OpenShift Pricing
JK
Jan Kappert
OpenShift consultant at HCS Company
The first thing we need to know is that Kubernetes is free. However, if we need to maintain a Kubernetes environment, we need 10 people to build, maintain and keep Kubernetes secure and bring it to the same level as OpenShift. Then we have to pay evenly as subscriptions for OpenShift. It's important to start small because the solution is scalable. We can build our cluster and look at the bundle option, not the external subscriptions. Talking to the people at Red Hat can save us money.
View full review »MB
Matthias Bertschy
Senior Kubernetes Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
I think it is a good idea to start looking at alternatives to Red Hat, perhaps a more open-source solution. This way we can save on licensing costs and have more control over our infrastructure. We get to the point where we can afford to pay skilled people to look at our code instead of paying for a license. OpenShift is really good when we need to start, but once we get to a certain scale, it becomes too expensive. It is more cost-effective to go with a cloud-managed Kubernetes if the organization is already on the cloud.
View full review »SP
Srinadh Puli
VP at United Overseas Bank Limited (UOB)
The licensing cost for OpenShift is expensive when compared to other products. RedHat also charges you additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenShift
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenShift. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We are currently using the open version, OKD. We plan to get the enterprise version in the future.
I don’t have any information about the licensing costs or the process.
View full review »The pricing is standard; the solution isn't particularly expensive or affordable.
View full review »ES
EisaShaheen
DevOps Engineer at Nudtteo
The cost is quite high. I would rate it eight out of ten.
View full review »It's expensive. It may be cheaper to invest in building Vanilla Kubernetes, especially if security is not the number one motivation or requirement. Of course, that's difficult, and in some business areas, such as banking, that's not something you can put as a second priority. In other situations, a Vanilla Kubernetes with a sufficiently strong team can be cheaper and almost as effective. In addition, people who are already working with a specific cloud provider tend to find cheaper solutions by combining Kubernetes on the specific cloud and choosing that over OpenShift.
View full review »Pricing of OpenShift depends on the number of nodes and who is hosting it. OpenShift is more expensive than other solutions, however, I think it is worth it.
View full review »JA
Javeed Abdul
Senior System Engineer at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees
My company makes payments towards the licensing costs attached to OpenShift.
The price depends on the type and the nature of the organizations, along with the types of projects that are of considerable range. I don't think the price is very much of an issue for any organization against the services being delivered over the cloud and the services of OpenSuite.
The product's support is expensive. I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten.
View full review »AK
reviewer1768764
Executive Head of Department - M-PESA Tech at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
We had a Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) license for all our servers' operating systems. By having multiple Red Hat products together, you can negotiate costs and leverage on having a sort of enterprise license agreement to reduce the overall outlay or TCO.
The pricing and licensing for OpenShift is okay.
View full review »CB
reviewer2062821
Senior Manager - Cloud at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees
Vendor support is one reason to go with OpenShift. It's an open-source product, but you can pay for support.
KA
reviewer1929324
Head of Architecture at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Depending on the extent of the product use, licenses are available for a range of time periods, and are renewable at the end of the period.
View full review »AD
Anubhav Dhingra
Solution Architect at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
The product’s pricing is expensive. It has the biggest market share right now as a containerization platform. It is the highest-selling product.
View full review »AC
reviewer2021037
IT Specialist at a government with 10,001+ employees
This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market.
I don't directly deal with pricing or handle the negotiation on licensing. I can't speak to the exact price.
View full review »We get a bundled cost with one of our product suites, but I am unsure of the exact costs.
View full review »PR
Pawan Ramekar
Software engineer at ACI Worldwide
We use the license-free version of Red Hat Openshift but we pay for the support. The support fee is expensive.
View full review »I would try the online public OpenShift instance first and see if it is something that would provide benefit to each enterprise architecture and then go on from there.
View full review »SK
reviewer2021424
Tech Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The model of pricing and buying licenses is quite rigid. We are in the process of negotiating on-demand pricing which will help us take advantage of the cloud as a whole.
The solution is expensive but cost-effective.
View full review »GR
reviewer2336730
QA Lead at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The product has reasonable pricing. It is an affordable solution but needs a learning effort to understand industrial-grade security.
View full review »DM
reviewer1563195
Cloud Native Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I don't deal with the cost part, but I know that the cost is very high when compared to other products. They charge for CPU and memory, but we don't worry about it. If people really want to make use of this platform, they don't care about the licensing and costs.
View full review »I suggest they take licenses for physical nodes with two sockets and as many cores and as much RAM as possible.
Then use a virtualization solution to create as many Kubernetes virtual nodes, knowing that it doesn't make sense to allocate too much RAM to each node since one should not run more than approximately 80 pods per node.
RHEL licenses are included.
View full review »OpenShift is available in Red Hat's usual open source support subscriptions.
View full review »I think OpenShift PREMIERE costs a lot more, compared to the support given in Europe. If you buy directly from the service on the cloud, the level of support is not the same.
View full review »Go for it. Red Hat is professional on solutions.
View full review »Save money and get OpenShift. Literally.
View full review »For trials and prototypes, the open source version of OpenShift will suffice for most users and is compatible with the licensed version of OpenShift.
View full review »Pricing is good in comparison with AWS. The enterprise pricing is also competitive and is specifically fine-tuned to the type of environments we have.
View full review »HH
reviewer1383027
Infrastructure Architect at a government with 501-1,000 employees
The licensing costs are quite cheap compared to other similar solutions.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenShift
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenShift. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.