After comparing Oracle Identity Governance with its competitors, such as SailPoint and IBM Tivoli Identity Manager, I have found that the core functionality of these solutions is essentially the same. While the platforms may differ slightly, they offer almost similar features. So, in summary, these solutions are all quite similar.

I evaluated SailPoint and One Identity, apart from Oracle Identity Governance.

Ford Truck is very quick and easy to implement in a customer environment. It is user-friendly, stable, offers a lot of customization, and doesn't take more than ten or fifteen minutes to implement. 

Migration to AD(FS) will be considered to decrease the operational cost.  Oracle Unified Directory will remain for Oracle Database running on Linux.

I evaluated SailPoint.

We evaluated products such as at Microsoft, Okta, CA, and IBM. The Oracle platform was more aligned with our business road maps and meets the desired capabilities the business needs.

Yes, CA and IBM products.

I just joined, so there's no initiative to reevaluate that part.

Several years ago, I actually coordinated a proof of concept. We looked at several different vendors. We eventually landed with two vendors. We actually had kind of a bake off. Both of the vendors came in. We put them through a series of tests, we had usability tests, scripted tests. We had them demonstrate a lot of their functionality, and then we evaluated them. The OIM product came out on top.

We decided to go with Oracle because, when we did those different types of tests, they scored better than the other provider in all aspects.

When I’m selecting a vendor such as Oracle, it's important for us to make sure that they deliver on time, that they have a solid road map, and that they have the resources to back what they commit to.

Yes, we evaluated both Sun Identity Manager, and CA Identity Manger.

We did not consider other solutions as we needed a certified and supported configuration to perform an integration with Oracle E-Business R12. Also, the potential integration with other identity management systems was a factor.

We didn't look at other options because the Oracle product, at the time, was the only product that can fully integrate with Oracle E-Business Suite and manage those identities.

We have evaluated a few other market leaders in the area as part of our solution upgrade. When we did an apples-to-apples comparison, with our IT foot print, moving with OIM into the next version as well was the right decision.

If I had to pick an identity management team, I would definitely pick Oracle. It's my favorite. From an implementation point of view, being a developer, I still prefer Oracle over anything else. But if I look at the market and see where things are going, I would go with SalePoint at the moment. SalePoint, or if you have any SAP solutions, I would go with Okta.

There were no other options looked at.

Not really. I did not evaluate other options.

No, we are a big Oracle shop.

Yes we also looked at solutions from CA and IBM.

We are currently involved in the process of evaluating other vendors.

I evaluated CA and RSA before making my decision.

I did not evaluate other options. The customer chose this product.

I have evaluated many IAM options, including cloud and open source products on the market. OIM fulfills the requirements for my organization.

No.

We had a few options like BMC, Novell, and Tivoli IDM's
.

Before choosing this product, I did not evaluate other options.