Palo Alto Networks WildFire Previous Solutions

Girish Vyas
Architect - Cloud Serviced at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Before, we used FortiGate, Cisco ASA, and FirePower. FortiGate is a good competitor to Palo Alto based on the pricing and functionality that it offers. For our best abilities and branding requirements, Palo Alto has more value when compared to FortiGate. View full review »
SridharSingh
Associate Director at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I have prior experience with Cisco Firepower. But, they are very expensive in comparison to Palo Alto. View full review »
it_user514461
Sr. Network Engineer at a tech services company
This is a fairly unique feature offered by Palo Alto Networks (may be comparable to FireEye). As such, it was an addition to our existing protection suites. View full review »
Itnetw355
IT Network Consultant Engineer - Projects and ICT Infrastructure Services at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I have worked with Cisco, Fortinet, Juniper, CheckPoint, too many of them. View full review »
reviewer818484
Information Security Officer at a government with 501-1,000 employees
We previously used a different solution but it was ineffective and didn't integrate well. View full review »
Brent Addis
Senior Network and Security Engineer
We previously used Fortinet. However, we found it to miss a lot of incoming viruses, because at the time, they had no sandbox style service. View full review »
Bachir Elsitt
Network Security Engineer at Data Consult
I used Cisco. Palo Alto is better for datacenter and Cisco for perimeter. View full review »
Ahmed Ismail
Security Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I have previous experience with FireEye and Symantec. I find that Symantec is a standalone on an enterprise level secure market, which I cannot say for WildFire. View full review »

Sign Up with Email