Neotys NeoLoad Pros and Cons

The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.

The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.

The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.

It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.

NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.

Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.

I like the scripting and parameterization features.

Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.

Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.

I would like to see support for auto-correlations.

NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.

Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue.

While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.