Performance Center Competitors and Alternatives

Read reviews of Performance Center competitors and alternatives
Micro Focus
Real User
Technical Sales at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Mar 28 2018

What is most valuable?

It's fast, easy to use, has a user-friendly UI, and you can split users. It also works well with SiteScope and other HP products.

How has it helped my organization?

Its ability to work well with other HP products, particularly SiteScope, allows us to maintain consistency in our infrastructure. The different solutions work seamlessly together and free up resources that would otherwise be spent on... more»

What needs improvement?

It doesn't provide custom reports. You can only use the default reports which contain irrelevant data or is missing data that we need. Also, a lot of our customers have issues logging into the cloud.
CA Technologies
Real User
QA Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Feb 23 2017

What do you think of BlazeMeter?

Valuable Features: The metrics are a great feature for analyzing each test. Being able to see the errors compiled, along with their responses, has been very useful.  We also love having the ability to compare multiple test results in one screen. The multi-test feature is very useful as well. The ease for creating tests in BlazeMeter has been wonderful. • Improvements to My Organization: It has allowed us to run performance tests in order to help determine if we can scale well. • Room for Improvement: The ability to run node.js scripts needs to improve. • Use of Solution: I have used this solution for around two months. • Stability Issues: We have not encountered any particular stability issues. • Scalability Issues: We have not encountered any scalability...
Consultant
Load Test Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
Oct 02 2016

What do you think of Neotys NeoLoad?

Valuable Features All-in-one product (design, runtime, results), easy scripting and variable correlation, and load generators deployed all around the world to simulate global traffic. • Improvements to My Organization It is easier to do load tests using NeoLoad. • Room for Improvement The only improvement that I wanted is support for load tests in agile mode. Neoload 5.2 makes this possible by updating the old versions of scripts with data from the new HTTP requests. • Use of Solution I have 4 years of experience. • Deployment Issues The only issue that I had was with network virtualization on load generators installed on Windows Server 2008 R2. The link is sometimes cut between the controller and the load generators. • Customer Service and Technical Support ...

Sign Up with Email