NetApp SnapMirror Previous Solutions
When I joined this company, SnapMirror was already set up.
View full review »We have used multiple other storage solutions including RecoverPoint for our EMC VNX arrays. We've recently been using EMC high-end storage with SRDF, which can do a kind of real-time replication. It wasn't a matter of switching to NetApp, the product was purchased for a different purpose. We needed unified storage where SAN and NAS are provided from the same storage.
MS
Mircea Sandu
Solutions Architect at SC PROSERVICECORP SRL
I've been fortunate enough to work with almost all the major vendors in the enterprise storage area. I worked with Pure Storage years ago, and it is an awesome product I highly recommend. We did not continue with Pure Storage for my latest assignment and chose NetApp instead. NetApp is very good and almost on the same level compared to Pure Storage. Pure Storage is slightly better at what it does compared to NetApp. However, NetApp is more comprehensive, which means it has more features than Pure Storage, though Pure Storage is a more solid all-round product. But when compared with other storage technologies from other vendors, like HP, Dell's PowerVault, or PowerMax series, NetApp is a bit ahead. It's also ahead of others like Infinidat or IBM's storage arrays.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
NetApp SnapMirror
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about NetApp SnapMirror. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Our customers also use other solutions along with NetApp.
View full review »It is not to say I ONLY use NetApp. That is simply not true. I just prefer NetApp. I have implemented storage solutions from pretty much all vendors. It mostly comes down to a business decision of cost vs. benefit. NetApp is not cheap by any stretch but you do get what you pay for.
View full review »TE
Tom Evert Olsen
Senior Infrastructure Architect at Proact It Norge As
We've used other vendors from time to time, but it is more because of political issues - nothing technical.
View full review »AS
AbdulSalam
Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Bank Sohar
We did not previously use a different solution. It was entirely a different use case. Previously, we were using a Windows-based file server. We didn't have the high availability and replication to secondary site, also snap shot's capability, which is what we were looking for.
View full review »TF
TamirFahima
IT Infrastructure Manager at Afcon Holdings
Previously I did not use another solution. This is the only solution that I have used.
View full review »Yes i have used solution from HDS and Fujitsu and the company accquire Netapp and so their dont back more .
View full review »I did not previously use another solution.
View full review »BV
Balaji Venkatraman
Senior Storage Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
No - this is the best tool from Netapp and we never thought of any other tool. In fact, all additional features like Netapp Datamotion for vfilers use SnapMirror as their backend.
View full review »WG
reviewer691557
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at a government with 501-1,000 employees
We did previously use a different solution. We switched because the cost was so high.
View full review »No previous solution was used.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
NetApp SnapMirror
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about NetApp SnapMirror. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.