We previously used a different solution called AppScan Standard. We switched to Invicti because Gartner has a good rating for Invicti, and Invicti has a good vulnerability analysis compared to AppScan Standard.

We also use Burp Suite which is a UI-based tool that I also find to be user-friendly. We use both products so that in the case of false positives we can compare and verify. 

Depending on the use cases I've used, HCL AppScan and Burp Suite. It depends on the use case and the user's knowledge. All these products are based on the user's knowledge.

I usually use Invicti for official purposes, but in certain cases, we use Burp Suite for doing a ping test-related activity.

This was the starting point. We chose this because Troy Hunt (security advisor) had provided a positive and thorough review of this product on his blog.

We used this product along with some others (SkipFish, NMap, etc.) to fully test the security of our products.

We previously used a different tool, but it was also a demo, like Netsparker. We wanted to try Netsparker, so we moved to their demo.

For application security, we tried Netsparker, Accunetix, but this one has a free option and recommended Software from OWASP.

I have used Burp Suite Professional and Acunetix.

I switched to Netsparker just to try it and understand how it works.

We did not previously use a different solution. We started with Netsparker.

Since the time I am associated to this company, we have constantly used Netsparker as one of our tools.

We did not switch solutions, just tried different tools to see the results.

Yes, I have used Acunetix, and the reason I switched to Netsparker would be:

The performance I found on Acunetix was very slow. It would take like a day if I had to scan our web based application product. That is not reliable when you are working with those clients who want a quick response.

I have used Acunetix. The reason I switched to Netsparker would be that the performance I found on Acunetix was very slow. It would take something like a day if I had to scan our web-based application product. That is not reliable when you are working with clients who want a quick response regarding how the application performs.

We also use Micro Focus Fortify and I have not had a chance to compare the scans, but I prefer the interface and ease of use with Netsparker. It is really easy to configure and deploy, as well as communicate this to the client.

We use simultaneous products, but I found this to be the best of the lot.