening in the back end of the servers.

We have approximately 15 users using this solution in my organization.

As a cloud solution, it's easily scalable. 

You can spin up an instance of something in the cloud or cloud providers a lot faster than deploying network infrastructure switches, routers, and all that stuff. Plus, you can tier down. There's a lot of flexibility you can do with cloud services versus native on-prem services.

Skyhigh Security is a scalable solution.

The scalability seems to be good. A company that would like to expand it, should be able to do si without issues. 

My team uses 500 MB of traffic, so to be honest, Skyhigh Security hasn't been tested that much, but with that kind of traffic, it's a good solution. For the use cases at the moment, Skyhigh Security is pretty scalable.

It is definitely scalable.

I rate Skyhigh nine out of 10 for scalability. You can add as many servers as you want to a cluster.

We have approximately 7,000 users using this solution in my organization.

Skyhigh Security is a scalable solution.

No. Since I am able to use my Blue Coat Logs (which encompasses every system on and off my network) I just have one location that I download my Blue Coat logs and then upload them to Skyhigh.

No.

The scalability is fine. We work with Fortinet too and Fortinet doesn't work like McAfee. McAfee does more than Fortinet.

My impression is that it's easy to scale this solution. In my opinion, this solution is most suitable for medium-sized businesses.

It's not software that you can install. Scalability is on McAfee's end. It's not on the end-user or the partner or any of them, as it's a cloud service basically. However, it scales to meet your company's needs.

We have about ten customers currently using the solution.

We have been able to provide Skyhigh solutions for customers of single office companies, as well as larger global companies, without any issues.

The scalability is pretty good. The only thing we have faced is that sometimes, randomly, the portal becomes too slow. We only have between 100 and 150 users of the portal, which is a fairly small number, but scalability is not really an issue.

In terms of extent of use, it will monitor all the cloud usage in the company, whether there are 100k or 200k users. It will monitor everything, whatever comes from the logs, and present the data in an understandable format.

I haven't really attempted to scale the solution. 

The product scales quite well. If you need to expand the solution you can.

We have several customers on the product currently.

We would like to increase usage, however, in Serbia, many clients still prefer on-premises solutions.

We have not tried to expand the solution. There are 40 users using it in our organization.

Scalability on the cloud is something that needs improvement.

Our company has about 50,000 employees.

We have 14,000 users using this solution, all of the employees in the company. Everybody has it installed on their laptops or their desktops.

I don't have any issues with the scalability. You have to do the sizing before they implement it afterward. 

You have other solutions that have to increase the volume of usage.

We have several large clients that are using it.

We have had no problems in terms of scalability.

We have a team of about forty people who use it. There is the DLP team, the various tenant cloud security administration team, and we also have our staff that uses it.

We've had problems with scalability. We have 2000 users.

I have also encountered scalability issues.

Some logging was turned on that filled up the log file shares very quickly; it took some time to determine the cause of the issue and remediate it.

No.

No issues with scalability.

We used this as an internal solution, so I can’t reasonably address scalability.

It is meant for large organizations and it will support more than 10,000 users.

Yes.

No.

Scalability is no problem. It is cluster able so I can use many devices. We have small companies in Hungary, usually some 1000 users, but we have one simple appliance. It can deal with many users. I assume even 50,000 users would not be a problem for this product. 

No scalability issues.

The solution can scale if you need it to. A company shouldn't have any issues expanding it.

We have one or two customers that use it at this time.

No, since I am able to use my blue coat logs.

No issues.

No.

No.

No.

No.

No.

Yes.