Oracle Identity Governance is an expensive solution. On a scale of one to ten, where one signifies a high price and ten signifies a low price, I would give this solution a rating of one.

The licensing is expensive.

The licensing cost for Oracle Identity Governance is very high, so I'd rate it two out of five.

We have purchased a perpetual license with Oracle and only pay yearly maintenance fees, support and updates. 

The solution is very expensive for the benefits received from the product, however, the pricing we received from other vendors does not make it worthwhile to switch to another solution.

I would rate it a two out of five for pricing.

I do not know specific pricing but the product is expensive when compared to other OIM products. 

The price of the implementation of Oracle Identity Governance is more of a concern than the cost of the solution. The effort that you have to do to put the solution in place is higher than the license cost.

I can't say much about the pricing for Oracle Identity Governance because it's different from one geography to another. In India, the license price costs less than in other geographies.

We moved to this solution because of its cost. 

Oracle Identity Governance is expensive.

Not including licence, we had a generous project budget to set-up and replace our legacy platform. The day-to-day cost is based on 3 people we have to support it. Of course our team & infrastructure is growing so the cost will rise by nature of supporting the service.

We have a perpetual license. 

Get the right product which you can customize as per your business needs. IAM is a journey and you cannot switch products after 2-3 years; hence consider strong roadmap of the product.

The hardware and the operating system obviously cost money. With Oracle, you have the product itself and the management product which might be expensive sometimes as well.

As a customer, it's not okay that the salespeople sell you a product that they don't tell you all the ins and outs about and you are expected to manage it. You discover all of these things afterward if you don't ask the right questions.

The price is based on the number of users per year.

The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive. We have an annual maintenance contract.

It has many built-in components, and some components, if you don't actually use them, you don't need to purchase them.

After purchasing the solution we only needed to pay for the implementation phase to build the connectors etc. and the annual standard licensing fee for support.

It could certainly be less expensive. There are a lot of components. Normal licensing is a real nightmare. Oracle should make things easier for the customer to understand.

If I rate the cost, Oracle is the costliest at the moment. And there is no competition around Oracle and other tools. Oracle is somewhere in millions while a product like SalePoint is much less. So, I am not sure how to rate it. From a service provider perspective, or custom integration perspective, clients are proposing Oracle. So, if I propose Oracle, the only friction I get is the cost. It's too much for the client. Any small client will not be happy to use Oracle at the moment.

Oracle is still very expensive, and is not generally used by SMEs.

6 months of implementation and it took almost $500k.

I would recommend purchasing the licenses before the end of Oracles fiscal year. You tend to get the best discounts then.

Oracle licenses are expensive. I suggest making pricing and licensing decisions that align with architectural requirements and the project's budget.

If you're anticipating a lot of growth, you may be able to keep costs more predictable with CPU-based licensing.

It is very expensive.