SalesPoint, Saviynt, Microsoft Enterprise, NetIQ, Tivoli, or Oracle Identity Manager - they all do the same things functionally. 

However, the ease of use, configuration, and licensing costs differ.

I used to implement SailPoint before Oracle Identity Governance, and SailPoint had better documentation than Oracle Identity Governance. I found the documentation for Oracle Identity Governance lacking.

We used Microsoft ILM and FIM to manage our identity management provisioning and used Symphony for our Access Management side. We made the switch because Oracle offered a more robust solution for us to become a shared service for Identity Management.

The client was using a Sun Microsystems solutions, so Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems and the client re-evaluated what solution they should use going forward, and they made the switch to Oracle.

I have experience with several similar solutions, including Centrify.

We are currently exploring SailPoint and Saviynt and although no decision has been made as of yet, we might move to another platform.

In the past, I also worked with SiteMinder, but it did not have this level of depth.

We did not really have a previous solution. OIM has been here for years. Many, many years ago, we had a homegrown solution, but it’s no longer there. For the several past years, I know it's just been OIM.

We did use a different product before going to Oracle and we made the switch due to lack of support for the other product.

I owned a company that implemented these solutions for various clients. Each client has a different identity manager, so we worked with three identity solutions: Oracle, NetIQ, and Computer Association.

This is the first implementation of a Single Sign-On solution.

I have only worked on Oracle. For the last year I have not been getting any clients who are ready to implement Oracle. So, that's the challenge for me. That's why I moved from Oracle to other solutions.

I had not used a similar product to this previously.

We were using something, which was acquired by Oracle and then we migrated to Oracle. We also have a lot of data to process, and Oracle performs well for that.

I have worked with Microsoft FIM and SailPoint IQ as well. This was not by choice but the client environment was a multiple identity management platform. Silo based deployment had resulted in a solution that meant that there were multiple identity management solutions supporting the company’s global needs.

Yes, a customer used a different solution. We switched because the new solution can cover/manage most of the in-house systems/suites of apps.

No, I did not.

We used an ETL-engine to push users earlier. It didn't have any "IDM functionality" so we switched to what we though was the best solution available.

No comment. I personally was not involved during the initial phase.

No previous solution used.

We started with OIG.

I did not previously use a different solution.

No previous solution used.

I did not previously use a different solution.