Tricentis NeoLoad Primary Use Case
I have used Tricentis NeoLoad in two of my S/4HANA implementation projects, focusing on Transport Management and Finance & Tax modules. The objective was to assess the performance, stability, and scalability of the applications, ensuring solution capability to handle anticipated loads under both standard and stress conditions.
View full review »SR
Sanket Sunil Randive
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Our primary use case for Tricentis NeoLoad is performance testing and engineering, where we test or create scripts for different web-based applications on Tricentis NeoLoad. We also do multi-user testing on the tool and server monitoring to see how the servers behave. We also hook our CI/CD pipeline with Azure and Tricentis NeoLoad to trigger the test, then collect test statistics.
View full review »SN
SridharNellore
Performance Test Lead at HTC
My company uses Tricentis NeoLoad for critical projects, so its use cases vary. To make it short, the protocols and web services include the areas around Tricentis NeoLoad.
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis NeoLoad
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
I worked for a real estate company and we used this solution to deal with scripting and anything related to documentation; uploading, downloading, etc. The product was built on .NET technology. We also used the product for mobile device performance testing. We had a few devices sitting on the Perfecto cloud, and we integrated those via NeoLoad API. NeoLoad has an integration framework in place for Perfecto so we were able to develop a few scripts, execute them and monitor the performance on a mobile device. I'm a senior test lead.
View full review »CB
Chinnikrishna Bandi
Consultant at Capgemini Invent
The primary use case of the solution is for performance testing.
View full review »We use the solution for performance testing.
View full review »Tricentis NeoLoad was for a sports client of ours, and they had a web based application, and that application had a lot of APIs floating into a lot of sports applications. They were sports-based solutions, where you have people going to baseball sporting events, registering for the events, getting tickets, etc. That was the load that we tested with Tricentis NeoLoad.
View full review »AK
Ashish-Kulkarni
Supervisor, Quality Assurance at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We use the solution for load and performance testing activities for web-based applications, Siebel CRM, and Oracle E-Business Suite.
View full review »We are primarily testing APIs but also testing the UI in some cases. In my last job, I also developed a plugin to enable NeoLoad to measure the end-user experience. If you have a modern web application, you usually only exchange JSON files between the client and the server. On the client side, you will render the JSON information to an HTML side or a dynamic DOM structure.
NeoLoad is used for testing the response time, which is not the same as the time it takes for the user to see the page. When the JSON document arrives on the client side, the client has to render the information. If you are considering the user experience from the end user's perspective, you are not interested in how long it takes to get the JSON. You want to know how long it will take to get the JSON and see the information on the page.
NeoLoad can't do this because it does not render the data from the server. The browser engine uses considerable RAM, so we cannot simulate many users simultaneously. We enabled NeoLoad to control a typical test. For example, a QF Test like Robot Framework tests the web UI. It starts and renders the application to measure how long it takes to see some special information on the page.
These response times are fed into NeoLoad through a data exchange API, enabling us to visualize the actual user experience inside NeoLoad. That's NeoLoad's primary advantage. It has incredible APIs to implement special additional features or plugins you need for special applications.
DD
Denise Duchesney
Senior Manager Test Automation at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts
We had three specific use cases we targeted Tricentis NeoLoad for. The first was for services, the second for terminal emulation mainframe applications, and the third was for the web. We are looking for a more cost effective, efficient (low code) alternative to our current framework.
View full review »AF
reviewer1584207
Test Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We are using it for performance testing.
View full review »AK
Abishek Kota
Deputy Manager at BSH
I am a senior performance engineer providing end-to-end performance testing. This involves gathering all non-functional requirements, creating a test plan, and creating a test strategy document. From there, we would start our benchmark and baseline testing based on the tool and protocol of the specific client in order to gather the scripting and the load testing. NeoLoad helps us identify bottlenecks and memory leaks which will help us increase the hardware capacity for the client and/or look at things on the software end including scalability, reliability, testing, and failure testing.
View full review »PB
Patrik Badkar
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We used it for putting the load on the system. For example, for a big sale of an online marketplace, we created the scripts with performance testing tools such as Neotys and LoadRunner. We used to search for a product and add it to the cart. We used to capture all this traffic through these tools, and then, we used to do the real-time testing. So, we used to simulate the real-world user scenario. For example, if the company was expecting around 20,000 users on a specific day, we used to simulate the volume of 20,000 users on the application.
The deployment model depends on a client's requirements and licensing. If we have a sufficient budget, we always go for the SaaS model. If we have a limitation of licensing, then we prefer to go for on-premises deployment. We usually need to get support from the admin team to set up everything. We used to take care of this aspect so that the support team will be able to do things on our behalf, such as setting up things in their environment.
One of our use cases, it was Oracle E-Business Suite (Oracle EBS) application testing. The other one was a migration project for SAP HANA. In those two use cases, we needed to perform benchmarking and increase the coverage from an end-to-end point of view rather than just focusing on the API endpoints.
We had to automate some of the Oracle form-specific transactions using NeoLoad, as we wanted to expand the coverage. So, I used NeoLoad as a hybrid solution alongside JMeter. Initially, the majority of the volume was on JMeter, but for the Oracle forms usage, which was low, we utilized a low-volume license from NeoLoad.
View full review »We use Tricentis NeoLoad to test risk with API calls and make some small automation with the API calls using small Java scripts to take data from the file.
The solution is on-premises and we use a web dashboard which is SaaS but we use on-premise because we mostly work with the clients in its sensitive data that's required, like, only on-premise usage.
The solution is on-premises and we use a web dashboard which is Software as a Service. We prefer on-premise usage because we mostly work with clients dealing with sensitive data that requires on-premise usage.
View full review »We use the tool to do POC level activity.
View full review »AN
reviewer1609227
Vice President - Global Head of Delivery at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
We use Tricentis NeoLoad for performance testing across our product lines.
JB
reviewer1357284
Director, IT DevOps & Quality Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
We use this tool for load testing on web-browser based APIs.
View full review »We use the product for performance and load testing.
View full review »This solution is mostly used by our customers to monitor the performance of the networks or of the server site.
SG
reviewer1712994
Performance Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The primary use case is for web applications and also SAP GUI—not SAP Applications but the UI version of SAP. For both these areas, it was working fine from the NeoLoad side.
The solution has been moved to the cloud version.
View full review »We use Tricentis NeoLoad for performance testing purposes, like load testing and stress testing.
View full review »SP
Shivashanker Patil
Senior Performance Engineer at Ascend Learning
Used for performance testing of applications on QA environments as well as production environments. NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.
View full review »MB
MarkusBonner
Release Test Manager at a tech company with 201-500 employees
We primarily use the solution for load testing. Our focus is not so much performance testing. We focus more on load testing, which does inadvertently include performance testing, however.
View full review »AM
Anuradha Mankhair
Automation Test Engineer and Team Lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
We were customers of NeoLoad and I'm an automation test engineer and team lead.
View full review »GN
reviewer1279947
Performance Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We use NetLoad for two different types of testing. We use it for load testing and automation testing. We use it test out the user experience.
View full review »We use this solution because we want to know the difference between two different tools to suggest for our clients.
View full review »It is primarily used for load testing, stress testing and performance testing. It is a very good product.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Tricentis NeoLoad
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.