Oracle BPM Previous Solutions

Amir-Khanof
Technical manager at royal visio
This solution is not used in our production area because of our licensing, and also because of a change in policy whereby Oracle is pushing its customers to the cloud. We are not interested in moving to the cloud and are now instead considering Camunda BPM. My understanding with Camunda is that the engine is very small, and is not resource-intensive. It requires less in terms of administration. It seems to me that if I have a lot of users then it will be more stable than Oracle. Also, the maintenance will be easier because the application is smaller. The license will be cheaper for Camunda because, with Oracle, you need to have the database, Weblogic server, the BPM server, and lots of other products. Finally, I have looked at Camunda‚Äôs performance on Youtube and other sites, and it seems to be better than that of Oracle. View full review »
Alejandro-Perez
IT Integration Architect at OUTSTREAM SPRL
We did not previously use a different solution. After Oracle BPM I used Camunda. Camunda has a different approach. Oracle is heavier in the sense of requirements but it's better for a complex organization in terms of integration to the environment. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, camunda, IBM and others in Business Process Management. Updated: June 2020.
426,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.