MySQL Other Solutions Considered
We did look at MongoDB, but it wasn't what we needed, so we decided we go with something a little more conventionally established, and MySQL absolutely fitted the bill. We didn't need anything else. We got some colleagues who used Oracle, but it's expensive and quite difficult to use.
View full review »AB
reviewer2089122
Associate Consultant at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
The solution is good for smaller data or new users. If you are maintaining large data and want to build a fully-furnished application, then you have to use something else like PostgreSQL.
View full review »With my previous employer, we used Oracle.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
MySQL
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about MySQL. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SG
Satishbabu Gunukula, Oracle ACE
Works
We looked at an SQL Server and Mongo DB.
View full review »ND
reviewer1456815
Specialist Geosciences Data Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
As a data analyst, I am not in operations and don't have a say in which products we use.
View full review »We do evaluate other solutions. We also use other products, such as Oracle's SQL server.
When a trace comes for MySQL, we will check mostly the cost of installation and the cost for maintaining everything. We are choosing MySQL over the others that are actually licensed solutions mostly due to the fact that MySQL is free.
View full review »When we started using MySQL, it was more or less the best Open Source RDBMS for web projects. Today, you have multiple options, such as PostgreSQL, SQLite and MariaDB, therefore the choice for a newcomer should be based on their project needs.
View full review »Looked at Microsoft SQL Server and PostgreSQL.
View full review »MySQL was one of the tools I was introduced to from the very beginning when I was in school. Though I knew about Microsoft SQL Server, the lectures in my school did not introduce me to it since more focus was placed on MySQL. I find MySQL easier to use compared to Microsoft SQL Server.
We didn't evaluate anything before choosing this solution. However, there are a few new products coming up that are growing in popularity and we will need to research them. Products like the Cockroach DB, Nuo DB, etc. are on our radar to be evaluated in the future.
View full review »LK
Lawrence Katuruza
Systems Administrator at Dairibord
AC
goforitandy
IT Consultant at Woohoogeeks
Yes, but for Moodle Learning sites, SQL Server is more complex, and is not multi-platform, Oracle is not recommended for Moodle, but the nearest to MySQL is ProstgreSQL. MySQL is reliable and easy to use.
View full review »We evaluated MS Access, SQLite, PostgreSQL, FireBird, and Oracle.
View full review »JK
James Kulundu
Data Analyst at KPMG East Africa
I also use PostgreSQL.
View full review »MW
Mac Wang
Project Manager at Realnux
We evaluated other databases and products, including EnterpriseDB and PostgreSQL. The latter was scalable, but it wasn't easy to use. MySQL is much easier to use and install. Before MySQL merged with Oracle, our software engineers were very satisfied.
View full review »TB
reviewer1788699
Managing Director at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
I evaluated Oracle Database.
View full review »KV
Karel Van Der Walt
Data Architect at ACPAS Loan Management Software
It is always compared with PostgreSQL and Microsoft SQL Server.
View full review »MM
Muhammad Nurazhan Moin
Senior Web Manager at a university with 501-1,000 employees
I’d been using other database systems like Microsoft’s SQL Server and Oracle Database before trying out MySQL. There are forks of MySQL maintained outside of Oracle, like MariaDB and Aurora (by Amazon Web Services). I have not really tried them but I don’t expect very big differences; in fact, for most use cases you may not observe any difference. There would be the few unique features in MariaDB and Aurora that are not present in the original MySQL feature set (I know there are but don’t remember the specifics).
View full review »AR
AlmiroRocha
Information Technology Infrastructure Manager at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
This is the product that was proposed to us and we implemented it.
View full review »HT
Haim Tzadok
Co-Founder/CEO at Grigale LTD
MariaDB, MySQL Support Services by Percona.
We evaluated MSSQL, Oracle DB, Informix, and MariaDB.
View full review »I usually look at MySQL, PostgreSQL and Oracle.
View full review »RS
reviewer1252344
COO at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
We had been on SQL Server and Oracle, and a subset of our customers wanted us to switch and use MySQL. We explored what that transition would take and then implemented it.
View full review »MariaDB/Galera.
View full review »IR
reviewer1392807
Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We have also used PhpStorm and DataGrip.
View full review »We have evaluated and used different products like SQLite. It depends on the requirements and the needs of the project.
View full review »There were not a lot of other options open to us.
View full review »I wasn't involved as this predates me at the organization, but today if this re-happens MySQL won't be the best choice.
We did evaluate other solutions, mainly PostGreSQL, which is also a very good product.
We run a benchmark comparison first, then we run a small lab with the development of a small solution with both toolsets (MySQL and PostGreSQL).
In this development comparison, we found that the winner is MySQL. MySQL toolset for development offers much more coverage for both PHP and C# development.
View full review »N/A.
View full review »There were many options.
View full review »It always depends on the scenarios of the requirement - what all the current scenarios come from. Are these application teams or is that someone who is just getting the product? If someone majorly bunt because they don't want to use a single point of data, we may end up choosing any other solution.
Usually, we would pick a MySQL because of our DBS, because we know how we can boot up or pick on a use case.
View full review »There are a lot of alternative to paid features. It's very hard to find support for this feature.
View full review »Yes, but commercial ones (ManageEngine, EasyVista, Remedyforce).
View full review »AA
Antonio Arcucci
CEO at a computer software company with 1-10 employees
Yes, I have evaluated other database solutions. I have evaluated PostgreSQL and MongoDB.
We looked at Oracle and PostgreSQL.
View full review »I did evaluate other solutions, but MySQL stood out because of its ease of use. Perhaps my prior experience has made me be biased towards MySQL.
View full review »No, because this is bundled with cPanel.
View full review »We looked at the Microsoft SQL Server.
View full review »SQL Server, Oracle XE, MariaDB.
View full review »DM
reviewer1435281
IT at a construction company with 201-500 employees
We did not evaluate other products.
View full review »This product’s active-active cluster feature was the reason for choosing it.
One of the reasons PostgreSQL was not considered – a decision taken before I joined the company - was its lack of mature multi-master cluster support. It also lacked other popular ports (e.g. MariaDB, Percona, etc. in MySQL).
View full review »We also looked at Microsoft SQL Server.
View full review »We also looked at PostgreSQL.
View full review »Yes, we checked MongoDB, PostgreSQL and MariaDB.
We used Oracle and SQL Server, but their prices and licensing were so expensive.
View full review »I thought about other Open Sources, but I chose MySQL, which I have already used.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
MySQL
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about MySQL. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.