Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing

Test Process Consultant - PeerSpot reviewer
SME (Subject Matter Expert) at Maersk

Tricentis NeoLoad is much cheaper compared to other tools like LoadRunner. The solution helps save in other areas like scalability, integrations, usability, and the required manpower.

View full review »
SR
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

I don't have information on the licensing cost of Tricentis NeoLoad because my manager handles that. From a testing perspective and based on company requirements, the current license is for one thousand users.

View full review »
SN
Performance Test Lead at HTC

Tricentis NeoLoad doesn't offer different pricing models. In our company, when we go with short-term projects, Tricentis NeoLoad serves as an investment tool.

From a licensing cost perspective, I rate the product an eight out of ten since it is a cheap solution that looks costly for certain areas.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis NeoLoad
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Mayaskar Chandrashekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Lead at Birlasoft

A couple of years ago, I paid around $USD9,000 per year for 250 users. The license fee includes web protocol, STTP protocol, and API. There might be an additional cost if you want Citrix, RDP or SAP.

View full review »
CB
Consultant at Capgemini Invent

The solution requires an annual license.

View full review »
Ayanda Mabombo - PeerSpot reviewer
Quality Engineer ( Performance) at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

The solution is quite expensive. But users can select the features they require and pay accordingly.

View full review »
GaneshMuralidharan - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Delivery Head at Vaisesika consulting

Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner.

Pricing is really less compared to Micro Focus LoadRunner, but once this product goes under the Tricentis umbrella, we don't know how much are they charging for it now. I have not looked into the most recent pricing for Tricentis NeoLoad.

View full review »
AK
Supervisor, Quality Assurance at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The tool is not cheap. However, the cost is a bit lower than other tools like LoadRunner.

View full review »
DD
Senior Manager Test Automation at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts

Tricentis NeoLoad price is a benefit of using this tool, it is less expensive than some of the other solutions.

View full review »
AF
Test Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

I'd rate it a seven out of ten in terms of pricing.

View full review »
AK
Deputy Manager at BSH

We were able to set up per user basis licensing.

View full review »
it_user467850 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Neotys offers various licensing plans to suit every business. The free version comes with 50 users with all protocols included for small load tests. The paid licensing plan depends on number of virtual users needed (to simulate the load), duration, the protocols under test, number of concurrent applications being tested, cloud usage etc. For example, the licence can be availed even for a day, a month, or a year depending on the need. In that sense, the licence cost can range from $1500 to >$20000. A general rule of thumb is the longer the licence period and the greater number of virtual users results in a lower price over the long term.

View full review »
PB
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Its licensing cost is very less.

View full review »
NalinGoonawardana - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Consultant ( Test automation - Performance testing) at TTC Global (TTC) at TTC at TTC Global

NeoLoad now has a much more flexible licensing process. Earlier, it was hectic with people. Nowadays, licensing itself is a killer for most products.

For example, we purchased the Tableau license, and they had this on-premise licensing server setup, which is not working at all. So we had to ask them to give us a cloud license, and the discussion is still going on. They are trying to charge us additional stuff for Tableau. So our clients are now in a situation where they might abandon the product due to licensing issues, making it complex. People don't want to go through this. Really, it's easier to use the tool, but licensing itself takes a lot of unwanted complications.

So, with NeoLoad, we gave feedback and asked them to simplify the licensing model, and they came back with a better proposal.

View full review »
Stas Radionov - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Manager at FirmTec

We used a 60-day trial with ten hours of work per month. The cost is increasing each year.

View full review »
RR
Associate at Tech Mahindra Limited

I'm not exactly sure what the pricing is as it differs from client to client.

That said, LoadRunner is expensive and NeoLoad is less expensive whereas JMeter is free.

View full review »
SP
Senior Performance Engineer at Ascend Learning

Compared to HP LoadRunner, NeoLoad is cheaper.

View full review »
AN
Vice President - Global Head of Delivery at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Pricing for Tricentis NeoLoad could be cheaper because, at the moment, it's expensive. For a year, the solution cost us a lot of money, in particular, more than $50,000.

View full review »
JB
Director, IT DevOps & Quality Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based.

View full review »
KrupaShree - PeerSpot reviewer
Programmer Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

NeoLoad is expensive, but to my knowledge, it's better than LoadRunner. 

View full review »
it_user406503 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Manager at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

The licensing model is very flexible which supports a broad range of budgets, from small projects to enterprise-level setups.

View full review »
GerardGanga - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager Business Solutions

The licensing for this solution is renewable yearly, and covers all available features and technical support.

View full review »
SG
Performance Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees.

View full review »
it_user367824 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant - Software Development and Integration at Sogeti Group

Purchase a few extra licenses to allow for flexibility, utilizing the team server as much as possible.

View full review »
it_user472641 - PeerSpot reviewer
Non Functional Test Manager at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

The price of the tool is competitive.

View full review »
it_user371118 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

As you add more protocols and monitoring it does get expensive.

View full review »
it_user380010 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Load Test Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

It's priced based on the numbers of VUs, virtual users, that your needs require. The free edition gives you 50 VUs. The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing. Cloud VUs can be rented on-demand for bursts of higher capacity testing needs without permanent purchase.

View full review »
it_user356646 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager Online Performance Engineering at Dell

We didn't negotiate the price. To give perspective, we went from spending three million dollars to 160 thousand dollars, which is a huge saving and good value.

View full review »
Ujwal Gaikwad - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Software Engineer at Nts automation labs pvt ltd

Tricentis NeoLoad is not an expensive solution, but it can be quite expensive if we need a license for load testing, depending on the organization level.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap, I rate Tricentis NeoLoad's pricing a seven out of ten.

View full review »
SP
Senior Performance Engineer at Ascend Learning

The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.

View full review »
it_user475548 - PeerSpot reviewer
Load Test Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees

Neotys provides a free evaluation licence to use NeoLoad with up to 50 virtual users and all protocols included.

The product licence remains cheaper than HP LoadRunner, for example.

View full review »
it_user464934 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Test Specialist, Performance Test Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Compared to LoadRunner, NeoLoad licensing of users is very cost effective. The cost is very simple and well defined and you can check it on the Neotys site.

View full review »
it_user371331 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technical Officer at PA Department of Human Services

Low in cost when compared to tools like HP LoadRunner. Talking about licensing, they offer a cool feature that enables us to split the Vuser bundle across multiple machines. In other words, we can have multiple controllers running multiple load tests at the same time.

View full review »
it_user269556 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Testing Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Licence cost is very attractive compared to other vendor tools and also there are many license alternatives. Licence costs are good enough compared to the benefit of the tool to the company.

View full review »
it_user307029 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

The best advice I can give you is to go for a perpetual licensing option so you just pay per user.

View full review »
it_user157959 - PeerSpot reviewer
Digital Performance Test Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Compared to other tools in the market, this is priced moderately. However, I see a lot of short term performance activities, and the license costs are higher in comparison. Most of the time, I just use JMeter in such cases.

View full review »
it_user367827 - PeerSpot reviewer
Web Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

At the time of purchase, it was a competition between Neotys and HP. Neotys’ licensing model was also different from HP, although HP was transitioning into a similar model as Neotys while we were going through the process.

View full review »
it_user467826 - PeerSpot reviewer
Performance Test Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Through collaboration with Neotys, we have free licenses for 50 users. I think we would buy more if they could provide hands on training for newly added features to specific sets of people.

View full review »
it_user461346 - PeerSpot reviewer
Performance Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

It is fairly cost effective when compared to the cost of LoadRunner.

View full review »
it_user344052 - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President of Technology at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

We evaluated other products of similar nature as well other team member’s prior experiences with similar products.

View full review »
AM
Automation Test Engineer and Team Lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

We purchased a two-year license but broke the contract after 18 months. 

View full review »
it_user488835 - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

The market always pays for the one who comes up with something new and that is easy to customize.

View full review »
it_user745425 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Quality Assurance Engineer with 10,001+ employees

It is cheaper than other solutions.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis NeoLoad
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.