Palo Alto Networks Panorama Room for Improvement

Sakher Najdawi
Head of IT Department at a logistics company
The dual WAN functionality is missing in this solution. View full review »
NetworkAa5e9
Network Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees
My pain point is the automation process is not well-documented. There are some things that they could improve on there. If you go in the system to search for something, it is not intuitive. They could really improve that. There is a concept of device groups and a concept of templates. The templates can allow for inheritance, but the device groups do not. View full review »
Mohamed Sharaf
Security Consultant
I have had some leakage issues before, but it was solved. I would, however like to see better integration with other products. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, FireMon, AlgoSec and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: October 2019.
378,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Amer Alkatheri
Senior Security Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
It can take a few minutes to test to see if any changes are successful or not. This needs to be improved. A change commit should take a second, not a minute or more. Panorama does suffer from performance issues, which they need to resolve. Also, technical support isn't very responsive and could use some improvement. View full review »
Infosecon456
Information Security Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The general customer feedback is when saving the configuration, it takes a long time. That needs to be fixed. The troubleshooting, the debugging part is also a little bit of a pain. It's not user-friendly on the interface to do our debugging when comparing it with other firewalls, like Forcepoint. It would be nice to have a real-time traffic monitoring console similar to Forcepoint firewalls where you can see in real-time instead of having to keep on refreshing, or maybe a command on the console where you are able to see the traffic. The solution needs to work on speeding up the committing time. View full review »
MohamedMansour
Security Unit Manager at Digital Hub Egypt
The solution needs to improve its pricing model. Panorama needs to work on its configuration issues. They should also focus on firewall management. Many clients have multiple firewalls, so Palo Alto should offer better management of them. They could model themselves off of AlgoSec, or maybe FireMon which are other very good firewall management tools. View full review »
Engineerinfosec67
Senior Information Security Engineer at Westcon
I think the multitenancy of this solution can be improved. I would also like to see better management task automation for the trial environment. That is missing in this solution. In the next version, I would like to have more integration with the cloud and with the services delivered by Palo Alto. It isn't very task integrated at this stage. I would also like more dashboard management. View full review »
Execmgr567
Executive Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
There is room for improvement in the integration within endpoint detection. They need to do some integration between endpoints and the firewalls. They also need to add a mobile version for product so we can access the interface easily. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, FireMon, AlgoSec and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: October 2019.
378,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email