Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing
Tricentis NeoLoad is much cheaper compared to other tools like LoadRunner. The solution helps save in other areas like scalability, integrations, usability, and the required manpower.
View full review »SR
Sanket Sunil Randive
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I don't have information on the licensing cost of Tricentis NeoLoad because my manager handles that. From a testing perspective and based on company requirements, the current license is for one thousand users.
SN
SridharNellore
Performance Test Lead at HTC
Tricentis NeoLoad doesn't offer different pricing models. In our company, when we go with short-term projects, Tricentis NeoLoad serves as an investment tool.
From a licensing cost perspective, I rate the product an eight out of ten since it is a cheap solution that looks costly for certain areas.
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis NeoLoad
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
A couple of years ago, I paid around $USD9,000 per year for 250 users. The license fee includes web protocol, STTP protocol, and API. There might be an additional cost if you want Citrix, RDP or SAP.
CB
Chinnikrishna Bandi
Consultant at Capgemini Invent
The solution requires an annual license.
View full review »The solution is quite expensive. But users can select the features they require and pay accordingly.
View full review »Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner.
Pricing is really less compared to Micro Focus LoadRunner, but once this product goes under the Tricentis umbrella, we don't know how much are they charging for it now. I have not looked into the most recent pricing for Tricentis NeoLoad.
View full review »AK
Ashish-Kulkarni
Supervisor, Quality Assurance at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The tool is not cheap. However, the cost is a bit lower than other tools like LoadRunner.
View full review »DD
Denise Duchesney
Senior Manager Test Automation at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts
Tricentis NeoLoad price is a benefit of using this tool, it is less expensive than some of the other solutions.
View full review »AF
reviewer1584207
Test Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I'd rate it a seven out of ten in terms of pricing.
View full review »AK
Abishek Kota
Deputy Manager at BSH
We were able to set up per user basis licensing.
View full review »Neotys offers various licensing plans to suit every business. The free version comes with 50 users with all protocols included for small load tests. The paid licensing plan depends on number of virtual users needed (to simulate the load), duration, the protocols under test, number of concurrent applications being tested, cloud usage etc. For example, the licence can be availed even for a day, a month, or a year depending on the need. In that sense, the licence cost can range from $1500 to >$20000. A general rule of thumb is the longer the licence period and the greater number of virtual users results in a lower price over the long term.
View full review »PB
Patrik Badkar
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Its licensing cost is very less.
View full review »NeoLoad now has a much more flexible licensing process. Earlier, it was hectic with people. Nowadays, licensing itself is a killer for most products.
For example, we purchased the Tableau license, and they had this on-premise licensing server setup, which is not working at all. So we had to ask them to give us a cloud license, and the discussion is still going on. They are trying to charge us additional stuff for Tableau. So our clients are now in a situation where they might abandon the product due to licensing issues, making it complex. People don't want to go through this. Really, it's easier to use the tool, but licensing itself takes a lot of unwanted complications.
So, with NeoLoad, we gave feedback and asked them to simplify the licensing model, and they came back with a better proposal.
View full review »We used a 60-day trial with ten hours of work per month. The cost is increasing each year.
View full review »RR
RajaRao
Associate at Tech Mahindra Limited
I'm not exactly sure what the pricing is as it differs from client to client.
That said, LoadRunner is expensive and NeoLoad is less expensive whereas JMeter is free.
View full review »SP
Shivashanker Patil
Senior Performance Engineer at Ascend Learning
Compared to HP LoadRunner, NeoLoad is cheaper.
View full review »AN
reviewer1609227
Vice President - Global Head of Delivery at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Pricing for Tricentis NeoLoad could be cheaper because, at the moment, it's expensive. For a year, the solution cost us a lot of money, in particular, more than $50,000.
View full review »JB
reviewer1357284
Director, IT DevOps & Quality Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based.
View full review »NeoLoad is expensive, but to my knowledge, it's better than LoadRunner.
View full review »The licensing model is very flexible which supports a broad range of budgets, from small projects to enterprise-level setups.
View full review »The licensing for this solution is renewable yearly, and covers all available features and technical support.
SG
reviewer1712994
Performance Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees.
View full review »Purchase a few extra licenses to allow for flexibility, utilizing the team server as much as possible.
View full review »The price of the tool is competitive.
View full review »As you add more protocols and monitoring it does get expensive.
View full review »It's priced based on the numbers of VUs, virtual users, that your needs require. The free edition gives you 50 VUs. The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing. Cloud VUs can be rented on-demand for bursts of higher capacity testing needs without permanent purchase.
View full review »We didn't negotiate the price. To give perspective, we went from spending three million dollars to 160 thousand dollars, which is a huge saving and good value.
View full review »Tricentis NeoLoad is not an expensive solution, but it can be quite expensive if we need a license for load testing, depending on the organization level.
On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap, I rate Tricentis NeoLoad's pricing a seven out of ten.
SP
Shivashanker Patil
Senior Performance Engineer at Ascend Learning
The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.
View full review »Neotys provides a free evaluation licence to use NeoLoad with up to 50 virtual users and all protocols included.
The product licence remains cheaper than HP LoadRunner, for example.
Compared to LoadRunner, NeoLoad licensing of users is very cost effective. The cost is very simple and well defined and you can check it on the Neotys site.
View full review »Low in cost when compared to tools like HP LoadRunner. Talking about licensing, they offer a cool feature that enables us to split the Vuser bundle across multiple machines. In other words, we can have multiple controllers running multiple load tests at the same time.
View full review »Licence cost is very attractive compared to other vendor tools and also there are many license alternatives. Licence costs are good enough compared to the benefit of the tool to the company.
View full review »The best advice I can give you is to go for a perpetual licensing option so you just pay per user.
View full review »Compared to other tools in the market, this is priced moderately. However, I see a lot of short term performance activities, and the license costs are higher in comparison. Most of the time, I just use JMeter in such cases.
View full review »At the time of purchase, it was a competition between Neotys and HP. Neotys’ licensing model was also different from HP, although HP was transitioning into a similar model as Neotys while we were going through the process.
View full review »Through collaboration with Neotys, we have free licenses for 50 users. I think we would buy more if they could provide hands on training for newly added features to specific sets of people.
View full review »It is fairly cost effective when compared to the cost of LoadRunner.
View full review »We evaluated other products of similar nature as well other team member’s prior experiences with similar products.
View full review »AM
Anuradha Mankhair
Automation Test Engineer and Team Lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
We purchased a two-year license but broke the contract after 18 months.
View full review »The market always pays for the one who comes up with something new and that is easy to customize.
View full review »It is cheaper than other solutions.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Tricentis NeoLoad
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.