WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system. Its performance is also not up to the market standard, and its agility and adaptability could be improved.

WebCenter content access has a lot of options and flexibility. At this time, I only see one problem: in the sub-content and channels surrounding Windows 10.

It only functions with Windows 7 and Windows 8. All of the operating systems in my company are up-to-date and we are using Windows 10. For whatever reason, you can't use the Oracle content on these platforms at all. This lapse is very bad for my company because I can't change the version of Word and downgrade. Maybe it is just a technical problem. 

But it is a lot of my problem with this solution currently.

The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product.

It would be helpful if Oracle could create some sort of facility to customize templates easily if users use JavaScript or other internal tools.

This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language. It is needed for the forms, as well as the tabs in the software itself.

In terms of what needs to be improved, I would say the speed of the backup should be enhanced. When it takes too long for you to back up your application for your DR, disaster recovery site, it becomes a cumbersome job to do. They could enhance the bandwidth or something so that it is easier to do the backup at the end of every month or at the end of a cycle.

Additionally, it should have an automated configuration, it should be very scalable, and it should allow you to be able to monitor your deployments. It should also have an automated database and application backup that allows reporting from any point in time. Finally, it should be easy for you to migrate from on-prem to the cloud when the decision to move to the cloud is taken. I think those are the key things.

• Its functions need more stability. 
• The user interface needs to be improved.
• I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features.  

We are OK with WebCenter, but we're not very happy with the API because when the devices come from the customer, they're not able to scan and read properly. We're working with Oracle on this issue right now.

UCX needs improvement and better APIs for integration with custom and third-party apps; better layouts for mobility.

Some parts of the product seemed to be unstable; various exceptions which lead to reaching out for Oracle support. Using WSRP (Web service remote portlets) seems to be messy in terms of application deployment.

There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market.

I would like to see better performance.

Rules for contents personalization, workflows, publishing content, and the satellite cache all have room for improvement!