PingID Overview

PingID is the #3 ranked solution in our list of top Authentication Systems. It is most often compared to Symantec Siteminder: PingID vs Symantec Siteminder

What is PingID?
IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

PingID is also known as Ping Identity.

PingID Buyer's Guide

Download the PingID Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: February 2021

PingID Customers
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
PingID Video

PingID Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
reviewer1045701
Service Delivery Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Nov 7, 2019
A very sound product that's stable and offers good technical support

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution as software for some of the applications.

Pros and Cons

  • "The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering."
  • "If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base."

What other advice do I have?

We are using the on-premises deployment model. I'd warn that a company integrating the solution should keep in mind that if they have a lot of applications, the implementation will get complex. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
reviewer975720
CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Jan 20, 2020
Offers good support for multi-factor authentication

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for access to cloud applications.

Pros and Cons

  • "The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."
  • "The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

What other advice do I have?

We use a hybrid deployment model and are using the latest version of Ping. It's being used quite extensively in our organization, although I'm unsure as to if we have plans to increase usage. If someone is looking for a solution that works both for on-prem or hybrid, I strongly recommend opting for the cloud. It's a simple implementation and the solution is quite interesting. There are a lot of integrations. The on-prem is not very easy to implement in comparison to the cloud but it's very good, and, for organizations with on-premise requirements, it's bound to be one of the top choices. I'd…
Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity, RSA, Broadcom and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Roman Baglai
Project Manager at Raiffeisen Bank Aval
Real User
Mar 13, 2019
Enables me to securely connect to my enterprises or mobile device from anywhere

What is our primary use case?

My primary use case is for mobile one-time passwords and identity solution. Multi-factor authentification.

Pros and Cons

  • "It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."
  • "They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

What other advice do I have?

I would advise focussing on one solution because we do not use other solutions. This solution has functionalities that are enough so I would recommend to focus on one, and not try to integrate other solutions because it increases cost. I would rate it a nine out of ten.
Product Categories
Authentication Systems
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Authentication Systems Report and find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity, RSA, Broadcom, and more!