The product needs to aggregate the bandwidth of different ISPs. It needs to improve scalability as well. 

Peplink SpeedFusion needs a thin rail model for industrial solutions.

The stability has room for improvement. Peplink SpeedFusion needs to have a heavy-duty heat sink on the case to perform better. Generally, what I found is that devices that have a heat sink on a case or, more weight on a case to absorb the heat, perform a little better. I get some areas where I'm right at the hundred and fifty degrees. So I've had a few failures not many, but I found more failures than a Cisco ISO eleven or a Moxa router. Those solutions have more mass to absorb the heat. Most failures have a lot to do with the case. That's why a lot of people have a hard time pushing Peplink SpeedFusion, and they want to move to Cradlepoint because they have a much more ruggedized case.

There is room for improvement in enhancing security features, such as incorporating intrusion detection blocking capabilities and integrating artificial intelligence to bolster security aspects on the device. However, regarding security, it's worth noting that it is a full-fledged SD-WAN device, not a firewall.

There is a clear light at the end of the tunnel with this technology, by adding some other options just in the monitoring system and reducing the prices.

I believe there could be some enhancements in the enterprise segment, offering greater options or something similar. I'm not entirely certain. The current offerings are quite up to date, and now we're venturing into the specialized mobility space, so that's something we are looking forward to.

Their hardware support isn't the greatest. We've had one unit go down, and it took a while for them to replace it. It was in the Caribbeans, so it might be a location-related issue.

Its pricing is the main issue. The pricing could be improved. 

I would like to see an outbound policy based on the application. It is a very good feature, and most of the customers are looking for that. They can also include stronger firewall features. This would help the customers in choosing this product as the only device for the SD network.

A disadvantage for Peplink maybe the features are not as strong as those of their competitors. For example, the security itself, still uses very light web filtering and a firewall. They don't have a next-generation firewall, UTM, like the other competitors. That's the disadvantage.