There are always glitches in every product, but the solution is reliable overall.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

The solution is certainly stable. I have worked with many vendors' firewalls and Palo Alto's are definitely stable.

The solution is stable.

It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is a stable solution.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

In terms of stability, it's quite reliable once it's up and running. I'd rate it a 9 out of 10. However, it's not a perfect 10 due to the need for manual intervention, especially during firmware upgrades and certificate management. This aspect isn't as seamless as with cloud-native firewalls.

This product is very stable. We have had zero problems with stability.

The product's stability is good. Considering the cloud availability, I can say that the product is 99.99 percent stable. The firewall functions properly on the cloud, and there has been no downtime in the last couple of years. Unless the cloud services from Microsoft Azure go down, the firewall works properly.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine or ten out of ten.

The stability is good. The vendor communicates about the releases in advance. We keep updating the operating systems based on compliance and security notifications.

I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten.

The stability is good.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

I rate the product's stability a ten out of ten.

It is stable and robust solution. Through Panorama manager, we can scale up automatically if the demand increase. At the moment, we do not have any problems with its stability.

I did not find any bugs in the tool. However, we'll face some issues if we do not configure it properly.

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is stable. 

VM-Series is highly stable. One of our clients has been using it for one year, and we've been using it for a year and a half. There were some bugs initially, but in the past two years, it has gotten more stable. 

Stability has so far been good. We monitor the resources on the firewall to determine if there will be any spikes on the CPU, RAM utilization, or the load of the firewall. Though, we are yet not putting much load on it. 

The product is stable.

The stability is absolutely good and there is no problem with it.

The stability is fine. The product has been running well so far.

We have about 150 contractors who log into Palo Altos. We don't put heavy stress on them, but they are working fine for now.

We are very much satisfied with the stability and performance.

It is very stable. We have almost never had an issue.

We have around 15 VM-Series, which are running hot all day.

I think the stability of Palo Alto is good — leaning towards very good.  

We are typically at only about eight to ten percent load.

It is stable. We haven't had any issues and don't think about the stability.

From time to time, maybe twice a year, they have released content updates which have some issues. When they release content updates, the applications with these updates give us a false positives. I manage older software developers and members, and almost everyone has one or two missteps a year regarding these updates.

It has a good performance which helps you with the stability of your virtual environment.

The stability is excellent. We have about 50 to 60 employees on it per day. Then, we have about 100 edge connected devices coming through it as well.

I rate Palo Alto Networks VM-Series' stability as ten out of ten. 

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series can be made more stable. I have seen some bugs in the solution. After deployment with an API call, you can use an HA solution in two scenarios, namely, as a load balancer and for API calls. I see that in the Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, there are some delays when it comes to an API call configuration.

We like its stability.

This firewall is quite stable and we haven't faced any kinds of issues.

This solution is stable.

The solution is reliable. 

Stability-wise, this product is great.

At the moment, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series has been stable. 

I rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten. 

We have not had trouble with bugs or glitches.

I didn't see any issues with its stability. 

None. Works by day with no issues.

It has good stability. We haven't had any issues, and it has never been down. 

No issues. We did integration with NSXi and the system works likes a charm. There have not been any issues in regards to the format, delivery, or management. It has worked great.

It is very stable, and we are not putting stress on it.

No issues, it is very stable. It is fairly easy to use. I would not say it is difficult, just sometimes it can be a bit sluggish navigating through pages. That is just purely because of Java.

The stability is very good. There aren't bugs, glitches, or crashes. It's very reliable.

This solution is stable.