The setup was quite straightforward for us. Our problem lay in not investing enough in training to fully comprehend the functionality, steps, and phases required for this implementation. I believe that once we understand these aspects, the implementation process will be quite straightforward. Perhaps the difficulty arises from translating our current project implementation methodology into the configuration process. Another mistake we made was attempting to perform this translation internally. I believe we should undergo training for this installation process.

I rate the tool's deployment a six out of ten. I work in a big company. Hence, at least a dozen resources should have been involved in the deployment process. 

The initial setup was a little more complex than expected.

The deployment process is managed by a designated person responsible for a specific module. So, there are many carrying out the deployment.

The initial setup is not complicated. It has a very user-friendly interface. It's a web-based application, and the server installation is also straightforward. It's not difficult to install or use.

The initial setup of this solution is pretty straightforward. It was not too complex.

The deployment took us three or four hours.

One engineer or administrator is suitable for deployment and maintenance.

Initial setup was straightforward and took around two to three hours to deploy.

The difficulty level of the product's initial setup depends on the complexity of the specific project. It is simple for minimum configurations. But it is much more complex for multiple requirements. We encounter errors regarding the migration of data from the management tool. We have to ensure that it supports all the functionality from the previous solution. It is quite complicated. We develop our protocol to tackle it.

The technical setup was quite easy, but the process for setting up the required templates was complex. It took one day for us to deploy it.