The product's scalability is good. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

There are three users of OpenVPN Access Server in my company.

The product is not extensively used, and we do not have plans to increase the number of users in the company.

We have been able to have all our clients on the server so far. I haven't had a problem so far with adding more users. We have about 50 users.

We have 100 OpenVPN Access Server users in our organization. It is a scalable product.

I am using the solution only for myself.

The solution is scalable.

I don't have information about the scalability. I haven't tried to scale it. 

We have 30 to 40 customers using the solution. 

It is very scalable. We have 50 people on the solution. 

We do not have plans to increase usage at this time. 

OpenVPN is generally scalable, but in certain regions like China, where deep packet inspection is widespread, there are certain challenges. The scalability holds up well, but consideration is needed for environments with stringent stateful inspection, especially in cases like China. Overall, I would rate the scalability of the solution as an eight out of ten.

OpenVPN Access Server was scalable for ten users in my team. I don't know how it will be beyond that. 

I'm not sure of the scalability. I've never tried to scale the product. 

We have three customers on the solution right now. 

Scalability, as far as I can tell thus far, is limited to the hardware capabilities of your Linux router or host from which you intend to run OpenVPN.

I give the scalability a six out of ten.

My impression is that this is a scalable solution.

We have maybe 50 to 100 users on the solution. It's a small server. It might be able to scale a bit more, however, we haven't really tried to do that.

The tool is scalable. 

We have 100 OpenVPN Access Server users using in our company. It is a scalable product.

It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability as an eight.

The scalability for the four locations is good.

I give the scalability a six out of ten. The scalability of the solution relies on the operating system being used by the clients. It is easier to scale for clients who are using Windows, while it can be a bit more challenging for clients using Linux.

The product can scale well. 

We have 40 or 50 people using the product at this time. 

As remote work increases, we likely will expand usage. 

We had some scalability issues at first but it was our own lack of understanding. We had created just the limited set of clients, before we expanded on that to maximize it to 1000-plus clients on one subnet. That was all our own research and fixing that.

Not yet. 

I have found that OpenVPN Access Server is scalable.

Horizontally, this solution is definitely not scalable. Vertically, it is possible but there will be some downtime. Scaling requires that we stop the server, upscale it, select a different instance, and then restart it. The downtime is approximately five minutes.

Never.

It's a scalable product. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so. 

We have around 2,000 users on the solution right now. 

We're always open to increasing usage. 

The tool is not scalable. We have two users for the product. 

Open VPN Access Server is scalable.

I have found OpenVPN Access Server to be scalable.

We have approximately 10 users using this solution.

We more than doubled our staff at my previous company and our OpenVPN appliance handled it well.

Our use case was less complex than most. We did not come across any issues with scalability.

No issues with scalability.

No issues.

The solution is scalable. 

It is not scalable. We have 20 people who use this solution. Most of them are developers, one is a system admin person, and one is a DevOps person.

We have not scaled service yet.

No issues with scalability.

No issues with scalability.