Oracle BPM Competitors and Alternatives

Get our free report covering camunda, IBM, Software AG, and other competitors of Oracle BPM. Updated: December 2020.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of Oracle BPM competitors and alternatives

reviewer1396116
Digital Engineering Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Aug 7, 2020
This flexible, open-source, Java-based solution allows us to integrate microservices quickly

What is our primary use case?

We use an open-source version of this product. In some cases we install on-premises, in some cases, we install on Dockers. How we install the product depends on the use cases and the needs of the projects that we engage in. One client may be in logistics. Another client may be involved with internal communication. Another one is in retail. Some will be in business project management. We have to treat each of these to fit their unique needs.

Pros and Cons

  • "Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
  • "The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."

What other advice do I have?

My advice about Camunda is I recommend this product when it fits your needs. It is that simple. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product as a nine because it fits my demands. Of course, there is always room for improvement in the interface, or performance, and stuff like that. I hope that people will work on Camunda and within the next releases we will have more connectors, we will have a much more powerful interface, and maybe we can have a mobile app as well.
Suresh Thota
Enterprise Architect/Enterprise Digital Solution Architecture at Mashreq
Real User
Top 20
Oct 21, 2020
Offers the ability to create a case file identification

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is completely banking driven. We select the account to open, determine the complimenting and storage core, cooperate on their calls, do analysis for the core customer, uphold compliance policy and anti money laundering payments, and all the functions we define in the process. Currently, we are using it on-premises with a roadmap for into the cloud. We call that the private cloud, because this is a bank space so we are not going to the public cloud due to regulations and compliance policy.

Pros and Cons

  • "It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries."
  • "The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."

What other advice do I have?

IBM Business Automation Workflow is a good tool provided you can use it cross-platform where there are a lot of features. Another good thing, which other products, like Pega and Oracle don't have, is that it is a very optimizing solution providing the IBM BPM process orchestration. On a scale of one to ten, I would give IBM Business Automation Workflow a nine. Since I have been working with multiple vendors on multiple projects in the billion dollar project range, I see that it works for end-to-end functionality. It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any…
SaiedKhani
ERP Functional Specialist at Aryasasol
Real User
Top 20
Oct 17, 2019
Helps us to create the process, pages, and forms and is easy to use

What is our primary use case?

I use this as part of my solution for BPM (Business Process Management) development.

Pros and Cons

  • "This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."
  • "It is missing some important features that other products have."

What other advice do I have?

On a scale from one to ten where ten is the best, based on my experience, I would give it an eight. It is not a ten because it needs to improve in feature availability.
reviewer1115901
Technical Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Nov 26, 2020
Highly stable in production and easy to use for testing and deployment

What is our primary use case?

It is used for on-premises and cloud integrations. It has a number of products for on-premises integration.

Pros and Cons

  • "It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."
  • "ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution. It is a highly stable, robust, scalable solution. I would rate TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM an eight out of ten.
Pedro GentilSoares
Consultor Sênior em Gestão de Processos, Negócios e Serviços at Trust Business Consulting
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Dec 15, 2020
Improves governance-related processes and provides full support for BPMN 2.0

What is our primary use case?

Some of our main use cases are in project risk planning and tender cost management.

Pros and Cons

  • "I like that Bizagi is fully compatible with BPMN 2.0. It also eases the way in which we work with BPMN 2.0 itself, which is a comprehensive and rather complex notation standard."
  • "I would like to see a facility for building a simple CRUD application. In Bizagi, you can use database modeling, diagrams, forms, etc., but in some circumstances I need CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) functionalities which are not there yet."

What other advice do I have?

I am very enthusiastic about Bizagi because it lets you see anything you need to see very quickly. I would rate Bizagi an eight out of ten.
Get our free report covering camunda, IBM, Software AG, and other competitors of Oracle BPM. Updated: December 2020.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.