The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version. 

The solution is neither inexpensive nor expensive, so I rate pricing a three out of ten. 

It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses.

The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side so is rated a seven out of ten. 

The pricing is pretty good. It's reasonable. I'd rate it four out of five. Of course, it could always be a bit lower. 

I have the full Pro Prevent license. So, I've got post analytics, forensics, and the whole lot of it.

Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual.

I am not aware of the fees, it is handled by our financial department.

The solution is very expensive.

I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

We pay in advance for the product's license. It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company. We can split this payment monthly, quarterly, or yearly, according to the customer's requirements. For a cost-benefit analysis when choosing a security solution, consider factors such as the number of attacks prevented, the impact of those attacks, potential losses, and other hidden costs.

I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive.

It is "expensive" and flexible.

Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis.

Corporate is responsible for licensing. I don't know anything about the pricing.

It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis.

The pricing is actually very reasonable. Palo Alto is very invested in some commercial endeavors and they have simplified their license. A team license can be used on-cloud, or on-prem. We have not faced segregation on any technologies, so a simple license gets any user anywhere without limitations. It is easy to increase the license as it's a cloud service. You just speak to your account manager and they can increase the licenses for you.

The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help.

Customers tend to rather have a less expensive solution than the best one.

I rate the price of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks an eight out of ten.

The setup is quite easy. We had appropriate support from the manager. One thing that was missing was the integration part. Currently, they don't have out-of-box integration with IBM QRadar, or if they have the integration, the integration doesn't work well. That is something that they have to look at going forward.

It took around three to four weeks, because there was a full process change, and then we had to get approval for getting it deployed. 

In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage.

I recommend that the company review the pricing model in the Latin American market. They need to determine how to impose, or how to bring a more accessible cost in order to accelerate the implementations in American countries.

The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month.

It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff.

We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR.

The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic. So, if you have 1100 computers today, you can license that. Therefore, as long as you're below your licensing cap, you're fine.

Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable. I rate Cortex XDR a five out of ten for pricing.

It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing.

Cortex XDR's pricing is ok. We pay about $20 a year for our license.

This is a very costly product.

The price is on the higher side, but it's okay.

I don't like that they have different types of licenses.

On a scale from one to nine, I would give licensing costs a seven.

In comparison to other competing products, it is based on the customer's needs and the environment. However, when compared to other products, the price is slightly higher, but when considering technology and new innovation, that is the plus I would say when it comes to being XDR.

The price could be more competitive because it is not on the price wall when you go and question Palo Alto XDR. It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable.

The setup costs are a bit higher than some other solutions. Overall it is a little bit expensive, I think. If we could get it for around a 10% discount then that would be a better price point for us.  

For our pricing plan, we are not on a subscription, so we do not have to pay every month. We have a yearly license for the product.  

The approximate amount we pay per license is around $80 per user per year.  

We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice.

I do not deal with licensing costs. That is taken care of by our sales team.

I am using the Community edition.

The pricing is quite good. It's interesting. It's not a particularly expensive option. 

It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool.

Our license runs on a monthly basis with a recurring monthly charge. If you want additional options like secure remote access with policies, that requires an additional cost. 

Palo Alto Networks Traps does not apply secure remote access to devices without policies, which we are implementing. If you want to apply more policies, like an anti-virus program, anti-malware, or configurations for using a VPN on remote connections, that would also be an additional cost. We're not doing that.

Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there.

The price of the product is not very economical. It is suitable for clients that have a lot of money to invest.

The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis. 

When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward.

We did not negotiate the price because the solution did not fulfill our requirements. But the price was fine. I don't know how it would compare with Symantec because I negotiated a lot with Symantec. I don't know what kind of negotiation I could have done with Palo Alto.

Ask your local dealer.

The pricing is cheap.

For basic needs, the solution isn't very expensive. However, as you grow more complex in your needs, the more you use, the more costly it can get.

The licensing is typically for one year. There's a one-time installation. If you would like to continue with the service, you can continue. There's no need to install and reinstall.

I feel it is fairly priced.

I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price.

The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive.

You do have to pay for a license in order to use a solution. It's expensive.

So far, I have made use of the free license which is offered. Once it ended, I was able to buy a license based on the number of users or divisions. The license varies with the number of users or applications involved. 

If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them. 

This is an expensive solution.

It has a yearly renewal.

The price of the solution is high for the license and in general.

Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider. It's quite expensive, and they can't sell it for less than 200 euros a license. It's the lowest license price we can get from them.

This is an expensive solution.

Our clients pay for the license every year. It's just a standard fee with no additional costs. 

The price could be improved. Our customers have expressed that the price is high. When compared with other services, it's more expensive, but it's not too high.