We stopped the update phase for adding more resources based on a management decision.

We have had no issues scaling it as needed.

We have had no issues scaling it.

Scalability is quite easy. We are running two of them across two data centers, so it's quite easy to scale up and set it up. I'd rate scalability ten out of ten.

We have had no issues scaling it.

I did not encounter any scalability issues.

Just cost. To expand the hardware's capability requires a massive investment.

It provides a standard procedure to scale the number of compute/storage nodes.

It's been able to scale for our needs.

Scalability, you can take it up to a full cabinet and that's not been an issue at all. It's a lot of horsepower in a single cabinet.

There were no scalability issues to date.

No scalability issues.

In the context of ACI, it is scalable. You can add anything from a quarter rack or half rack to a full rack, etc. It is scalable in terms of computing and in terms of storage as well. However, if you think about ACI, Hyper-converged network and some of the solutions like VxFlex and software-defined storage and VMware, it's not that flexible. The level of scalability depends on the conversion with other products.

Scaling up the server required long machine stops of 24 to 48 hours. The interventions did not always end successfully. Sometimes they failed and needed to be rescheduled.

Yes. It scales well.