Panda Security Adaptive Defense Overview
Panda Security Adaptive Defense is the #26 ranked solution in our list of endpoint security software. It is most often compared to Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Panda Security Adaptive Defense vs Microsoft Defender Antivirus
What is Panda Security Adaptive Defense?
Adaptive Defense 360 is a cyber-security service that combines next-generation protection (NG EPP) and detection and remediation technologies (EDR), with the ability to classify 100% of running processes.
Panda Security Adaptive Defense is also known as Panda Security Adaptive Defense 360, Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops.
Panda Security Adaptive Defense Buyer's Guide
Download the Panda Security Adaptive Defense Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: December 2020
Panda Security Adaptive Defense Customers
Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd
Panda Security Adaptive Defense Video
Pricing Advice
What users are saying about Panda Security Adaptive Defense pricing:
- "Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."
- "Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."
- "The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."
- "The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."
Panda Security Adaptive Defense Reviews
Filter by:
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
Search:
reviewer956412
Competitive Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Simple enough to be used by a non technical specialist but it needs better threat intelligence
Pros and Cons
- "It's very easy to deploy, we don't have any problem or issues. It's most full automatic. It basically takes the assumption that everything is supposed to be a suspect; files, processes, URL accesses, and so on."
- "The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."
What other advice do I have?
The attestation paradigm is specific to Panda. I haven't found it anywhere else as strongly enforced into the solution. My advice would be to follow the general rules, do a trial, learn about it well. Test it in a test environment, change the settings according to your customer-specific needs, and then implement it if you find it has advantages. In the next release, I would like for them to add DDR features, threat intelligence, and more analytics. It lacks in that area. It should be integrated better with CMS and other useful enterprise applications and tools. Threat intel also needs…
Kevin Mabry
CEO at Sentree Systems, Corp.
Good remote management, excellent advanced protection, and very good overall functionality
What is our primary use case?
I primarily use the solution for my clients. I'm a service provider. It's used as an EDR, which is endpoint detection and response. The solution is used to protect my client's office and their practice.Pros and Cons
- "Their remote management (RMM) is very good."
- "The only part I really don't use as much is their firewall. It's a bit superfluous. Most people have their own firewall in place, so they don't really need that part portion of the solution."
What other advice do I have?
I'm a consultant and reseller. I'd advise other organizations to try the solution. That's all I can say. There are so many different aspects of it and so many different pieces that you can put it together depending on what you're using it for. The solution itself is great. It's just all the other stuff around it that is sometimes difficult. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. If it wasn't for the dated platform, I'd rate it a bit higher.
Learn what your peers think about Panda Security Adaptive Defense. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2020.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senko Juki?
System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Zero day protection on the cloud that is effective and reasonably priced
What is our primary use case?
I work in a company that implements firewall solutions. I am a systems integrator, not a customer. In the simplest sense, my primary use of this solution is to have as an option for our clients. In our company, we try to use every product we sell and implement in order to know how it works and if it is any good. We cannot represent products well if we are not familiar with them.Pros and Cons
- "Panda Security solution has a feature to block any unknown process and that is what is best about it."
- "They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."
What other advice do I have?
Advice that I would give to anyone deploying Panda Security is to tell them to block every process except the known ones. In this case, you will start in the best situation and with the safest approach. It is better to block every unknown or new process because these can be threats. You can then unblock those that you want to have running. For example, if you add new processes or discover processes that were blocked and should not be, you can just unblock or add them. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product as about an eight out of ten…Filip Hajek
Consultant at DNS, a.s.
Enables you to drill down and get a good overview of which applications you are using that are connecting a player to the next local operation center
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for all the processes in our environment. When we test processes, we put it in audit mode where it basically launches itself. It tests the applications and processes that are used, and then it restructures the entire environment. You turn it on protective mode so that every time a new process starts in the environment, the administrators are notified. This allows the administrators to decide if they want it to route wired or not.Pros and Cons
- "The feature I find most valuable is the advance search engine."
- "I would like to see better data protection."
What other advice do I have?
There are a few options to change or improve, but so far the product is very good. I will rate it a nine out of ten.
RedieRamos
Cloud Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Easy to implement, fine security granularity, and good reporting
What is our primary use case?
We are a system integrator and this is one of the products that we implement for our clients. We set up Panda Security Adaptive Defense for endpoint protection.Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the web filter application control."
- "The Linux installation is performed on the command line and they need a package installer for that operating system."
What other advice do I have?
In general, this product is performing to our expectations. Of course, the best thing to do if you're going to purchase any product is to do a proof of concept first. There are limitations with any software but based on our experience, we are happy with Panda Security Adaptive Defense. That said, it is not perfect. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
ChippaSekauke
Managing Director (BsC Computer Science) at Bontle ICT Solutions
Good antivirus and patch management, and it has the ability to do remote support
What is our primary use case?
We are a solution provider and this is one of the products that we implement for our clients. This solution is used to assist cybersecurity.Pros and Cons
- "The patch management module is very important."
- "Improvements could be made in terms of how the reporting is structured."
What other advice do I have?
This is a very good product. It may feel that it is a bit more expensive but in my experience, it is easily worth it. The core functionality of the product is very impressive and I recommend that people use it. That said, there is always room for improvement. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.Product Categories
Endpoint Protection (EPP) for BusinessPopular Comparisons
Microsoft Defender Antivirus
ESET Endpoint Security
Sophos Intercept X
Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra
Trend Micro Apex One
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
CrowdStrike Falcon
Symantec End-user Endpoint Security
CylancePROTECT
Malwarebytes
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
Sophos EPP Suite
Carbon Black CB Defense
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Panda Security Adaptive Defense Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the biggest difference between EPP and EDR products?
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- When evaluating Endpoint Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Which ransomware is the biggest threat in 2020?
- How was the 2020 Twitter Hack carried out? How could it have been prevented?
- What is the best for ransomware infection?
- Compromise Assessment vs Threat Hunting
- What security measures should businesses prioritize to support secure remote work?
- Why is endpoint security important?