I am familiar with Cisco. I have also worked with several Palo Alto solutions, including the 5000, 8000, and firewalls managed by Panorama 6520 and 80.

Palo Alto Wildfire is not yet ready for implementation. We do not have the required license. With the current policy, we will not be implementing Wildfire.

I will propose the use of that in order to add another layer of security to our network.

We have used Fortinet and Cisco before.

I have also used pfSense.

We've previously used Cisco, Salesforce, and Fortinet. We last used Salesforce, and we mainly switched due to the cost of the solution.

We do have other solutions that we run in parallel, but it isn't like we had one solution and then we switched to Palo Alto.

Before, we used Fortinet and Check Point.

I used to use ASA, which is now owned by Cisco. I feel Palo Alto is more advanced and has better features than ASA.