Palo Alto Networks WildFire Previous Solutions

Girish Vyas
Architect - Cloud Serviced at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
We have not compared this product with other but we would like to evaluate the options if they are available. View full review »
SridharSingh
Associate Director at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I have prior experience with Cisco Firepower. But, they are very expensive in comparison to Palo Alto. View full review »
it_user514461
Sr. Network Engineer at a tech services company
This is a fairly unique feature offered by Palo Alto Networks (may be comparable to FireEye). As such, it was an addition to our existing protection suites. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, FireEye, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Itnetw355
IT Network Consultant Engineer - Projects and ICT Infrastructure Services at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I have worked with Cisco, Fortinet, Juniper, CheckPoint, too many of them. View full review »
reviewer818484
Information Security Officer at a government with 501-1,000 employees
We previously used a different solution but it was ineffective and didn't integrate well. View full review »
Bachir Elsitt
Network Security Engineer at Data Consult
I used Cisco. Palo Alto is better for datacenter and Cisco for perimeter. View full review »
Ahmed Ismail
Security Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I have previous experience with FireEye and Symantec. I find that Symantec is a standalone on an enterprise level secure market, which I cannot say for WildFire. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, FireEye, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email