The solution is a cloud feed so is scalable. Continued expansion with integrations will allow even more scalability. 

I would rate the scalability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention a ten out of ten.

Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is suitable for small to large-sized companies. It scales well.

We have three to four clients using this solution.

We have about 30,000 servers using this solution. It's not for end-users; it's for computers, for servers. It can scale to meet your needs. 

I rate the application’s scalability an eight out of ten.

The solution is scalable. It can consume all firewall capabilities.

We have more than 2,000 to 3,000 users using this solution.

I rate the tool’s scalability a seven out of ten.

The solution is quite scalable.

The scalability of the solution is very good. In our company, we have about 2,000 users.

Both the scalability and stability of this solution are fine for our needs.

Scalability is not a problem from a technical standpoint. However, the price of this solution makes it hard to scale.

We have approximately one thousand users.

There isn't a firewall on earth available at the moment that's more scalable than Palo Alto. It's in the tens of thousands. We are servicing clients and we tally all the users from those clients together and it's in the tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands. We are a reseller, so I can only speak in terms of our clients. We have at least tens of thousands of users. Palo Alto is the most scalable firewall out there by far.

The solution is scalable. 

The scalability of Palo Alto Threat Prevention is very good. For most of the requirements, we find it very easy to implement and deploy.

We have about 20,000 users on Level One, 80 agents at Level Two, and around 30 big operations on Level Three.

It is scalable. We haven't confronted any issues.

So far, scalability is okay, but you don't really need too much scalability in a firewall solution.

I have found Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention to be a scalable solution.

The scalability is there, for an enterprise network or a big company. It's good. It can support many endpoints and servers. We have over 2,000 users, most of them are end-users.

For my organization, there is more than enough scalability for me. It is good for me. Exactly what I want.

I don't see a problem with Palo Alto Threat Prevention in scalability. Because it's a testing product for use it only for test alignment.

We have maybe 10 or 12 engineers dedicated to the solution. Only engineers are using this product. For deployment and maintenance, only one staff.

We use Palo Alto Threat Prevention just for testing.

I think it's very scalable, but in terms of the firewall, you need to define first where the firewall is located. You can deploy it anywhere, but it really depends on the environment of the customer.