The licensing is per user per month and includes full technical support. I give the pricing a six out of ten. It's not a bad product for a high price like Oracle is. It's a good product for a fair price but It's not cheap.

We are using the 30-day free trial.

The solution is expensive. I'd rate it one out of ten in terms of affordability. 

The pricing for Okta Workforce Identity could still be improved or made cheaper. It costs from 50 to 100 euros a year per user.

Okta Workforce Identity has different packages you can choose from, and my previous company had all of them, particularly the full Okta suite. We went with the full suite because you can also use it in the new employee onboarding process, so when you get a new employee, you can authorize Okta Workforce Identity to provision all the applications automatically so that when you create the new user and you put that user into a certain user group, then he gets all the applications provisioned automatically. For example, for Microsoft 365, the solution creates the user, puts that user in the right place, and also adds licensing, so my company was using Okta Workforce Identity as well for the onboarding of new employees.

Small and medium businesses cannot afford the tool. There are no additional costs associated with the tool. The vendor must reduce the price over time.

Price-wise, Okta Workforce Identity is a cheap solution. The overall cost depends on the license since you can negotiate with Okta or any of Okta's partners only if you opt for many licenses.

Okta has fairly competitive pricing.

Okta Workforce Identity scales up by the user, and then by the service that you're purchasing.

The solution is not the cheapest but not the most expensive. They are in the middle rating.

I rate the price of Okta Workforce Identity a three out of five.

Though I don't know about the licensing model of the product, I wouldn't be surprised if Okta offers a per user license subscription model.

The pricing is a bit expensive. I'd rate it four out of ten in terms of affordability. It's a bit more expensive than our older solution.  

Okta charges per user, and that can make it costly if you are a big company.

I think the approximate cost for the license is somewhere between $20,000-$21,000 a year and that includes everything. 

The product has a user-based license model.

The pricing seems very reasonable. None of the customers have complained about it.

The price of Okta Workforce Identity is competitively priced. We pay annually for the use of the solution.

This solution is costly.

With Microsoft, you get the exact same information that Okta gives out of the box: free, because that's what Microsoft does, and even if I compare to other cloud IDPs, with Okta, access may offer free access for startups, and if you have fewer users, it's okay. Pricing is decent. The moment you talk about the enterprise level, for example, we were talking about implementing Okta across the US with multiple customers, and the cost they gave us was two million dollars. The cost is not justified for the single assets of this solution, so Okta is bad in those terms.

The solution's pricing model could be better for SMBs.

I can't discuss pricing.

The solution’s pricing needs to be reasonable. You are dealing with a lot of components and the pricing is component-based.

The price of the solution is good.

This is an expensive solution but the security makes it worthwhile.

The price of this product could be lower. It's just like Box, where when it first came on the market the price was lower. Once people started using it, the price increased.

It's worth the investment. Make sure you fully utilize Okta, even if it takes professional services.

The solution is designed to be a software as a service, or SaaS. The pricing comes at a moderate cost. It's not the most expensive option on the market.

Their prices are publicly listed on the website. Any additional fees would definitely come into play if you need professional services from Okta themselves.

Setup is simple if you are an AD admin, cost comparison is nominal compared secured access

All the providers of EIM have the same licensing model. If you have 10 million users or customers of Okta, it is just one payment. However, it is costly in this case. The licensing model is unique to each user. Each user costs 10 euros. Therefore, if you have 10 million users, that's almost 100 million, so it is costly. The model is effective, however. Each user's identity is unique. It is cheaper for small companies and organizations, as they have fewer users. It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective.

I don't have any visibility on the pricing. It was negotiated by my company. I'm not sure how much they pay.

The price of Okta Workforce Identity is reasonable.

The pricing is reasonable.

Workforce Identity is well-priced.

It could be a bit too pricey for small companies. Okta Workforce Identity can add a lot of benefits, but smaller companies may not have a lot of applications that need to be managed by Okta Workforce Identity. In larger organizations, there are more departments, applications, and users to manage. Okta Workforce Identity adds a bit more value to those bigger organizations.

In addition to standard licensing fees, there are also additional costs for things like additional support and so on.

The product is expensive compared to other vendors.

We pay for the solution on a yearly basis. We recognize it as quite expensive.

We were using a standard license during the trial. We felt that we would get more features. However, there were some misunderstandings with our reseller and the reseller did not know this product very well. Therefore, it was hard at the beginning to get to know which features were covered under which license.

The pricing is a bit costly. It could be lower.

I believe it competes well. The pricing is pretty competitive. I know that Microsoft also provides something similar with its MFA and identity services. 

It has a yearly subscription. As compared to its competitors, it is quite expensive. It also has a complex licensing model.