You need to pay for licensing. It was quite expensive. I'd rate it four and a half out of five in terms of how expensive it is. 

There is a team that looks into its cost. When it comes to licenses, we don't get involved with selling the licenses. We insist that Pega sells the licenses directly to the customer. This is the model we work with. We make money only through our implementation.

The licensing is on a yearly basis. Because of our special relationship, all the training certifications are free of cost. All our employees can do Pega certifications at zero cost. It is all on Pega.

I can't speak about the exact costs. I don't deal with that aspect of the solution. 

The costing model for Pega BPM is different. One is a license that you can pay yearly. Another licensing model for Pega BPM is based on the number of cases you create in production in a year. Costing based on use cases is also available for Pega BPM. I don't have information on its exact pricing or costs, though.

The pricing is quite good in general. I'd rate it nine out of ten in terms of affordability.

I rate Pega BPM a seven out of ten.

In terms of the pricing for Pega BPM, other solutions may be cheaper, but it doesn't matter if Pega BPM has a higher price tag because what's important is that it's the best solution, and that is what people look for.

If I would rate the pricing for the solution, I'd give it three out of five.

You have to pay extra for additional features in Pega BPM.

There are multiple models. They have enterprise licenses for each server, for the product version. If you're doing it on-premise they also have per user basis on their cloud. 

It depends on what your specific need is. Those vary from customer to customer, depending on the number of users and the volume of business and things like that. There's no, set price, or a specific quote and everybody just follows it. It's more they work out the enterprise licensing agreements or per user basis with respect to each client.

This is something every enterprise has to handle separately with Pega. As a vendor, we are not supposed to comment on pricing.

The price could be lower.

The pricing with Pega BPM is a huge problem because it is quite expensive for the Spanish customers. It is higher than other BPMs.

They have both on-premise and cloud licensing. If you are a small to medium company, go for the cloud option because that eliminates a lot of the setting up of your DevTest and performance environments, multiple environments, because you can buy that from Pega with the cloud option. So your setup time really goes down.

If you're a large company, then you're better off putting it within your company. You have other skill resources within your company to create environments. Large companies have an option of either going for cloud or for on-premise.

Licensing varies across geographical regions for us. 

The pricing is a bit on the high side, but you're paying for a quality product.

Licensing costs are very high. 

The pricing is a bit costly. Although it is a little bit costlier than all other tools on the market, it is more consistent. It also shortens the time to go live by quite a bit.

It's a great product, Pega, however, cost-wise, it is a little expensive compared to other BPM tools. That's where I feel that they can improve.

The price of Pega BPM falls on the higher side of the spectrum if I were to compare it with other solutions in the market. What sets Pega BPM apart from other solutions in the market is that it has many features, including the use of AI and modern gen AI, which currently is not something you can experience in any other tools in the market. The aforementioned details contribute to making Pega BPM a leader in the market.

The solution could be less expensive according to my customers. However, I think the price of the solution is fair.

The price of Pega BPM is in the middle range compared to other solutions.

I rate the price of Pega BPM a five out of ten.

I am not aware of the cost. But, considering the licenses, user licenses, and infrastructure, I'd guess around a million USD.

Pega is expensive. If your company has a good amount of money to spend, go for Pega as it has many things readily available out of the box. But if you're looking to save money, you may be better going for an open-source platform.

The price of this solution, including installation and configuration, is comparable to competing vendors.

Normally, we don't own the licenses. Customers have their own licenses and we work on their environment.

We do not have to purchase any licenses for the product.

Users have to pay a yearly license cost for Pega BPM, which is expensive.

This product is quite expensive. 

It is cost-effective for medium enterprises. It is cheaper than ServiceNow.

Pricing is a little on the high side. One of the challenges where a certain lower level of cases was unable to justify the cost. If your process is not that complex, and it is very simple, then the implementation timeline is obviously short, but licensing becomes a little costly, and it sometimes does not cross the business use case. 

The benefits you receive are not worth the price. 

The pricing is pretty good, compared to other similar products.

We mostly have a yearly license. 

The licensing fees are based on the number of users.

The pricing is good.

The price is a bit expensive.

Licensing is expensive. You need to wisely select between per user and per case.

The licensing model from Pega BPM is too complex and is more expensive than other solutions, such as SAP. The overall price of the solution depends on the use case.

It's a user-based license where, as you scale the numbers of users, the price increases.

They also price base on the number of cases you have. 

They have varieties of pricing models.

I think the pricing reasonable. On the other hand, Pega has a clear focus on future companies. So, they say, "Okay, this is for our main customer focus," and this is, in my eyes, a bit of a pity because I think the technique and the software are really mature and could be very helpful for other companies as well that are not a main focus of them. 

We're constantly evaluating other products. We're looking at others on the market right now.

This solution's licensing model needs to be improved.

It's a yearly subscription, but there are no extra costs apart from the standard licensing fee.

The licensing depends on each client, but largely they charge a yearly licensing fee.

There are extra costs, such as certification of developers that need to work on the solution. You need people with previous experience or they have to get the certification, which is basically an extra cost.