It is quite stable. It is very robust. You can compare it to any old three-tier architecture solution. It is a much better solution. It is a much better approach. 

It is stable. Its reliability is very good. In the last three to four years, we have not faced any outages. It is smooth on the hardware side and the software side.

The stability is very good. In two years, we've had no issues - only drive and hardware issues, not software issues. 

The solution is stable. 

Nutanix is generally considered stable, but its performance can also be influenced by the type of hard drive used in the system.

It's very stable. We haven't had any issues with Nutanix.

It's quite stable. We have never had any downtime.

I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of stability. It is rock solid. It is not made by god. It is still man-built, so there are errors, but their support is excellent. If there are flaws in the new functions, they improve it really quickly. Afterward, it is okay.

The thing with the software is that you can test and test and test it, but in the end, the reality is that most software solutions get better after reaching the first customer. They get better and better by detecting errors. This is the same with Nutanix and other vendors. They track where the problems are, and if errors accumulate in a specific area, they have their task force internally focusing on these problems and fixing them. Pretty soon, in about three months' time, the problem is solved, and the fixes are released.

The solution’s stability has been really good. I haven't had any problems so far. Anytime there is a problem, it is invisible to the customer because everything continues to run on another node.

We have never faced any downtime or operational issues that we have had to escalate to the vendor, whether it be about challenges that we are facing and we need an upgrade, or there is a vulnerability or bug that needs to be fixed. Everything is currently running, everything is optimized.

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure is stable.

I rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. 

I've never had any issues with stability.

Nutanix Acropolis AOS is a reliable solution, it has not ever failed us.

It’s a stable solution.

The solution is very stable. We haven't had any issues. 

The solution’s stability is excellent.

NCI is stable. If the company continues to innovate and upgrade the product, I expect it will be a robust solution in the future. 

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure’s stability is awesome. Stability is one of the things that we appreciate more in Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure, as we don't have any downtime with the solution.

It is a robust and very stable solution.

It's stable. The design means we get an N+1 architecture for node failures. We haven't had any major downtime until now. We are good with the performance.

I'm very satisfied with the stability and performance of Nutanix. This solution is easy to maintain. You use the LCM module, press update, and it's done for you. It's wonderful because you don't have to do anything—it's almost too easy. I am the only one handling maintenance for and managing Nutanix. 

Unless you opt for the short-term support path (STS), stability is a given with LTS versions. You get not every feature available, immediately, but that is no concern for stable systems.

You cannot download older versions with known critical bugs. The Life Cycle Manager (LCM) supports you with checks to hint at known compatibility issues. I noticed the hint to update Nutanix Files in order to support the AOS upgrade I was planning. Directly in Prism Elements!

That is simply amazing. Of course, one would visit the "upgrade paths" and "software interoperability" pages in the support section of https://my.nutanix.com .

It is quite stable. We had no problems with it.

This solution is stable, which is one of the reasons why we are looking to move our entire set of applications into this architecture. There are a couple of issues in terms of patch updates, but overall, the performance is good. Our IT deployment and infrastructure management team is comprised of five or six people, one manager and mostly engineers. 

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure is stable.

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure is very stable.

When we started, it was not that stable. We were facing multiple issues. Now, Nutanix is very stable.

When Nutanix releases their upgrades, I then need to update to the latest upgrade and patch. Once I click the upgrade, it will automatically reboot the AOS one by one. There won't be any service disruption as well.

Nutanix Acropolis AOS is very stable.

Since we started it up, the only time that we had any problems on it or downtime, if I can put it that way, was literally to upgrade the memory. That's it.

In the last three years since it's been running, it was peace of mind. We didn't have any problems and even with Nutanix overseas, we had a faulty memory module and the system worked perfectly, and they sent us a new memory module. We sent the old memory module back and that process with Nutanix support was magnificent, zero frustrations.

This solution is very stable. I'm 100% satisfied with the stability. 

For maintenance, one person is enough. If you're looking at an IT environment, the same person who does the Active Directory can manage Nutanix as well. You don't need to hire a person who specializes in Nutanix. 

Nutanix Acropolis AOS is a very stable.

The solution is rock solid, no software issues or compatibility issues may be because we are using it over 

No, also the system does daily self-checks and comes up with warnings. Support can fix this without system downtime. Over time you learn from support sessions to fix thngs yourself. The tool chest (already there inside the Controller-VM) is really impressive.

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure is extremely stable.

There have been one or two bugs reported in the past one and a half years, but other than that, I don't see any issues with the product. It's quite stable.

Nutanix Acropolis AOS is stable, because we used it in a production environment. We didn't choose a test solution, e.g. we installed it in a stable environment.

It is stable so far. It is pretty new, and there are no issues.

The easiest way to explain the stability of Nutanix is to start it up and forget about it. We haven't had any problems with this solution. We've done a couple of tests and restarts and we've moved VMs from one machine to another machine. We tested the availability and we didn't have any problems with that either. The performance and stability of Nutanix is so good, it is almost unbelievable. 

Nutanix is a stable product.

The solution is certainly stable. 

Power supply and memory will affect stability, same as any other hardware vendor.

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure is reliable. 

NO issues with stability; had a few minor software bugs that were more annoying, but not disruptive.

This is so dramatically more stable than other hypervisor solutions I have used its almost hard to believe. I can do hypervisor upgrades on all my hosts with a click of a button while in production. No need to move or shut down guests or take hosts out of production, or plan off-hours maintenance windows. I don’t need to seek out updates or go extended periods of time because of a lack of awareness of updates. It’s literally as easy as you’d hope for or expect to have… probably more so.

I find Nutanix Acropolis AOS stable. In the beginning, we had some issues with its stability, but now, stability for it is good.

While the solution is stable, we find it difficult to update. I thought this should be easier to do, but we have encountered difficulty with updating the ESXi and Nutanix versions.

Since it is a high convert solution, we don't need any downtime because all the VMs are being moved to another node. So no downtime is required.

It is very stable and reliable.

This solution is stable.

We did not encounter any significant stability issues that I was aware of at my level.

Nutanix Acropolis AOS is stable. We didn't receive any concerns regarding any problems, The customers have no concerns about the reliability.

It is very stable. Once it is set up, it just runs.

The stability is pretty good. It is quite long-lasting, however, they've got a lot of releases and upgrades. You need to perform a lot of upgrades during the support peak, which is something new users should keep in mind.

Their stability depends on how agnostic they are. It depends on if I'm using super micro hardware or it depends on if I'm using HPE. So, it's stable. I don't think we are having any issues. It is mostly a stable product. The main issue with stability would be related to the hardware, not to the actual solution.

No stability issues.

It's probably the most stable, hyper-conversion environment I've seen on the market. I base that on the storage portion of the hyper-conversion environment.

No issues encountered.

We've found the stability to be excellent. There aren't any issues around its reliability. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's not buggy at all.

Excellent. The best I've seen.

It is very stable and scalable also. So even if we are facing the power problems, the machine restarts immediately after the power is resumed, and the machine is a rugged one. So definitely a stable machine.

We are three years into running Nutanix with zero downtime issues. We have replaced one disk.

Something to consider when designing Rackspace for Nutanix blocks, and other SuperMicro server hardware, is that you are effectively adding four computer nodes into a 2U space. When you stack multiple blocks together in a rack, the density of heat is considerable when compared to typical server hardware in the very same amount of space. If you do the design without appropriate cooling, yes, you will have issues with stability.

Nutanix Acropolis AOS has very good stability.

Nutanix AOS is a very stable system. You can lose drives or nodes, depending on your replication factor, and you will not lose your data. 

We have not encountered any issues with stability.

I have not encountered any stability issues at all.

The performance, the stability, are good. My only concern is about the licensing process and the difficulties involved with licensing. It's much too complicated. That said, overall, we have not worried about bugs, glitches, or freezing.

In terms of stability and performance, Acropolis is excellent. We've never gotten any negative feedback from our users. 

The stability is very good.

I find this solution stable.

This is a very stable solution. 

This solution is very stable. 

The solution is very stable at the moment.

Stability depends on the type of application you are running. If you are running complex applications you should run them one at a time.

Its stability and performance depend on what kind of hardware you put in the nodes. Its performance is average. It doesn't have high performance on the storage side, but it is good enough for mainstream users.

It is stable.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

From a software perspective, it's incredibly stable and portable. The only caution I would give is that since it is a software-defined solution, be careful of the underlying hardware. It's nothing to do with Nutanix, it's a hardware issue. You may have a highly available, reliable software platform, but it's on commodity hardware so you might experience more failures on the hardware because you decided to go for commodity. You need to be careful how you're architecting your solution and your application factors as you build up your data center, and not sell yourself short and get the cheapest hardware on the market to save costs, because that can turn out to be an expensive decision. 

No issues encountered.

The solution is very stable.

I like the level of stability we get. It's a good product in that sense. 

Acropolis AOS is stable.

The stability of this solution is good.

The solution is stable. On the customer's side, it was perfect, it was running very smooth without any issues.

The stability of the solution is very good. We haven't run into bugs or glitches. There haven't been crashes. So far, in the little experience we've had, I'd say the solution is quite dependable.

The stability is very good. It was actually the hardware that had some issues and that does not have to do with Nutanix. The hardware manufacturer is behind that. I don't remember having any issues with the stability of the software.

My impression of the stability is good. At the moment, we haven't had any issues.

So far I have not faced any major issues with stability of the Nutanix platform.

I have found Nutanix Acropolis AOS to be very reliable and stable.

The solution is stable. 

Stability is unquestionable, it's seamless. It's 100% uptime.

No issues at all with stability.

I have not encountered any stability issues.

The good thing about Nutanix is that there is zero-downtime for expansion, and the process is just too simple to be believe.

Nutanix Acropolis AOS is a stable solution.

We found the stability to be quite good. Any performance issues were tied to our network and bandwidth, however, we resolved all of that. It was never an issue with the product itself.

Yes, there was a bug with the new Intel chipset, but working with support, they quickly were able to issue an updated BIOS. Even with this issue, we had no downtime

Not yet.

We encountered stability issues during NOS 3.0, but it was not a big issue as we get support from Nutanix.

The hypervisor is very stable. Overall, the performance is good. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable and it doesn't have bugs or glitches.

Nutanix Acropolis AOS has been stable.

I did not encounter any issues with stability.

The stability of the product is excellent. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

I can't speak to the stability of the solution. I'd have to discuss this aspect with my team. We do provide support and may have some recommendations in relation to that, however, at this moment, I can't really comment.

In terms of stability, Nutanix is a good product.

The stability is good. It's time efficient compared to Dell and HP servers. Compared to those companies the stability is very good. 

Once you start the server, use the boot manual for very user-friendly options.

I have not yet encountered any issues with stability.

We did not encounter any stability issues.

Nutanix Acropolis AOS is stable.

Even when we do initial deployments, before we run the update for the newest versions, even the older version is quite stable for us. When we move to a new version, of course, it becomes even better.

The stability has been very good so far. If there are any errors, we always get alerts. We haven't had a problem with any bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

Nutanix Acropolis is super stable.

We currently have about 900 clusters/users using this program, with only four admins running this environment on a part-time basis. I would say that each Nutanix cluster does not require more than three to four hours of maintenance per month. We plan to increase our usage.

No.

We did not encounter any issues with stability.

So far, the operation has gone smoothly without any big issues, although there was a small bug when we tried the one-click update to upgrade all nodes’ firmware. Some nodes did not finish the update. We are resolving it with Nutanix support, so it's fine. It did not impact system uptime.

I think this solution is stable.

I haven't seen any stability issues.

The stability of Nutanix Acropolis AOS is very good. In the five years that I have been working with this solution, I have not had any issues with stability.

I have found the solution reliable.

Compatibility issue with Nutanix and Zerto.

We did not encounter any issues with stability.

There have been no stability issues so far.

I have not encountered any stability issues.

One time, with IPMI not reachable for CVM. I troubleshot this problem with Nutanix US support.

• Very good compression
• QoS is very good

The stability of Nutanix Acropolis AOS is very high. We have only had one or two problems in our cluster over the past two years. The problems that we did have were solved very quickly by Nutanix and by our technical service engineers together. I would say that it's robust and problem-free.

No issues encountered.

The solution provides good stability.

AOS is pretty stable and I know that they are continuing to invest, so it is improving.

It's a stable product.

It's the most stable infrastructure we had ever proposed.

Customers love the Nutanix experience and keep on adding more nodes to cover more business needs.

The solution is stable. There aren't bugs or glitches and it doesn't freeze or crash on us. It's reliable.

We have not encountered any stability issues.

I cannot say much, because it's fairly new. But, so far I would say it's good.

This is a stable solution that stands out amongst the competition.

The stability is good. This is the number-one product in that regard.

Acropolis AOS is highly stable.

Acropolis is stable.

The solution is very stable. It's reliable. It doesn't freeze or crash. There aren't a lot of bugs or glitches that affect the functionality.

None.

It has been stable so far.

Acropolis is pretty stable - it works perfectly within the production environment.

The solution is about 70% stable. I haven't had any major problems with it.

This solution's stability is fine.

The stability is really outstanding.

One of my biggest customers worldwide is called Agility and they have distributed data centers around the world. In my first meeting, I asked the IT Manager there, "Okay, so what do you think about Nutanix's stability?" He said, "You know what? My only problem with Nutanix is that it's very stable, so I don't know how my engineers, if one day they face a problem, will fix it, because it's very stable, unlike other vendors." 

We literally put the appliance in production, and we forget about it. It's a very stable environment. More than 70 percent of my sales are coming from existing customers. Customers start with a small workload and then they add more workloads because they find the platform very stable and they can depend on it. They can add more workloads to it. And they even refer the technology to other customers as well.

Very few, it has now been running for five to six months without any problems.

No issues encountered.

I’ve implemented and operated Nutanix in several different situations. Never had an issue in all those cases.

The stability of Nutanix Acropolis AOS is good. It has high availability.

It is very stable. We have only had really small issues, and some of it was resolved with my Nutanix support.

Nutanix will be there for the long run because if you look at it, Nutanix is not into the hardware business. Nutanix is mainly into the software business. For any business which is running on a hardware business, stability is a little difficult because hardware keeps on changing but since Nutanix is only into the software, and they only sell the hardware, I guess it is on Super Micro. They have greater stability than anyone else because they are purely into the software medium.

Initially, we had some issues with the deployment and it was resolved in future updates by the great technical support from Nutanix.

No issues encountered.

Acropolis' stability is good.

It's very stable.

Sometimes, I had to install it twice to place the solution. Errors in the middle of installation require you retry, then it goes well. Other than that, it is very simple and does not requires deep knowledge.

There have been no stability issues.

Nutanix Acropolis AOS is stable.

This is a stable product.

For now, it is stable enough.

I find this solution to be stable.

Stability, in my opinion, is very good.

We have not had any stability issues.