Portnox CORE Other Advice

KN
Network Security Specialist at Equity Bank Limited

My recommendation would be to avoid Portnox CORE. I would recommend using Portnox CLEAR. Don't even go to the point of considering it.

With my experience, I'll rate it a six out of ten.

View full review »
JO
CTO at Solution delivery

I would recommend this solution to others.

View full review »
Edem AGOSSOU - PeerSpot reviewer
Analyste reporting at TOGOCOM

The solution is good and I would rate it nine out of ten.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Portnox CORE
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Portnox CORE. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Felix Adikaibe - PeerSpot reviewer
IT INFRASTRUCTURE AND NETWORK ADMIN at Investment One Finance

We are a customer.

We are using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd recommend others to use it. It's easier to use and has this GUI that can give you more visibility to all you are doing on the device, and also it gives you a more analytic view of the people that are trying to connect. You see the Mac address of the device and everything. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

View full review »
NenadMijatovic - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Sales at S4E Serbia

Our Serbian clients are enterprise businesses. We have small business clients from the US. The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility. I rate it a nine out of ten. 

View full review »
NenadMijatovic - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Sales at S4E Serbia

We are very satisfied with this solution. We like it because it is agentless. 

I would rate it a nine out of ten.

View full review »
IS
Consulting Principal at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees

This is a simple solution and it does pretty much what it's supposed to do. We haven't had any problems with it for the past six years. This product is always running in the background. We get reports and alerts, and we deal with them accordingly.

This product has helped us tremendously during the years in locating all kind of issues that we had on the network, very quickly, and I recommend it.

Overall, it is a very good product and we are very happy with it.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

View full review »
DM
Chief System Engineer at a media company with 501-1,000 employees

We really like the solution and it does what we need it to, so in rating it let's say we give it a nine out of ten. It's just hard for me to give anything a ten because that means it is perfect. But truly, I have nothing bad to say about the product. It's a good product and it helped us tremendously in the years in locating all kinds of issues that we had on the network. It does that very quickly and reliably and I recommend it.

The product is something we use on a daily basis. It's something that's always working away in the background. We get reports, we get alerts, we assess what the alerts are telling us and then we take action as necessary. If that's what an organization needs, then this is a very good solution.

View full review »
UU
Tech Support at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

When selecting a product, if I want to bring in a new solution, I will look up the competing solution: What features do they have that are better than what I'm bringing, which will put me in a better position to make an informed decision and advise the customer accordingly.

If I'm to advise a customer that wants to buy a similar solution, I would first of all find out what their needs are, what their priorities are. Would they want agent or agentless? Would they want software or hardware? Those are the questions I would have to ask before I can say, "Go for this," or, "Go for that." Honestly, all NAC solutions are the same, they do the basic work. So it all depends on the environment, what is obtainable. Some companies don't want agents in their environment, so they go for agentless. Some don't want hardware, so they go for software. So my position is to advise.

I rate this solution a seven out of 10 because it meets my needs of ensuring that my network is protected. But then, I believe there's room for improvement.

View full review »
Arafat Matimbwa - PeerSpot reviewer
Network and Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The solution is suited for enterprises. I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

View full review »
JK
Systems & Support Engineer at CWG Plc
I'd advise other organizations considering the solution to switch when you can. If you compare it to other solutions, other solutions are kind of tied to vendor-specific equipment. They have APIs to connect to other vendors. For Portnox, it's the usual communication interfaces that are already actually implemented within most hardware and most solutions.

It is very easy to work with the solution if you have an environment that has a number of different products, which is most of the IT Department across the world. Even if you have the same brand in the environment, it's very good. However, it is impossible to have one solution for doing everything. 

It is a very, very nice product. I would recommend it to any customer. Even to deploy, it's quite easy, and the price is very good.

Overall, I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. I have never had any issue switch it.

View full review »
BL
Vodja projektov sistemskih rešitev at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We are a partner of Portnox.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

I would recommend the solution to others based on its ease of use and simple implementation process. 

View full review »
it_user150309 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
It's a good product but needs improvement. View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Portnox CORE
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Portnox CORE. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.