Scalability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Oracle Identity Governance is a scalable solution, without a doubt. Oracle Identity Governance is a solution primarily designed for medium to large-sized companies and unsuitable for small companies. The solution is suitable or reasonable for a company with an employee size of more than 250.

Scalability depends on the administrator. At the time, it was around 40,000 to 50,000.

Oracle Identity Governance has good scalability.

The product is scalable. 

Oracle Identity Governance is scalable.

We have approximately 8,000 users using this solution on a daily basis.

The solution is scalable. We have around four to five customers for the product.

Oracle Identity Governance is a scalable product.

The solution is scalable, we have over 500 users. 

We did not encounter issues with scalability since we architected the solution to scale out enough to handle data.

We do not have plans to increase usage. Usage is static. If the number of users increases, if more are hired, we may increase. It is just based on the organization. There is no plan to change to another solution. If the the number of users increases, we'll still have the same application, as it is licensed and not a monthly subscription. It is a perpetual license. There will not be any changes.

Excellent!

For what we've done, it's scaled. It's difficult to say what scale we're measuring against because we're not the size of a Google, but we do have several hundred thousand identities in our system. For our purposes, it's scalable.

The solution is scalable - we have over 25,000 users.

Oracle Identity Governance is a scalable solution. At present, we have around 10,000 users.

There is no doubt that this product scales well. It is a well-established product for enterprise users. One of our customers has an employee base of almost 30,000 people.

Given that it's an OEM product, the scalability is not really a critical factor for us. People can wait for minutes, hours, even days to get access granted. For OIM, it's not really a high criteria.

Scalability is one of the problems that we've had. Now that we've had it in production, and we have X number of concurrent users, we're having some performance issues. That's what they've helped us with, as far as they’ve given us some patches to correct the issues; it's become a little more acceptable. We're not at end state yet, so that's another thing we're going to continue to work with them on.

No this has not been much of an issue for us. The product scales quite well with the size of our user base.

We've had no issues scaling it for our needs.

Identity Governance can scale up. 

It scales well, because you can add more nodes. You can scale it vertically as well as horizontally.

The solution is scalable. We currently have around 200 or so users.

It's scaled just fine for our needs.

There are issues with the scalability in the long run.

We have had no issues scaling it for our needs.

At the moment, we have not had any issues with the product’s scalability.

There are some scalability issues with every product; most of them are related to load and performance but these can be handled and they are improving day by day.

We've had very few issues with scalability, I would say. But since we have the expertise and Oracle’s support to tackle from the product perspective, things are taken care of in such cases.

It's a scalable solution and it can easily be scaled.

The size of our customers' companies varies. 

I have done implementations up to 150k. We were provisioning 20 connectors. To be very frank, the experience I had was provisioning and reconciliation was on the scheduler.

Nowadays, if you compare scalability with cloud-based solutions, where you can implement Oracle in a SAP solution, you can extend the scalability. It is auto scalable. But if you need to extend to one or more server, it's not possible. It's not easy in any client-based environment. Scalability is something which is not possible in Oracle or as simple as any SAP solution at the moment.

So there are pros and cons of cloud-based solutions. For cloud-based solutions, you can extend to where there is no issue on the performance. But the limitation is you can't customize everything based on the client's requirements. With Oracle, that was the advantage, but the scalability was still a concern. Until last year it was a concern.

Scalability is costly as the system resources are consumed very quickly.

It is pretty good on scalability as well.

Scalability has never been an issue.

We don't have large volumes of data. From a scaling point of view, we didn’t face any issues.

As I’ve mentioned, we are still testing the waters. We haven't gone into experimenting how good the scalability is.

The scalability depends on what you need to manage, the security needs, and the quantity of people.

Yes we did have issues with scalability.

It seems scalable. My client has 30,000 applications and I think a lot of them are already using this tool. I remember putting in an application where 20,000 entities needed to be onboarded and it managed itself.

It is scalable as we expand into other applications. You need to fine-tune in some areas when expanding and maintaining the application.

There were no issues with scalability.

Scalability is reduced if the load increases above approximately 100,000.

Yes sometimes.

OIM is the right product and it is a good fit for enterprise deployments. There are no issues related to scalability, as long as it was configured as per Oracle enterprise deployment guidelines.

It's scaled for our needs.

It's been able to scale for our needs.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

In customer identity management, the product suffers performance issues when scaled up to large numbers of users.

It’s a very scalable application.

No issues.

No issues encountered.

I have not encountered any scalability issues.

The scalability depends on the load of the system. Our system is a bit heavy and requires good hardware.

We have not had the need to scale the product.