The stability of the solution has improved over time. I rate it an eight out of ten. 

The stability needs some improvement. It's less stable than I would like. Sometimes it gets hung up. For example, if I import some files from my students, the files cannot get removed. Instead, it crashes. 

The stability of the product is quite good. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

The solution is very stable when you start the machine. We don't experience bugs or glitches. It works quite well.

It's a stable solution, and I would rate stability at ten out of ten.

It is a stable product.

We've found the stability to be good.

For my users, it is very stable. We do home automation on it, and it works really well. It has some advanced features like auto restart of the virtual machine. If your virtual machine crashes, or even when you have a power outage and the server comes back up on its own, it spins off the virtual machines automatically. You don't have to do anything about it. It is pretty good.

I find the solution to be exceptionally stable. I've no reason to look for other solutions, honestly, because it is so stable. It just fits into your network and it just runs. No matter what you are doing, even if you do it wrong, nothing fails. The worst that can happen is that you allocate more resources than you actually have on the hardware platform. If you misallocate your resources and require more memory for your virtual sessions than is physically available on the platform, then you run into a little trouble. It doesn't fail, it just becomes a bit slow. Or it could get very slow, I guess, if you are careless. But it has never failed for me.

We live in an exceptionally small country. We have probably the lowest number of people per square kilometer in the world. There is only a group of about 20 or 25 IT professionals that I know about in our country. All of them are using VirtualBox. They are using other solutions as well, like Windows Hypervisor and VMware. The only reason why they do not convert 100% to VirtualBox from Windows Hypervisor and VMware is that they have already invested the money it cost them to get those solutions in the first place.

So, while VirtualBox is absolutely free and they definitely use it in their companies, it cost money for their companies to invest in Windows Hypervisor and VMware. It will not go over well if they just move away from those solutions to VirtualBox because they have already purchased them.

Oracle with VirtualBox rarely crashes since about version four onwards. It rarely crashes and rarely hangs. Although — I think it is on version six — sometimes I may take a snapshot and try to revert or even when I try to save a snapshot using Windows XP, sometimes the whole virtual machine crashes. But I am not sure if it is a fault with the software or something else because it only happens with one particular machine.

When you take three or four snapshots and you accumulate snapshots, it is as if at some point the snapshots get a bit mixed up in the machine, especially if you do not shut down. I have been helping some of my friends because they're not ready to move from XP. So I've gotten them to use Oracle VirtualBox for some solutions. One guy's machine crashed because they had been taking snapshot after snapshot. When we tried to restore it, we could not restore the machine back. So it happens, but rarely. But all in all, from Windows 7 downwards, I have not seen any problems with the VirtualBox. I actually love it. It's really stable for me.

I noticed also that if you do not shut it down regularly and you are constantly hibernating or pausing, that can be a really big headache. Sometimes the computer may freeze and you have to go back to the machine's original state.

I have had no issues with the stability.

There is an issue with stability only when I used it with phpVirtualBox.

The solution is stable.

I am unsure as to how stable this solution would be in a production environment. I have always thought of it as an R&D solution, as opposed to a production solution. It isn't a problem related to VirtualBox, but rather, simply how I have chosen to use it.

I have had no issues with stability.

The solution is stable.

It has been consistently stable over the past year. We didn't have any down time. All of the images were always perfectly done.

It's funny; sometimes one of the IT departments would say, "Well, why don't you convert your VirtualBox to VMware?" That means I have to redo the whole thing. So, I said, "Forget it. I'll stay with this one." Don't add more fire to a fire. Just leave it as it is. If it isn’t working, then maybe you try to put it out with water, but that doesn't work sometimes. Just stay where it is. It’s meant to be like that.

I find the solution to be incredibly unstable, constantly falling over and not working properly.

It is stable. It is more stable than it used to be.

I think that it is a stable solution. It is small, light, and can virtualize my development for testing.

I think VirtualBox has good stability because I use it in an environment with several resolutions. VirtualBox is able to use the full functionality and the powerfulness of the server I installed VirtualBox on this environment. So I, at the moment, I'm satisfied with the stability of the VirtualBox environment. I'm able to run several guest environments on one node.

In terms of stability, if we would have used it in the production, then I would have been able to comment on that. Since we used it only for the development environment and just for the testing it would be difficult to comment. We only used the solution for three months.

We have had no issues with the stability.

Sometimes it is not quite good. I have to research answers to re-stabilize the product I would give it a rating of eight out of ten in terms of stability.

There were some issues with the toolbar menu when using two monitors. In the end, I managed to get those issues resolved either with changing the virtual machine configuration or by updating to a newer version of Oracle VM Virtualbox.

Sometimes a VM doesn't start normally and I have to reinstall the product. It could be a combination of Windows' and Virtualbox's issues.

Oracle VM VirtualBox is stable.

There are not very many bugs in the application.

The solution is very stable.

We had no stability issues.

Sometimes on the Windows version, the product hangs for reasons unknown, but the Linux version is very stable.

There have been no issues with the stability.

Oracle VM VirtualBox is stable. 

We've had no issues with stability.

VirtualBox is a very stable product and we found no problems.

We've had no issues with the stability.

We had no issues with the stability.

The solution is very stable. It doesn't have bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

The solution is stable. It is great. 

The stability is okay, but it could be better.

No stability issues were experienced.

Sometimes the VirtualBox stops and the process cannot be killed. The computer then needs to be restarted.

It works perfectly for the task. We've had no issues with instability. It's a solid open-source product.

There were some small instability issues with version 5.0, but they seem to all be fixed now. It works perfectly.

Oracle VM VirtualBox is stable.