The way the solution is installed and deployed is very valuable. They make it very easy. The two-factor identification is very good. For the web portal, you need to implement a jump sever. It's not a native HTML protocol. This is probably… more»
What needs improvement?
I've only been using the solution for a limited time, so in terms of speaking to improvements, I'm not sure I can say. I need more time with the solution to use it in order to properly evaluate it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing is cheaper than CyberArk.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used CyberArk. It was a much more difficult solution to work with and deploy.
What other advice do I have?
We use the on-premises deployment model. It's easier to use than its competitors. I'd rate it eight out of ten.