Planview Portfolios Pricing
BO
Bobby Ozuna
Planview Portfolio Support Analyst at Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
I don't have any details in regards to the pricing or the licensing of the product.
View full review »MK
Musunga Kabwe
Senior Analyst - Technology at LPL Financial
I don't know about the actual pricing. I have not come across any costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
View full review »JC
JaymeCalabrese
Director, Office of Process and Project Management at Electronic Arts Inc.
I think all in we are at $33,000 a year and that includes Projectplace and Planview. We used to have the integration to JIRA, but we don't pay for that anymore.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Planview Portfolios
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Planview Portfolios. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PN
ProjectMan83637
Project Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
All the admin guys take care of pricing and licensing and I'm pretty sure it's expensive.
NJ
NaikJagesar
Enterprise Architect at Qualcomm Incorporated
Our licensing fees are approximately $50,000 USD annually.
View full review »Planview Portfolios is not too expensive. You get what you paid for.
View full review »KB
Kelly Brummond
Enterprise Portfolio Manager at Wellmark
We're looking at the FLEX licensing or the partner licensing for our renewal. Where we are looking at having access to all of the products in our contracts so that as we decide to continue to build out the capabilities and make changes, we have access to their other products as well.
We've got PPM, but we're not holistically using that a ton yet. As we build out our business architecture and enterprise architecture, we've got that and we've got the ability to use it. One that interests me from a portfolio standpoint is the connectivity to Azure DevOps, potentially LeanKit, and Lean Portfolio management capabilities that way. It's on the roadmap.
View full review »RV
Ray Veenema
Portfolio Manager at State Of Delaware
Pricing all depends on how many users you have planned to use. It's kind of expensive but at the same token, it's worth the investment for the functionality that it delivers.
GS
reviewer1683516
Vice President, PMO Portfolio Management at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Planview is a little pricey. From a licensing perspective, for just a simple timesheet user who does nothing in the system but reports time, the licensing is a little pricey, but you have to look at it from what it is that you get.
We have 6,000 users, and I don't manage the system at all. I just have to add them to the system. The servers, maintenance, OS levels, security patching for the OS, and all other things are not something that we maintain. So, you have to look at it from an operational perspective. It is not just the product itself. A holistic view has to be taken when you look at the product and how you're going to support it. I would have to hire an entire operation staff to bring it in-house, and at the end of the day, that might cost me more. The license might cost me less. I might get a whole lot lower cost on my contract, but at the end of the day, I'd have to have all of the backend resources and the knowledge on the backend resources to support the app locally. So, the cost is strictly going to be looked at from a company's perspective.
View full review »NS
reviewer1678461
Enterprise Program Management Office, Center of Excellence Leader at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I do not have information about the pricing. I know that we have on the order of 600 people on the license, however, I don't know the costs around it.
View full review »CW
reviewer1208601
Manager, PM Tools at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees
We recently did a new bundle for all of Enterprise One. It includes some of the newer pieces, like Projectplace and LeanKit. It bundled our CTM in with it as well. I think the total came out to be about $900,000 a year. This is for unlimited licenses.
View full review »MG
reviewer1422000
Senior Director at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
As long as we can get enough participants, it will make the pricing more reasonable. We signed up for an enterprise license. That makes the per person cost much lower.
Aside for standard licensing, we had a cost for the implementation but nothing besides that.
View full review »RP
Roderic Person
Planview Administrator and Robotic Process Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The pricing and licensing are fine, but with the model we currently have, we don't have the FLEX license just yet. We actually have the tiered based on the access side from just a team member to project, we call it portfolio manager to admin. The pricing is fine. That was one of the solid points for switching to Planview. There are additional costs for integrations.
AH
reviewer1208529
Sr PPM Administrator with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model.
View full review »JC
reviewer1960029
Planview Administrator and Portfolio Management Lead at Koch Business Solutions India
The setup cost is mostly the same as competitors. That said, you get a lot of value and return on investment with just one tool.
View full review »MM
MartinMonteiro
Sr Domain Specialist at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We have portfolio managers, resource managers, project managers, and time reporting licenses. These are the licenses that we have.
View full review »AS
Allan Shafer
IT Architect at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I'm not involved really in the pricing or licensing aspects of it. One of the things that Planview as a company has done is introduce something they call FLEX licensing, where if you have Enterprise One licenses that you're not using, you can exchange them for licenses for other Planview products. So as a company, the licensing seems flexible. But that's not an Enterprise One statement specifically.
View full review »KK
Keith Kennedy
Project Administrator at Texas Mutual Insurance Company
It's kind of expensive, but I don't write the check. As long as the bosses will pay, we'll write the check. That's fine. Pricing isn't really part of my concern, per se. And again, not knowing what other solutions are out there and how they compare from a licensing perspective, I couldn't give you opinion either way.
There's the SaaS cost and there was a cost for the Tasktop Integration as well, but that's to be expected. We use JIRA and anytime we want to bolt on something new, we need to spend some money to make it happen. I don't think it's unreasonable.
View full review »TG
reviewer1425114
Director of IT at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees
It would be nice if all of the licenses were FLEX. They've been fairly stable with their pricing over the years.
View full review »The licensing part is a bit costly in comparison with the other available PPM tools. However, it is worth the price for those organizations who seek to bring their strategy to life in a world of limited resources.
View full review »NM
NarendernathMiriyala
Sr Information Technology Supervisor at Solar Turbines
Our licensing costs are about a quarter of a million dollars per year.
View full review »DM
reviewer1208538
Sr PPM Service Manager at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year.
We overbought our licenses. We looked at our needs three to four years down the road and tried based our contract on that.
However, we were over aggressive. We use about a third of the licenses that we have. We're looking to adjust the makeup so we can start utilizing the amount of money that we are spending. Right now, we're overspending, and my organization is not seeing the value in Planview because we are paying so much for licenses that we're not using.
View full review »VS
reviewer1208598
Sr IT Consultant at a university with 10,001+ employees
Licensing costs are pretty high.
LM
reviewer1425096
IT Business Office Group Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
I like where they're headed with the whole FLEX model. Your license gives you access to whichever tool is the one that makes sense on the Planview platform. That was a pleasant surprise. That has not been their approach over the 10 years I've had exposure to them.
JH
reviewer1208511
Director IT at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
I don't think we have necessarily purchased everything that I would have liked to have seen.
View full review »BH
BrianHarlin
R&D Project Management Coach at Johnsonville Sausage
We are on the Flex licenses.
View full review »LM
reviewer1421355
System Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The licensing and pricing are a bit high and the flexibility of the licensing is high. I think that the pricing to engage consultants is high. I don't have anything to compare it to other than other applications that I've supported. So there's just not a whole lot of flexibility in our licensing, which makes it very limited to what our requesters can do and different roles in an app.
DN
reviewer1359216
Senior Consultant / Project Manager at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
I suspect it's perhaps a bit more expensive than some other competitors, but I wasn't involved in the competitive bid. My job was to implement what we had bought. I don't have comparison prices.
Not sure since I don't deal with the contract
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Planview Portfolios
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Planview Portfolios. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.