NetApp SnapMirror Room for Improvement

AbdulSalam
Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Bank Sohar
It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better. Our company is Oman, and there is a ticketing problem here. If there are issues, we have to go to the partner who did the implementation. We need to contact the partner, then the partner has to get the log, and then they will raise the ticket on our behalf. After that, the tech support team contacts the partner and then it gets to us. We would like to get support ourselves or the ability to directly log the ticket or even call without having to go through the partner. We want to report the problem to tech support directly and then take it from there. In terms of improvements for the solution, I think they already have a different product, AFF, where you can get much better performance and more combination as well as data security and data savings, if they have a different protocol already, which they are lacking now. View full review »
Alberto Alberti
Senior System Engineer at ICTeam
At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses. View full review »
Tom Evert Olsen
Senior Infrastructure Architect at Proact It Norge As
The product itself doesn't have any big issues. What is lacking and what we need to use other products for, is to have active data centers. You need to implement another solution for it, but that is also available from NetApp. So I don't think there is an option to put that into SnapMirror either. It's lacking that functionality but it's available with other solutions from the same vendor. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Dell EMC, Vision Solutions and others in Data Replication. Updated: December 2019.
389,978 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer598200
Senior Application Engineer Presales Support at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees
We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them. Currently, there is only a command-line interface, but some users would benefit from the inclusion of a graphical user interface. View full review »
TamirFahima
IT Infrastructure Manager at Afcon Holdings
This solution is stable but needs improvements with the network. In the next release, I would like to see data reduction included and WAN optimization. View full review »
reviewer691557
Senior Infrastructure Engineer with 201-500 employees
The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better. View full review »
Systemagr67
System Manager at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us. View full review »
reviewer829905
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
In the next release, I would like to get an active IP number solution. View full review »
reviewer957945
System Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
The price needs to be improved. It is not that it is too high, but it would be good to be reduced. There is new technology available that is using storage called NVMe with the drives. We are now using a scanning device called a Standard SATA Drive. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Dell EMC, Vision Solutions and others in Data Replication. Updated: December 2019.
389,978 professionals have used our research since 2012.