OmniPeek Previous Solutions

Venkat Lkmula - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech spesialist at INT tech services

I have previously used Wireshark. One of the differences between OmniPeek and Wireshark is in the test bed OmniPeek allows you to choose a color coding for each and every component. You can set the color of many components, such as the client based on your interest, and MAC address. You are able to see certain packets from the APs easier. Wireshark is more user-friendly for automation and OmniPeek is good for manual testing.

Wireshark cannot be run continuously because the buffers will be used up after half an hour and the application crash. However, in OmniPeek this does not happen it continuously starts until the memory space is consumed. It will not crash. You can run it for twelve hours continuously and it will save without crashing.

View full review »
Pavani Inturi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at Global Edge Software Ltd

I have three years of prior experience using Wireshark. We have gotten higher performance with OmniPeek. 

View full review »
it_user840945 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior systems specialist at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

I use Wireshark, which is a free, open-source package. I am still using both of them because of how the two products represent information. OmniPeek is a superior product, but I correlate the information from Wireshark because sometimes it gives me a quicker indication of what I am looking at.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about LiveAction, Riverbed, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.