OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Stability
PK
reviewer2297829
Senior systems engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Its stability is fantastic. Out of 100 test executions, there is usually one case when it is not able to capture and generate the analysis file. We then use some manual methods to generate that analysis file and get the results.
View full review »I find it stable, there are no issues with its stability.
View full review »It is a stable product, but there are always going to be things when you introduce something, when you find a curveball that causes a problem, or when you bump into something that does not work. We just flag it up to them. Most of my guys have been around a while with various of these products, so we are able to dig in and help or support the investigation process that the support guys are doing from outside and feed that information into the support process, the R&D bug-fixing process, or the new feature request process. The guys are getting as much help as they can from us. At the end of the day, the more my guys can do to help out the OpenText guys, the better product or support we get. We get a quicker response, so we are helping OpenText support to help them help us.
Generally, if I say that something does not work and I have an error, I get an email asking for logs. I send the logs, and then they ask whether I did that as a sysadmin or as a normal user. A couple of days go by in me checking that, and it goes back in. After that, they ask about the version of patches that we are running. These are the common things that we get asked, so now, we just tick those boxes when we hand it over to OpenText support on day one so that we do not have this kind of delay in the process. We also keep looking at it because OpenText might get something working, or they might not be able to see anything with it because we might have a customized solution or we might be a slightly different version or something like that. The more we can help them and feed it back, the more information they have to zero in on where that problem is. They can come back and say that the last little bit we gave them got them on the spot, and they have now found the bug, and they can fix it. We will get that in this release, and they can hotfix it back for us. Their help is great. I am an engineer, so I always want more documentation, more support articles, and more architecture models so that I can understand more about the solution. It is good to see some of that stuff coming out as being able to be leveraged.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The stability is good.
View full review »MK
Mukesh Kalathiya
Sr. Software Engineer at Wells Fargo
We had some initial issues that were resolved and since then the stability has been good.
SR
Sanket Sunil Randive
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Most of the time, the solution is stable. If our environment is stable, the solution is reliable.
View full review »LS
Luke Steinmetzer
System administrator at Costco Wholesale
There's a window where LoadRunner is very, very stable, but we're pushing that window hard. For our use case, the tool's stability is a five out of ten.
View full review »PS
PoonamSaindane
Program Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It is a stable solution.
View full review »The stability is at a very high level. I would rate it nine out of ten.
Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is stable. We are in the process of upgrading to the newer version, but the version we are using supports many applications, such as web and Java-based applications.
View full review »The solution does have some instability and hanging issues. It has to be improved as it is causing a business loss for them.
View full review »TN
reviewer2297781
Domain Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
I have not seen any stability issues. I have seen some users report some issues, but we will usually open a case if we cannot figure it out.
View full review »The product is stable. There is no downtime, but sometimes some scripts get corrupted, and the script code generation takes time. There have been environmental or data machine issues.
JB
reviewer2297832
Director of Performance Testing at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees
The solution's stability is fine.
View full review »AA
Anish-Anand
Performance Test Professional at Schlumberger
I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.
View full review »The product is reliable. It's stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
View full review »Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is a very stable solution. My company only had to contact the Micro Focus team twice when there was an issue related to tailor-made requirements within my organization, but it wasn't because of a Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise feature, and other than that, I didn't see any issues regarding its stability.
View full review »CB
Chinnikrishna Bandi
Consultant at Capgemini Invent
The solution is stable.
View full review »RM
RuneMidtvedt
Senior Consultant at Tieto Sweden AB
There are some problems with the solution's stability, so it's quite stable, but not totally stable. I give the stability an eight out of ten.
View full review »LW
Lloyd Witt
Managed Services Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
It's a stable solution. I'd give OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise a 4.5 out of 5 on stability.
We never experienced any bugs or glitches; those are typically in the actual loads that you're running, but that's not their fault, that's your fault.
View full review »RR
Ranga Reddy
Team Lead at American Electric Power
LoadRunner Enterprise is stable.
View full review »NJ
NIKHIL_JAIN
Performance Test Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Our tool is hosted on-premises and we have not faced stability issues as such. One of the problems that we sometimes experience is that suddenly, multiple machines become unresponsive and cannot be contacted. We call these the load generators in LoadRunner nomenclature. When this happens, we have to restart the central server machine and then, everything goes back to normal. That sort of issue happens approximately once in six months.
Apart from that, we have not observed any stability issues. There are some defects within the tool which from time to time, we have raised with OpenText. If they have a fix available, they do provide it. Importantly, it does not make the product unusable until that is fixed.
View full review »TS
Managereb4c
Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
I think Performance Center is pretty stable. It's the enterprise version of LoadRunner, which was a very mature tool. In fact, a lot of the components or installation files are still the exactly same. They've added this central, enterprise web front end to it that works pretty well. It's compatible on multiple browsers, on ALM. I would say it's a pretty mature, stable product.
The stability and performance of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise are very good. It is a very established tool and there are not any issues with the reliability.
View full review »We're using version 11.5 right now and it's OK. The latest version is 12.5, and we need to upgrade ASAP. The previous versions were pretty unstable, but that's been fixed now.
View full review »JR
reviewer2297790
Global Lead application migration at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is a mature product with high stability. I rate it a nine out of ten.
View full review »It's good. It's been around a long time and we've been using it a long time. It's stable.
View full review »Performance Center is more stable than ALM. We roll out a version, and I think it fits for our clients. If it is a very early version, then we have to implement a patch. Afterwards, it is quiet, hopefully, for at least one or two years.
View full review »KM
Kirvin Maphosa
Senior Performace Engineer at Yolandi,miller@multichoice.co.za
Stability is alright. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. The only reason I'm not giving it a ten is that sometimes the controller crashes when a test is about to finish.
It can be frustrating, especially if you run a long test for an hour and it crashes near the end. You can recover the results, but it requires some effort. That's the main stability issue I've encountered. Other than that, it's pretty stable.
So, it can run stably for an hour on some occasions, but on others, it might crash within fifteen minutes.
View full review »DS
Dibyajipan Sethi
Performance Task Consultant at PCS Systemtechnik GmbH
I rate OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise's stability a nine out of ten.
View full review »RM
Rune Midtvedt
Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have had some problems with instability. At one point Performance Center suddenly went down for two days, but usually, it works. It works okay now and has not been a problem, but it was worse in the beginning. They have changed something, so it is better now than it was, I think.
HPE Quality Center ALM is stable. It obviously has not got the attractiveness of Octane. As going forward, Octane probably does now take it to the next step.
The one thing I always said about ALM, and I'll say this to everybody. The worst thing about it is it did not have zero footprint on your PC. The amount of effort and the cost to upgrade to the next version, the amount of problems that it gave us in terms of trying to put a patch on, because it was particularly essential, was really bad for the business.
We had many different PC models out there on people's desks, so it wasn't just a case of patching or building a new MSI package for one PC. You had to do it for a whole range and then you had to deploy them at exactly the same time or somebody would find that they couldn't use Quality Center.
Octane, now being zero footprint, is probably going to be one of the biggest cost savings I see.
Performance Center seems to be stable. It's probably being utilized far more readily than, say, even Unified Functional Testing.
There are issues with it that mostly seem to be environmental. You'd be surprised how many people think they know about how to do performance testing and then they start using a server that's in one area of the UK to try and run a performance test on servers in another country.
I’m thinking, “why are you running such a transaction load across our network.” Whereas, they should really be in the local area. So, with Performance Center, most of the issues are more user-based. Technically, it seems to meet the task that you need it to do.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »SJ
reviewer1576428
Engineer 2 at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
It is stable.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »We've had a few crashes, but overall they seem to be more of the aging architecture, the hardware's not as reliable. A few software bugs in there, which we have to work around. But overall, it's been pretty reliable when you think about how much load goes through it and the number of people using it.
As of now, it's working great for us, it's excellent. We don't have any issues. That's one of the reasons we are pushing forward to version 12, to incorporate the other protocols, which version 12 comes up with.
View full review »It's great. I don't have a problem with stability at all, as long as you have it scaled properly and you have sufficient hardware in place. If you're running it all on a VM, you're going to have a problem, but if you run it with the proper infrastructure, it's a very solid product.
View full review »We are still learning and evaluating it.
View full review »Our performance engineering team has feedback on Performance Center, so they don't utilize as many of the features as they should. They have it, part of it could be training, but they're not using it as much as they should. They use it, but they're not taking full advantage of all the features in it, meaning they are not combining it with UFT, etc.
They just run it to run the virtual users and then load and stress test, and that's pretty much what they're doing. They're not really taking advantage of the whole stack like we do. That's another group as well.
Stable in the fact that it does what it does, it does it well. Why they use other tools, that's where I would say there's some poly-functionality that has to be improved in the product. I'd have to specifically interrogate them on what they're not getting out of it. It's stable, it's up, and it runs, but if you want to look at is it as highly leveraged as it could be, it's not so much.
View full review »It's stable now.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »The stability on the old versions is good. On the newer versions, I think the bleeding edge is still being worked on.
View full review »We've had no issues with stability.
View full review »Running virtual users especially with a huge number is a very challenging task. The load generators may over utilize its resources (CPU/ memory) due to improper default configurations, or improper use of LoadRunner and Performance Center. Many considerations should be taken into account when optimizing resources when doing this task. For example, running the recorded script as a service at the load generator is different from running it as a process.
Also, customizing the auto-generated script in virual user generation may cause problems when ramping up the number of users. For example, simulating a generated list of variables that would be used by every virtual user is important.
Lastly, taking care of variable sizing and limitation should be reviewed, and otherwise errors may appear at certain point of running the script.
View full review »Initially (11.x) its stability left a little to be desired, but I feel HP has worked diligently to fine tune the tool so that today, the most noticeable lag occurs during the startup of a load test. Once the test is running, the tool performs as expected.
View full review »GP
Gouri Sankar Pingali
Team Leader at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
LoadRunner Enterprise is very stable.
View full review »RR
RajaRao
Associate at Tech Mahindra Limited
In terms of stability, it depends on what you are using. Sometimes version 5.3 and the newer versions are not stable. The latest versions we are finding are not so stable when compared with the previous versions we've used, so some glitches are there. They need to rectify that. It was stable for two years, and now it's not.
I find it very stable. I will say that with the changes to virtual machines and things like that, It is harder now to manage. That's one of the reasons we are looking at not only using Performance Center, but also StormRunner. That gets us away from needing to scale up; doing that within Performance Center can be difficult because you have to deal with the aspects of all that infrastructure. It's not the tool itself, but it's the underlying infrastructure that you have to manage. Something like StormRunner is promising because it gets you away from that a little bit. Somebody else is taking care of that aspect of it.
The stability is very good. A couple years ago, you might have been able to point a finger at HPE and say maybe they weren't doing enough with the product; so it was probably unstable. As it is, over the last couple of years, they've innovated a bit more. There's been a bit more change without losing the core stability.
View full review »Yes, I would say it is stable. We haven't had a problem with stability.
Performance Center requires regular maintenance in order to remain stabl
View full review »MA
Mohammad Adil
DevOps Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Although it is stable, the whole performance testing process becomes very slow because of its complex scripting and having to rework the scripts. Ultimately, this will become obsolete if it is not improved.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »Very stable. Our only issue is that we consistently need more load generators.
View full review »
Yes, though I believe these were caused by our infrastructure implementation and not the product.
View full review »
No issues encountered.
View full review »Only very rarely does it do so, but there have been issues with its host going into non-operational status.
View full review »No issues.
View full review »The stability is pretty good.
View full review »RS
Ravi Suvvari
Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
No issues encountered.
View full review »Stability is pretty good. We only had a few glitches over the past few years.
View full review »Stability has some room for improvement.
View full review »There are many issues that require day-to-day maintenance. The issues vary from customer to customer, and I can’t list all the issues as it becomes business as usual.
View full review »I didn't face any major issues.
View full review »No issues encountered.
No issues.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.