Netezza Analytics Previous Solutions
SK
Shiv Subramaniam Koduvayur
Project Manager at MAF Retail
Prior to this solution, we were using a Microsoft product. It was not performing well, and not really an adequate solution, which is why we switched.
View full review »RB
Balan R
Manager-Projects,Data Analyst & DBA at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We were using a different product. We switched it because of the cost of maintenance. We wanted to reduce the cost of maintenance and it helped to drastically reduce it by some 40 to 50%.
Rapidminer, R, DB2 intelligent miner, SSAS data mining were all tested for association rules. Rapidminer and R did not pass. They use matrix math, and cause +100x performance degradations. DB2 intelligent miner, SSAS data mining, and likely also NZA follows the original a prori methods of using sets, not matrices.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Hadoop
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Cloudera and others in Hadoop. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We have previously used Microsoft SQL server, but we switched because our business wants fast and reliable appliance like Netezza. Although MS SQL server is reliable but Netezza is known for it's MPP and performance when compared to other RDBMS appliances.
View full review »Unix, commodity server. Switched to check this technology.
View full review »Our customers mostly switch from traditional RDMs to appliances.
View full review »We previously used Mircosoft services such as Teradata. We were using Teradata for our data warehouse.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Hadoop
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Cloudera and others in Hadoop. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.