This specific version of this MySQL has been battle tested for a long time. Any issues are known issues and we pretty much don't have any problems when they're in production. So it's very stable. When we picked simple switch demand, again, these things came up. But it was quickly resolved. So I guess that's the benefit of going with open source and seeing all those problems ahead of time in source code and having the ability to fix them.

I haven't experienced any bad things.

I haven’t seen any problems with the solution’s stability and I would rate the stability a ten on ten. It is a very stable tool.

I would rate the stability around seven to eight. They should improve the stability.

It's reliable. I never lost any data, which you anyways shouldn't. I'd rate it a ten out of ten in terms of stability because we never had the slightest problem. We are not in a challenging environment, but I haven't had any problems.

I rate the stability of MySQL an eight out of ten.

In my past two years of MySQL experience, I found no bugs or breakdowns. It works completely fine.

Stability is crucial, and it's influenced not just by the inherent features of the database system, but also by how the application team writes queries. If queries are poorly written or not optimized, it can affect stability significantly. While logging can help, improper usage, such as logging entire tables instead of specific fields, can also impact stability. Therefore, ensuring stability requires a holistic approach that considers both the database infrastructure and how the application interacts with it.

I would rate its stability capabilities eight out of ten.

MySQL is a stable tool. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I would rate the stability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. We have a team of three DBAs supporting and maintaining this product.

It has very good stability. We haven't had any issues with it.

MySQL is a stable solution.

MySQL has good stability.

I rate the solution a six or seven out of ten for stability.

MySQL is stable and fast. 

The solution is stable. 

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten. We can create a database user schema. It's quite easy to update and remove in case anything happens. Backing up is quite easy. We have security features for the backup.

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. It does break down a little at times. 

Its stability is quite good. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. 

I would rate MySQL's stability a ten out of ten. 

MySQL is good for small to medium sizes. Also, it has built-in security features. 

The solution is a very stable product. We have had no reason to be concerned about its stability.

It is very stable.

I rate the solution's stability a ten.

We haven’t encountered any serious stability issues with MySQL.

However, as with all systems, you need to keep your database “tidy”, making sure to optimize it, clean it and avoid corrupt files.

For critical projects, it may be wise to have redundancy by having two servers synced all the time.

The stability of MySQL is good.

I rate the stability of MySQL a ten out of ten.

MySQL is reliable. If you are talking about it in terms of relational databases, MySQL is pretty stable. If you want to go ahead with a quite secure database like any PCI database or a customer-related database or even financial data, it's still feasible to migrate to MySQL. 

In terms of stability I think MySQL is categorized as a stable product. We have customers who are using MySQL as its database as an online application and it's like an online store. So it means that the work is quite heavy but we are using MySQL for it. 

I’ve had an issue where an InnoDB database grew too big and got corrupted. I was unable to recover it because there was not enough space on the server either. Be sure to have enough space.

It is a very stable solution. I deployed the product six years ago, and it still works fine.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten since it has been running flawlessly.

My impression of the stability of this solution is that it is quite good.

It's a stable solution.

The solution has proven to be quite stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The stability is really good. I haven't had any issues with it.

I have found the development tools to be highly stable in MySQL.

This product is stable. I'm very satisfied with the performance. 

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable in terms of performance.

MySQL has a reputation for stability, and that is one of the reasons it is so popular. Because it is easily available, just works, and can be integrated reasonably easily into other software, it is often the default platform of choice. 

It has been around for years, and chances are it will be around for the next 10 years or so, as new versions continue to evolve.

We have optimized and stabilized the solution over a period of eight to six months.

I would say that MySQL is definitely stable, but its scalability has yet to be tested. I cannot say right now.

There were no issues with stability

The solution is stable.

The stability could be better. It's not as stable as I would prefer it to be. 

It was originally designed as freeware, as an open-source project, and the community wrote the solution. However, they've made it worse over time.

That said, the performance is pretty good.

The solution is stable but there is an issue with memory consumption at times.

We have not had any problems with stability.

It is stable, and in fact, it's more stable than PostgreSQL. Also, recovery is faster.

The stability of MySQL is good.

It is stable.

For the scale at which my systems are operating, the software is stable. We are at most dealing with less than 10 million rows of data across all tables, and concurrent connections under 200 at our peak loads.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten. The stability is good.

Everything that works with MySQL is stable. If it's a bug, it's due to the developer who has miswritten a piece of code. The code itself is perfect. It's the application of people who attempt to make changes where the issues come in.

The solution is stable.

When it comes to stability SQL server is better than MySQL. This is an area they could improve.

It is stable. We are not dealing with a huge database. Our database is not more than 1 TB, so we didn't find any problem.

MySQL is a very stable product.

When configured correctly, no stability issues.

There were no stability issues.

No, MySQL has always been a stable database. If there are sufficient resources on the server to run the database it will do fine.

I have found the free version to be stable. 

It is a stable RDBMS. There is no doubt about that.

It is stable.

It could be more stable.

I've had no problems with stability and its recovery processing, error processing, and things along those lines have been fine.  We always use Java applications and the JDBC drivers work fine.

I haven't had any issues at all with its reporting or its transaction processing, or anything else. 

No, it is rock solid.

It is very stable.

The stability is good. Neither we or our clients have had to deal with bugs, glitches or crashes. Everyone's been satisfied with it. Stability is one of its best features.

There were no issues with stability.

There were no stability issues.

We have seen the corruption of data in replication when used with filters and also, with the growing data response time dwindles.

The solution is very stable. 

The stability is fine. 

So far, it has been pretty stable and I haven't had any problems. We plan to continue using it in the future.

My customers haven't mentioned having any problems with stability. 

As with any good DBMS, MySQL requires periodic DBA maintenance. If you leave a MySQL database with no supervision of a DBA for enough time, files become too fragmented and they may turn corrupt beyond rescue.

It's a pretty stable product for what I needed it to do.

The solution works extremely well. It is easy to install and works on any platform. The price is good because we utilize various versions of the software/DB.

Pretty much since we have our own in-house SQL branch, the administrators are there, so they take care of the stability with the product. As far as I've seen, there really hasn't been much of an issue with stability.

No. Not on the MySQL site.

I did not encounter any issues with stability.

No issues.

No, there are only strategies applied by a data scale interval (less than 200 go, less than 1 to, and more than 15 to).

Yes, several unexplained crashes caused dissatisfaction from users.

With each release of MySQL Server was useful for any little problems that users detected, so I would say it's quite stable.

For sure, the solution is very stable. 

The solution is relatively stable.

No, never.

Compared to the other database solutions, there were no stability issues as such.

There were no stability issues.

There have been no stability issues yet.

The solution is able to be scaled but it depends on your Microsoft configuration. I would recommend this solution for small businesses.

It's pretty rock solid and we've had no issues with instability.

The stability is fantastic, it has been 100%.

MySQL is a stable product.

So far, so good due to limited clients at the moment.

There were no stability issues.

No issues.

It is stable.

There have been some problems with big table operations.

No.

We do not have any issues with the stability of MySQL.

No, I’d say this is the best.

It has been perfectly stable for us.

No issues encountered.

I have no stability problems.

It is stable.

No issues.

An overload of sessions, or long running queries. can cause the servers to be unusable.

There were no stability issues.

We did encounter stability issues.

There were no stability issues.