People in my company used different solutions to cover different divisions. For example, some people used NetworkDrive, and others used SharePoint. After I joined, I decided to consolidate enterprise-wide applications and I also educated people about the product.

I would recommend OpenText because it has more features than Microsoft's native content management solution.

We were using FileNet, but I was not personally there at the time. I came to the company later. I do not know all the details about it, but they switched because FileNet just was not meeting business needs. 

We previously used a tool from Siemens.

We were using another tool, but there were not many options to integrate. There was no out-of-the-box solution. We had to do customization to do the integrations. It was a fairly old tool, whereas OpenText is more modern.

I have used SharePoint and IBM solutions in my previous organizations.

Our only document management solution has been the Content Server.

We were working with a smaller company called Syntax. We were using their document management and workflow management solutions. They were good, but we needed something that would scale up better and also had better documentation retention capabilities than what that had.

We were not using any other solution previously. We were using network shares.

When I was an architect, on one of our organizations we used IBM Finance in one part of our business. We decided that it was a good solution.

For OpenText, it was a decision which related to using a business process managed system as well.

No (we were using file servers).

We have been using OpenText from the beginning.