There is a connection between performance and stability, especially when handling large data volumes in Oracle Audit Vault. Stability issues may arise during heavy data collection. I would rate the stability of the solution as a six out of ten.

It has little impact on the software. The visibility is good because it doesn't impact performance. I will rate the stability a nine out of ten.

So far regarding to my experience with it it's stable but the problem when with the support when are facing a  bug or something you have to keep following all the time. 

We have some challenges with stability, but it's okay considering the entire industry.

I have installed it in two banking companies. It is mostly stable. Sometimes, there is an issue with the system. Its stability is okay.

This product is not stable for large environments with more than 50 targets. Also, it is not recommended for the Audit Vault data warehouse database to be a RAC. It seems that the product is not tested with more than 50 targets, so be ready for performance and usability surprises. To overcome these limitations, we worked with a core designer Audit Vault team and suggested product improvements for future releases. I hope they have incorporated these suggestions in the 12.1/12.2 versions.

The solution itself is stable, but if there is a skills gap within the department and none of the IT guys understand that in Oracle Audit Vault and Database Firewall solution things can go wrong. If customers don't train the in-house employees properly as to how the solution is deployed limited skills can result in stability issues.

After the deployment, I recommend designating two or three people to get training. I do provide a bit of information into a general report to help clients but it may not always be enough. There is also the possibility of falling back into bad habits after a while when making changes in the system.

I did not encounter any such issues. The product was both stable and scalable.

I did find the product to be stable in the testing environment.

In the previous version, when the aud$ and fga_log$ tables reached a certain size, the collectors sometimes shut down and it took too long to get reports from the AV console. So it was not working in a stable manner. I can say that the new versions are stable.

This product is quite stable and robust. We have not faced any issues with respect to stability in the past few years.

It's not a stable product, especially around log management and log generation. There are lots of logs and the administration or management is not as easy as one would expect. So you need a lot of DBA and unique skills in order to handle the virtual appliances. For us it was in our domain, but I don't think for any other organization it would be easy to readminister, especially when cable spaces are full and there are other challenges.

Some of the earlier versions have not matured enough.

I actually encountered stability issues in DPE mode, but it was with the first release.

The product is stable but extremely sensitive.

There are not many issues with stability on the latest version of the product.

We constantly have stability issues. The product puts an agent on each managed server to process audit information. The agents were constantly going down without warning and missed auditing data.

The solution is very stable and reliable.

We haven’t had any stability issues as yet, as you can even configure for HA (High Availability) as well.

We did encounter some stability issues. There are lots of bugs in the starting version but most of them are patched; the latest versions are much stable.

If you use the DB AUD$ option, you have to be careful because this table might fill up your database without any notifications.

I had problems with the old versions this product. Today, it's more stable.

It's very stable and runs smoothly. Our servers have never been restarted since the first installation.

I have not encountered any stability issues.