Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Stability
It is very stable. A lot of times, it depends on what our network tweaks are, e.g., we monitor the link between the firewall and the router. If it misses some heartbeats on that, then it will switch over. That is part of how the HA process works. If it says I am not getting network connectivity, then it tells the other one to take over. We actually have an exciting way to do that because we have one data center at the top of the hill at the front-end of Boulder (or on the south-end.) We have another one in the HA link about 13 miles away at the north-end of Boulder. We actually do an HA pair across there using a 200-gig link with dark fiber between them. Most people, with their HA pairs, will be right next to each other, but ours are only that way on a globe.
View full review »They push stuff out that is not quite ready. If you use the product one version back, then you are pretty good. However, if you try to stay cutting edge, you are going to run into stuff that doesn't work. They are forever releasing stuff that doesn't work right or as designed. Every company does that though, so it is just a question of who is worse. You need to be careful with some of the newer stuff that they release. You need to bake it very well before you put it into production.
View full review »I have had some issues here recently, but it has been more operating system issues. As far as the hardware goes, they have been very solid. Out of the last three or four years that we have utilized Palo Alto Network NG Firewalls. I have only had one time where I had a hardware failure on it that had to get a replacement.
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Palo Alto firewalls are stable compared to Fortinet, Check Point, or Cisco. From time to time, the firewall is unstable, but that's related to the connection 99 percent of the time. I recommend doing a test with a resource monitor to see if the model is right for you.
The stability of this solution is unbelievable and the best on the market. We've never had an outage as a result of a technical problem on hundreds of firewalls that we run or thousands when we include the HA pairs and clusters that we've built.
View full review »The solution is very stable.
View full review »Palo Alto firewalls are solid. I can recall that we haven't had platform failures or product issues with the Palo Alto Firewalls. Everything can have a power supply failure. We have seen that occasionally, but it's rare. In eight years, we've had to replace power supplies in two firewalls out of hundreds we've deployed. It's a physically stable platform, and the software is also solid. I typically avoid the most recent software versions until they reach what I consider mature and seasoned.
We've seldom had issues with performance. I always tell people that internet bandwidth will be bigger and cheaper in the future, so firewalls need to keep pace from a performance standpoint. Palo Alto has done a decent job of bringing out new models with higher throughput levels while maintaining all the threat-driven functions. But we constantly need to evaluate where we are with internet bandwidth and where we expect to be in the future.
We tell people that the physical hardware platform they choose will protect them today, no matter which one. However, the choice will determine how long that can stay in your network. It ultimately comes down to pure bandwidth. As we move towards the cloud, more and more internet bandwidth becomes critical. Multiple internet providers are now essential on most of our customers' networks. The raw bandwidth and performance through the box must keep up with that. Palo Alto's newer platforms have multiple-gigabit throughput, and I assume they'll continue with that as they evolve the product line further.
View full review »It's extremely stable. We've used it on the parameter and as a core firewall in our data center. In both cases, it's what we rely on today.
View full review »I give the stability a nine out of ten.
View full review »MJ
reviewer2152974
Senior Network Administrator at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
It's very stable. We have had no issues. There are only two issues that I recall ever happening on our firewalls. The first one was when they released an application ID that caused a problem on the network, but they were able to resolve it quickly within a matter of hours. The second issue was also because of the change in the OS. In both cases, the resolution was quick.
View full review »QV
Quoc Vo
Director Of Technology at La Jolla Country Day School
It is very stable. We have never had any issues with any failures on it.
I haven't felt any performance lags on it. It has been handling everything just fine.
View full review »AG
Adarsh Gopakumar
Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We have had a very minimal number of false positives with the solution and it has been very stable. There have been no issues with the firewall itself. In the previous case, we had a lot of tension between the firmware update and the customer service department. This was due to the system working itself up. We had absolutely zero capability issues.
View full review »It is extremely stable.
GH
Gerry Hicks
CyberSecurity Network Engineer at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
The stability is fire and forget. You don't have to worry about it. I've had to babysit Cisco devices in the past but I've never had to do the same with Palo Alto.
I've always had really good assets over the years and in all, they have changed perhaps two or three of them. Overall, they've been wonderful.
The solution is stable.
View full review »Palo Alto is the most stable firewall that I have experience with. Firepower is second to Palo Alto. Fortinet is third coming in just after Firepower. Meraki is in there around number 100. The stability of that solution is absolutely horrific. That it is a security device — a firewall — makes that relatively more frightening because it affects the stability of the entire infrastructure.
Palo Alto's stability means that it is always on the alert and it keeps infrastructure safe.
When it comes to network security, there is no such thing as stability; every day brings different forms of attacks, which we must constantly work to prevent.
OM
reviewer1400883
Chief Architect at a recruiting/HR firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
It has been very stable.
On the maintenance side, we haven't increased our team at all. One of the great things that we have been able to improve is the capability of our team without increasing the number of heads who are using Palo Alto.
View full review »GT
Geo Thomas
Network Security Engineer at Diyar United Company
Its stability is fine. I'm happy with it.
View full review »BR
reviewer1324731
Manager - Project at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The solution is stable. We encounter small bugs sometimes but they are not a problem.
View full review »Compared to other solutions, it is very stable.
View full review »The solution is stable.
View full review »JS
Jonny Su
IS&S Europe and Global Infrastructure Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The solution is pretty stable. Once you have it configured, normally it shouldn't have any issues. It does sometimes impact the metric flow, but that's natural because it filters everything going through, so it slows down the speed.
View full review »NS
reviewer2169336
Head Of CERT at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees
We have not had any issues with stability. I have not heard from our SOC about issues with devices either.
View full review »MC
reviewer2171649
CISO at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would rate the stability of Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls a nine or ten out of ten.
View full review »AP
reviewer2171676
Sr Network Engineer/DBA at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees
Our downtime has not been reduced by Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. We experienced a DSL firewall incident that resulted in a five-hour downtime while we discovered the bug, and although I cannot entirely blame the firewall, it was still a part of the issue. However, we have learned to deal with this inconvenience.
It's quite stable. We had one issue because of a bug. Aside from that, everything has been fine.
View full review »HP
reviewer2168706
Security Architect at a government with 10,001+ employees
The firewalls are always on, and we haven't had any stability problems. We haven't even had any hardware failures, and the perishables are great.
View full review »AF
reviewer172354
Chief Data Center Operations at a government with 10,001+ employees
Stability-wise, we have three regions in which we use Palo Alto, and we are not pegging the resources for these boxes at all. They're meeting and exceeding our expectations in terms of stability, but we're definitely not pushing them to the limit.
View full review »There are no issues with stability. In most cases, they are very stable.
We recommend our customers to have an HA configuration with active/passive, which is very good in Palo Alto. It takes seconds to change from one firewall to another, which provides reliability and prevents loss of service because of a hardware problem or a network problem on a device. Having an HA environment makes your network resilient.
View full review »RG
reviewer2173245
Security Operations Manager at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
The stability is good.
View full review »SK
reviewer2171643
IT Specialist at a government with 501-1,000 employees
To say it's a set-and-forget system wouldn't be entirely accurate, but it is an incredibly stable and reliable system. Once it's set up and configured properly, you really just need to keep an eye on it for any necessary updates or new rules. In my experience, it's one of the most reliable systems available.
View full review »YP
reviewer1721973
Network administrator at a educational organization with 201-500 employees
For the most part, the stability is good but we sometimes face problems with the VPN connections.
View full review »YN
Yannick Nganyade
Network Solutions Architect at Ecobank Transnational Incorporated
It is very stable. We had two outages this year that were not good. They were related to OSPF bugs. Those bugs affected our service availability.
View full review »TG
reviewer1227594
Senior Network Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
The solution is pretty stable.
View full review »RP
reviewer2169324
CIO at a government with 201-500 employees
It is a rock-solid solution in terms of stability. You very rarely have to worry about it. If there's a problem, it's usually because a rule got configured incorrectly.
View full review »HI
reviewer1296072
IT Supervisor at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
The solution is incredibly stable.
We have installed patches and updates, and they have all gone smoothly without any issues.
View full review »The solution is very stable and robust.
View full review »JG
reviewer2169330
Sr Security Analyst at a mining and metals company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The firewalls are relatively stable. We have a few that go up and down, but that has more to do with licensing issues than with the firewall itself.
View full review »DS
reviewer1531437
Sr. Infrastructure Solution Architect and Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
It's always been a stable product.
View full review »The stability is good.
View full review »We have experienced 100% stability with this solution.
View full review »HE
Hamada Elewa
System Engineer - Security Presales at Raya Integration
It's a very stable firewall.
View full review »Stability in the sense of security and alerts, this solution is very good, and we have not had had any issues. However, web filtering and application-based approach are very poor.
View full review »AC
reviewer2171631
Engineering Manager at a security firm with 11-50 employees
It is a very solid, stable solution. We haven't had any issues with it, you know when we have to do updates there are no problems whatsoever. it's a very good solution.
View full review »The stability is very good. After the upgrade, every other process was smoother. We haven't often seen bugs or operational hazards in terms of the device.
The stability is good. It's a very stable device. That is the biggest lesson I have learned from using them.
View full review »TL
reviewer2171625
Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
The stability of Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is very good.
We have upgraded it several times for additional features, and we have never experienced any crashes or performance issues. Overall, it has been quite stable.
View full review »JB
reviewer2169345
CISO at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
I rate Palo Alto NG Firewalls a nine out of ten for stability. We have had zero downtime except for scheduled maintenance. The firewalls are in a cluster that never goes down.
View full review »RC
Qiwei Chen
Security Team Technical Manager at ECCOM Network System Co., Ltd.
Compared to its competitors, the stability of NG Firewalls is very good. We have faced some strange problems with the hardware platform or operating system. Most of these customer cases come from complicated configs and bugs. However, stability is very good overall.
View full review »SC
reviewer2186784
Network Engineer at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are stable.
View full review »LM
reviewer2173290
Manager, Cyber Security Risk & Compliance at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are stable.
View full review »MÇ
reviewer2134368
Security and IT Infrastruture Senior Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
I give the stability an eight out of ten.
View full review »TC
reviewer2171682
Compliance Analyst at a international affairs institute with 11-50 employees
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have been instrumental in reducing our downtime as we moved away from less robust devices. By implementing Palo Alto firewalls, we have significantly improved our network stability.
If I had to estimate, it has saved us 10 to 15 hours per year.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is a very stable solution.
View full review »MS
Mahmoud Salaheldin
Security Unit Manager at EEMC
I like the stability of the solution. From a stability perspective, all of them are stable. Sometimes Cisco's older versions, maybe from two years ago, were not as stable. Now, Cisco has improved its firewall and security products.
View full review »AA
Alaa Amro.
IT engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are stable.
View full review »AV
Andriy Voitynskyi
CAO at Bank "LVIV"
NP
Nilson Primo
Head of Engineering at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The firewalls are very stable.
View full review »TM
reviewer2173212
Team Leader at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
It has been very stable so far.
View full review »AM
reviewer1779540
Security Presales Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
They have a stable solution, stable hardware, and stable software since they have released multiple OSs. If there are any issues, they release a new OS. Each month, you will see new batches with a new OS introduced to customers. You can update it easily.
With Palo Alto Networks, you have a dedicated management plan. Therefore, if you face an issue regarding the management interface, e.g., the GUI and CLI of Palo Alto Networks, if you have any problem on that you can restart it without effects on the data streams.
View full review »The solution is extremely stable.
View full review »PC
reviewer2173272
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
It's pretty stable.
View full review »BT
reviewer2168700
Manager, Global Security Operations at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees
I have not heard of any complaints or issues regarding the stability of the firewalls.
View full review »RS
reviewer1075413
Senior Network Analyst at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees
They're very reliable and stable. Compared to some of the competitors, they're more reliable.
View full review »ES
Eric Steidle
Network Analyst at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is pretty reliable. All the services pretty much work. It is not too buggy. With any hardware/software manager these days, when you get new features, they tend to not be too thoroughly tested and can be buggy. We have been noticing this. For example, they had zero-touch deployment and the first few iterations just didn't work. While we have encountered a few bugs, I don't think they are any worse than anything else we get. The underlying hardware seems to be pretty reliable. You can do configuration changes, reboot and reload them, and they just keep coming back and work.
Our cybersecurity guys tend to do the patching and upgrades when they come around. When one of these things had a hard disk failure, they got that restored or replaced. For day-to-day maintenance, other than typical operational changes and troubleshooting, I don't think there is that much maintenance to be done. Every few weeks, there is probably somebody who goes for a few hours and checks the various patch levels and possibly does upgrades.
The upgrades are fairly easy to do. You just download the software, the central management system, and tick off the devices that you want to deploy it to. It will automatically download it. Then, you just sort of schedule a reboot. I don't know how many hours per week or month people put into it, but it is pretty reasonable.
View full review »TI
Tijoy CI
Senior Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The product is stable.
View full review »KK
reviewer1122564
IT Network Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees
The stability is great. They're not going anywhere. They're the industry leader.
View full review »DB
reviewer2173221
Program Manager, Cybersecurity at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
They're pretty robust. They also have Unit 42, which is their threat intelligence team. They make you feel safer because they can identify the threats and then implement protection from those into their firewall.
View full review »JP
reviewer2171667
Security Engineer at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees
The stability of Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is good.
View full review »BM
reviewer2171652
Cloud and Data Center Ops at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is a very stable solution.
View full review »IK
reviewer1404666
Security Expert at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
So far, it's stable. I haven't had any problem with it. I'm always authorizing to have the minor version aligned with the latest version. There haven't been any published vulnerabilities with the product so far.
View full review »The solution is very stable; we don't have any problems with the stability.
View full review »CD
reviewer2173320
Deputy Project Leader for CVE at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
It is a stable solution.
View full review »NK
reviewer2171685
M&B at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Since we have definitely used Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, it's not possible to compare them with any other product.
The stability of Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is good.
View full review »Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is a stable solution.
View full review »The product is stable. I rate its stability a ten out of ten.
View full review »TH
Tirut Hawoldar
Manager IT Security & Infrastructure at Currimjee Jeewanjee & Co. Ltd.
The big firewalls, like the PA-300 and the PA-3020, are very good, stable, and performant. They are very reliable. The smaller models are reliable, but the performance on their management plane is a bit slow. Even the management plane of the PA-850 is a bit slow when you compare it to some of the bigger models.
View full review »LS
reviewer1590417
Director of Information Technology at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is stable.
View full review »ŁC
reviewer1498575
IT Architect at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
In my experience, the stability is very good.
View full review »GP
reviewer1360215
Server Administrator and Operation Manager at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
The stability is excellent. It's reliable. We don't deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Overall, it's been very good in terms of performance.
View full review »JH
reviewer2173284
Information Security Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
It's very stable. They are highly ranked within their space.
View full review »LH
reviewer2171622
Information Security Specialist at a government with 501-1,000 employees
In my experience, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have been a stable solution.
View full review »The solution is incredibly stable.
View full review »MA
reviewer1517283
Network Security Head at a government with 51-200 employees
This solution is very stable.
View full review »RK
reviewer1461615
Sr. Product Management Specialist at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
It is stable.
View full review »VV
Virendra Vishnu
Vice President of Digital Transformation at Sysnet Global Technologies
It's a very stable product, so far.
View full review »SG
reviewer1422384
Network Administrator at a real estate/law firm with 201-500 employees
The firewalls are very stable. We've had no issues with downtime.
View full review »MV
reviewer1523322
Senior Staff Security Engineer at a renewables & environment company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Its stability is good.
View full review »In my company, I am responsible for the development of the proposal that we give to the client. We develop the spectrum and the pricing. We make presentations to the customer to explain the solution and answer questions about it.
View full review »MV
Maksim Vedernikov
Quality engineer of the 1st category at Modern Expo
It's been 10 years and I don't remember any outages because of a hardware failure or a logical error in configuration. We had problems with servers or switches initially but it works like a charm now.
VP
reviewer1350975
Head of IT Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The stability is excellent.
View full review »The solution has proven itself to be quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable in terms of performance.
View full review »AK
reviewer1509057
Chief of IT security department at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have found Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls to be a very stable solution and very convenient solution.
View full review »AM
reviewer1485417
Partner Alliance Director at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution is quite stable. We don't have bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's quite good and we've been happy with it.
View full review »AM
Asad Mukhtar
Information Security Specialist at UAEU
In the past two years I haven't had any issues with the stability. That applies to the hardware, software, upgrades, updates, new feeds. I haven't faced any big issue, you can say that.
ST
Swapnil Talegaonkar
Technology consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The stability is good in the Palo Alto firewall.
There are occasionally issues with reporting, otherwise stability is fine.
View full review »KR
Kamlesh Ridhorkar
Sr. Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
The stability of the solution is good. It's quite reliable. I haven't experienced bugs or glitches that affect its performance. It doesn't crash.
View full review »GS
reviewer2173293
Analyst at a non-tech company
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are pretty stable.
JH
Jan Hammer
Marine Consultant/Captain/Senior DPO at Jan Arild Hammer
It is very stable.
View full review »Palo Alto NG is a stable product as long as it's working. It does what it expected to do. But sometimes for some reason the hardware resources spike, so it stops responding.
The only fix is to restart the firewall,i.e. a hardware restart. This is one of the issues. It's not related to the software because of the troubleshooting that we did.
It's about resource consumption. Some hardware and software issues Palo Alto needs to work on. They released their Palo Alto Operating System which enhanced their product suite.
View full review »GP
reviewer1881372
Professional Services Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
From a stability point of view, the firewall is very stable because the PAN-OS version doesn't change very often. If a new PAN-OS version is out in the market, our engineering team checks it multiple times.
The network performance is never compromised.
View full review »TB
reviewer1522938
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It is working fine.
View full review »ST
MD.SIHAB TALUKDAR
System Engineer at asa
It's definitely a stable solution.
View full review »RK
Kumar_Rajesh
Vice President & Head Technology Transition at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The solution is generally stable. There are no issues. We have forty-thousand users.
View full review »GS
Georges Samaha
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
From my experience, it's the best hardware compared to other NG firewalls from the perspective of performance stability. While the other firewalls lose 50 or 60% of performance when enabling all policies, Palo Alto loses 10 to 20% maximum, even with enabled IPS and fire detection and all. From our experience performance-wise, it's one of the best hardware solutions for firewalls.
We haven't lost performance really, so I would describe it as very stable. There are not any issues.
View full review »IG
Ibrahim Ghanem
Head of Information Network Security at FRA
The solution is very stable, but I think the local providers have no sufficient products. We are looking for more support.
View full review »DL
Denis L
Sales Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
It's a great firewall, really one of the best in the market. It is one of few firewalls that can claim to be better than Cisco. It functions well, is very stable, and its reputation is known in the market.
View full review »MM
InfTech4985
Head, Information Technology at a construction company with 201-500 employees
It's very stable.
View full review »It's stable.
View full review »SM
Sarvajith Mony
Technical Manager at PSR
Palo Alto suggests version 9.1.7 for stability. When new features come out, things are not as stable.
View full review »JJ
reviewer1355130
Solutions Architect at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
I am completely happy with its stability. I have no issues with its stability.
SZ
reviewer1461459
Team Lead Network Infrastructure at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
The solution offers very good stability. I don't have issues with bugs or glitches. It's reliable.
View full review »AE
Antonio El Khoury
System Engineer at IRIS
This is a stable firewall and you don't have a lot of surprises. The performance, throughput, and decryption are all good. It is important to remember that at the end of the day, it depends on the configuration.
For special functionality, you are going to have some exceptions. However, for the well-known functionality, it is stable.
View full review »SP
reviewer2063289
Senior information technology consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We have found this to be a stable solution during our time working with it.
View full review »MG
Mark Gleghorn
President at MT-Data
The stability is awesome. I haven't had any issues with the solution stability-wise. I've got the same firewalls that have been out there for five years and they work great.
View full review »AP
Amar-Patil
Security Engineer at Hitachi Systems, Ltd.
It's quite stable. They are launching a new firmware version, but compared to other products, Palo Alto is quite stable.
View full review »BE
Bachir Elsitt
Network Security Engineer at Data Consult
Palo Alto is very stable. I worked on Cisco products like FTD and Firepower, and they are not as stable as Palo Alto. Also, some Fortigates are not stable. Palo Alto, as far as I know, is the most stable firewall compared to these others.
View full review »RR
Rakesh Rawat
Network Engineer at Acliv Technologies Pvt Ltd
Stability is good.
View full review »AL
reviewer1319013
Cyber Security Specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The solution has been extremely stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable.
View full review »EW
reviewer1290441
Cyber Security Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The stability is generally pretty good. I haven't heard any complaints from our customers around Palo Alto's stability. It's one of the reasons why they're the leaders in this space.
We've got our own team for maintenance. My company is a large multinational with 20,000 employees.
View full review »EB
EmreBektas
Senior Technical Consultant at Exclusive GRP
It's a very stable solution.
View full review »AS
Abhirup Sarkar
Director, Middle East, East India & SAARC at DMX Technologies
It was fine normally, but during peak business hours, it used to have challenges. We faced this issue at least two to three times a month.
View full review »PS
reviewer1528854
Technology Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
It is stable.
View full review »TM
reviewer1001214
Sr. Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
While the solution itself is okay in terms of stability, there could be issues if the hardware is affected. We have hardware that gets affected by humidity, for example, which can end up affecting a wide range of infrastructure. If the environment is good, the solution will be okay. If we talking about Palo Alto's series starting from the 3,000 to 5,000 or 7,000, Palo Alto has a really stable product.
View full review »HC
Humbert Choi
Cyber Security Trainee at Macroview Telecom Limited
We have had no complaints about stability.
View full review »JC
reviewer1527636
Technical Manager El Salvador at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Its stability is perfect. It has excellent stability.
View full review »ST
Shrihari Taluri
Senior Network Security Engineer at Locuz Enterprise Solutions Ltd
In terms of stability, we have had a very good experience with this product. I would say that it is excellent.
View full review »MS
reviewer1525950
ITSM Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
It is stable and reliable.
View full review »VK
Vladimir Kiseliov
Information Technology Project Manager at JSC "Penkiu kontinentu komunikaciju centras"
PA-220 Next-Generation Firewall is a stable solution.
View full review »MJ
reviewer1371849
CIO/CTO at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees
We used the product on a daily basis and have had no critical issues so far.
View full review »TA
Thameem Ansari
Senior solution architect at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
This is a stable product.
View full review »KZ
Khawaja AhsanZia
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The product is generally stable but with each new update you need to get the OS bug fix. Any security device has a vulnerability which a hacker can exploit and you have to keep on patching.
VS
reviewer1210221
Team Leader at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The solution is very stable.
View full review »ME
reviewer1386969
Security Presales Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
It is stable.
View full review »SK
reviewer1599615
Network Security Engineer
This solution is stable and reliable.
View full review »RN
reviewer1460898
Lead Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
So far, this solution has been stable.
View full review »BF
reviewer1515033
Network Engineer & Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It is stable, but its stability can be better.
View full review »TT
reviewer1516101
Cloud Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is very reliable.
View full review »HD
Hari Pandu Dairi
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
On performance and stability, I've never heard any complaints. The product is running well and easily maintained by an admin.
View full review »KN
reviewer1483797
Service Delivery Engineer - Network Security Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
This is a very stable solution.
View full review »The solution is very stable.
View full review »OO
NGfrwall677
Sales Engineer at a wholesaler/distributor with 51-200 employees
The solution's stability is normal.
View full review »TM
Partnerf4b9
Partner & vCISO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The stability is good.
View full review »AA
reviewer1597335
System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
I have not found any bugs, this solution is stable.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.