Our primary use case is for our process and we have different phases where we do testing and we have what we called IT and BPA testing. So it is a combined group of IT people and business people doing the testing after the setup. We have what we call the UFA, the user acceptance test, so those are done by the users. We put the scenarios upfront and document the scenarios and the test. We can see the percentages of the test done, what has been completed, and if there are problems. And then if there are problems we can rerun the test.

Panaya is just a documenting tool. It performs recordings and takes screenshots.

I have been using this solution for test and defect management and testing automation.

We use Panaya with SAP. We are using the SaaS version.

The primary user case is test management for user acceptance tests and business process testing. It is also used for test automation with record and play and codeless script editing, e.g., we can replay a test with different data sets.

Our primary use case of this solution is for reporting and as proof of all the testing that is done.